Is zirconomer restorative material more effective than a glass ionomer cement in restoration of primary molars
This trial seeks to evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of two materials zirconomer restorative material and glass ionomer cement to achieve better treatment for primary molars.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
24
Restorative material
Restorative material
Recurrent CariesColor match
Radiographic Visual inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS
Time frame: 12 MONTHS
Color match
visual inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS
Time frame: 12 MONTHS
Marginal Discoloration
using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS
Time frame: 12 MONTHS
Marginal Adaptation
using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS
Time frame: 12 MONTHS
-Anatomic Form
using visual inspection Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria USPHS
Time frame: 12 MONTHS
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.