Fluids are one of the most common treatments given to patients in the hospital. Fluids are especially important in treating patients with sepsis. Multiple clinical studies have compared the two main types of fluids used in sepsis (normal saline and balanced crystalloids). However, these studies have not found a clear benefit of one type of fluid versus the other. Which fluid should be given to which patient is an essential question because of the ubiquity of this intervention. Even a small difference in mortality could drastically change the standards of care given the national (and worldwide) scale of this intervention. The investigators have developed an algorithm that uses bedside vital signs (temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure) to identify a group of patients (Group D) who have a significant mortality benefit from balanced crystalloids. The study randomizes adult patients admitted through emergency departments across 6 Emory hospitals belonging to Group D to intervention versus usual care. The intervention arm involves a prompt to clinicians to use balanced crystalloids rather than normal saline.
In this study, the vitals trajectory algorithm will run on all adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) across the Emory Healthcare hospitals. Patients will be enrolled and eligible for randomization once they meet suspicion of infection criteria. Suspicion of infection is defined broadly as the ordering of blood cultures in the emergency department. Group D patients with a blood culture order in whom clinicians initiate a normal saline order will be randomized within the electronic health record to either usual care or the intervention arm. In the intervention arm, if a clinician orders normal saline in a patient classified as Group D, there will be an EHR alert to change the order to balanced crystalloids (i.e., Lactated Ringer or Plasma-Lyte solution). The alert will announce that preliminary data suggests a mortality benefit from balanced crystalloids in this patient and will ask the clinician whether there is a strong clinical indication to use normal saline. The intervention is intended to start as early in the hospitalization as possible in the emergency department, as early crystalloid resuscitation choices may have effects on outcomes. The primary analysis is an intention-to-treat analysis (i.e., all patients randomized to intervention versus usual care regardless of whether the intervention resulted in a change in fluid choice). The intervention will be continued only for patients admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit. For patients in the intervention arm who are admitted to the ICU, the alert will fire every time normal saline is ordered till ICU discharge, death, or for up to 30 days of hospitalization. The intervention is necessarily unblinded when a clinician receives an alert when ordering normal saline on study patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2,012
The study uses an algorithm implemented within the Electronic Health Record (EHR). This algorithm identifies patients who belong to a sepsis subphenotype known as "Group D", in whom published data has shown a mortality benefit from balanced crystalloids compared to normal saline. The intervention is an EHR alert when clinicians order normal saline on Group D patients randomized to intervention. In the intervention arm, if a clinician orders normal saline in a patient classified as Group D, there will be an EHR alert to change the order to balanced crystalloids (i.e., Lactated Ringer or Plasma-Lyte solution).
Enrolled patients who are classified to Group D by the algorithm will be randomized within the electronic health record to usual care. In the usual care arm, the clinicians will not have any feedback from the algorithm and will not know the Group classification of their patient or the recommended fluid type.
Emory Midtown Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Emory Saint Joseph's Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Emory Healthcare System
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Emory Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Emory Decatur Hospital
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Emory Johns Creek Hospital
Johns Creek, Georgia, United States
Emory Hillandale Hospital
Lithonia, Georgia, United States
Thirty-day mortality
Thirty-day mortality
Time frame: 30 days
Intensive care unit (ICU) admission
Rate of ICU admission
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay up to 30 days
In-hospital mortality
Rate of in-hospital mortality.
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, up to 30 days
Use of vasoactive drugs
Proportion of patients requiring vasoactive drugs during hospital admission.
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay up to 30 days
New renal replacement therapy (RRT)
Proportion of patients requiring (RRT) during hospital admission
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay up to 30 days
Mechanical ventilation
Proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilation during hospital admission.
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay up to 30 days
EHR alert compliance
EHR alert compliance will be measured by the number of changes in clinician intravenous fluid ordering pattern after an EHR alert.
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay up to 30 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.