While drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB) disease in children currently requires four to six months of treatment, most children may be able to be cured with a shorter treatment of more powerful drugs. Shorter treatment may be easier for children to tolerate and finish as well as ease caregiver strain from managing treatment side effects and supporting children over many months. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate if a 2-month regimen (including isoniazid (H), rifapentine (P), pyrazinamide (Z) and moxifloxacin (M)) is as safe and effective as a 4- to 6-month regimen (isoniazid, rifampicin (R), pyrazinamide, ethambutol (E)) in curing drug-susceptible TB disease in children under 10 years old. The study is also evaluating the safety of the HPZM in children with and without HIV.
In previously untreated individuals with presumed drug-susceptible pulmonary and or peripheral lymph node TB treated with eight weeks of rifapentine, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and moxifloxacin (2HPZM), all given daily throughout, the proportion of participants who experience absence of cure (unsuccessful outcome) will not be inferior to that observed in participants who are treated with the standard regimen (eight weeks of rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, with or without ethambutol followed by 8 to 16 weeks of rifampin plus isoniazid depending on disease severity) all given daily throughout.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
860
Once daily weight-based dose
Once daily weight-based dose
Once daily weight-based dose
Once daily weight-based dose
Once daily weight-based dose
Once daily weight-based dose
Indian Council of Medical Research - National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis
Chennai, India
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGDr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Center
Pune, India
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran
Bandung, Indonesia
RECRUITINGInstituto Nacional de Saúde (INS)
Maputo, Mozambique
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGAfrica Health Research Institute (AHRI)
Durban, South Africa
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMU-JHU Care Ltd
Kampala, Uganda
RECRUITINGUniversity of Zambia, School of Medicine
Lusaka, Zambia
RECRUITINGArthur Davison Children's Hospital
Ndola, Zambia
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHarare Health and Research Consortium (HHRC)
Harare, Zimbabwe
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGTB disease-free survival at 48-weeks
Non-inferiority will be assessed by comparing the upper bound of a 95%, 2-sided confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of participants who are classified as having an unsuccessful outcome on the control regimen (HRZ(E)) and the intervention regimen (HPZM) to the predefined non-inferiority margin of 6% at 48 weeks.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through week 48
Proportion of participants with grade 3 or higher adverse events over 28 weeks
The proportion of participants with a Grade 3 or higher adverse event and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be generated. An exact test for equality of proportions will be used to compare safety outcomes between the arms.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 28
TB disease-free survival at 48-weeks
Non-inferiority will be assessed by comparing the upper bound of a 95%, 2-sided confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of participants who are classified as having an unsuccessful outcome on the control regimen (HRZ(E)) and the intervention regimen (HPZM) to the predefined non-inferiority margin of 6% at 48 weeks.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 48
TB disease-free survival at 72-weeks
Non-inferiority will be assessed by comparing the upper bound of a 95%, 2-sided confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of participants who are classified as having an unsuccessful outcome on the control regimen (HRZ(E)) and the intervention regimen (HPZM) to the predefined non-inferiority margin of 6% at 72 weeks.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 72
Adherence to treatment regimens
The per-protocol analysis will account for variations in adherence to the treatment regimens. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity scores will be applied and the net difference in treatment failure rates between the two treatment regimens and the 95% confidence interval around this will be calculated to determine non-inferiority.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 48
Tolerability as assessed by proportion of participants who discontinue treatment
Tolerability will be assessed as discontinuation of the assigned treatment for a reason other than microbiological ineligibility (AEs assessed as related to the study regimen that led to permanent discontinuation of the regimen, participant refusal, parent/guardian prematurely discontinues, etc.) among the modified intention-to-treat population. Proportion of participants who discontinue the assigned study regimen and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be generated. The control regimen (HRZ(E)) will be compared against the intervention regimen (HPZM) using an exact test for equality of proportions.
Time frame: Week 8 (intervention/HPZM) or Week 16 or Week 24 (control/HRZ(E))
Rifapentine Area under the curve (AUC0-24)
Area under the curve from start of dose to 24 hours post-dose. Measured at Week 4 or Week 8. Blood samples drawn at 0, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 4 hours and 6 hours post dose.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 8
Rifapentine minimal concentration (Cmin)
Minimal concentration from start of dose to 24 hours post-dose. Measured at Week 4 or Week 8. Blood samples drawn at 0, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 4 hours and 6 hours post dose.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 8
Rifapentine peak concentration (Cmax)
Peak concentration from start of dose to 24 hours post-dose. Measured at Week 4 or Week 8. Blood samples drawn at 0, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 4 hours and 6 hours post dose.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 8
Moxifloxacin AUC0-24
Area under the curve from start of dose to 24 hours post-dose. Measured at Week 4 or Week 8. Blood samples drawn at 0, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 4 hours and 6 hours post dose.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 8
Moxifloxacin Cmin
Minimal concentration from start of dose to 24 hours post-dose. Measured at Week 4 or Week 8. Blood samples drawn at 0, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 4 hours and 6 hours post dose.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 8
Moxifloxacin Cmax
Peak concentration from start of dose to 24 hours post-dose. Measured at Week 4 or Week 8. Blood samples drawn at 0, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 4 hours and 6 hours post dose.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 8
Parent/guardian and/or participant reported palatability and acceptability of study regimen
Based on questionnaire developed by study team, data will be aggregated to measure acceptability at Entry, Week 4, and Week 8 (all participants), and Weeks 16 and 24 (for those who continue on HRZ(E) only). Scoring based on a likert or likert-like scale for each question. Each question is scored 1 to 5 with higher scores reflecting increased acceptability.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 (Regimens 1 and 2) and at Weeks 16 and 24 (Regimen 1 only)
Adherence as assessed by proportion of participants who have taken at least 90% of their doses
Adherence measures will be documented by a treatment supporter on a TB treatment card (as per local practice), by pill count and by an adherence questionnaire and descriptively summarized for all participants. Participants are considered adherent who have taken at least 90% of their doses within the 8 week, 16 week or 24-week time frame of their regimen.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 8 for HPZM, Week 16 for HRZ(E) with non-severe disease, or Week 24 for HRZ(E) with severe disease
Risk Stratification Algorithm
If the study outcome is not non-inferior, pragmatic, programmatically available data will be considered for inclusion in a risk stratification algorithm that would aim to identify children at high risk of unsuccessful TB treatment outcome who may benefit from a longer duration of therapy. The efficacy endpoint will be analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression models to identify predictors. The models will be adjusted for World Bank country income categories and by site using random intercepts. Univariable and multivariable analysis will be performed. The association between baseline clinical predictors and unsuccessful treatment outcomes will be analyzed, Treatment characteristics will then be added to the models to determine if treatment helped in the description of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 48
Cost effectiveness as assessed by the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER)
ICER: Total costs of HPZM minus the total costs 16 or 24 week HRZE, divided by the total number of disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted for HPZM minus the total DALYs averted for 16- or 24-week HRZE.
Time frame: Measured from study entry through Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.