The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) epidemic persists in France, with approximately 6000 new cases per year. Various prevention tools against HIV exist, including condoms, regular testing, Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP), HIV treatment for seropositive partners, single-use disposable injection equipment for drug use and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Continuous or on-demand PrEP with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine has proven effective in reducing the risk of HIV infection. France was the first European country to authorize PrEP, leading to an unprecedented impact on seropositivity discovery rates in 2018, with a 7% decrease in new infections compared to 2017. However, the effectiveness of PrEP can be hindered by challenges in retaining users within the healthcare system. According to the EPIPHARE report, which has been monitoring Truvada® or generic PrEP use since 2017, a substantial proportion of new users do not receive PrEP renewal in the first 6 months after initiation. Such early interruptions, increasing in frequency, affected around a quarter of individuals who initiated PrEP in the second half of 2021. A recent study reported that these early interruptions have a significant detrimental impact on PrEP effectiveness in real life, especially among those under 30 years old and in socio-economic precarious situations. The main barriers to PrEP adherence are multifactorial, including social precarity, limited PrEP access, and a low perception of HIV risk. To address this, in France, general practitioners have been authorized to issue initial PrEP prescriptions since June 1, 2021. The future challenge is to increase PrEP use and optimize retention to combat the HIV epidemic, relying significantly on general medicine. The goal of our study is to broaden PrEP access by optimizing its initial prescription in general medicine and to assess user retention in PrEP care through the established partnership between general practitioners and patients. The research will be conducted in collaboration between Saint Louis Hospital in the 10th arrondissement of Paris and general practitioners willing to participate in the study, located in the 3rd, 10th, 11th, 13th, and 19th arrondissements. Participating general practitioners may be in private practice, employed in health centers, or working in health houses. As part of the study, general practitioners will receive training from the infectious diseases department of Saint-Louis and Lariboisière hospitals. This training will be both theoretical and practical, with the opportunity to attend initiation and follow-up PrEP consultations in the department. A dedicated phone line in the infectious diseases department of Saint Louis Hospital will be available for participating general practitioners seeking specialized advice. They will be encouraged to register as PrEP prescribers in their appointment scheduling software. Patients will be informed of the study objectives and its process by the general practitioner, and their oral non-opposition will be collected. Each inclusion consultation will last approximately 20-40 minutes, allowing the general practitioner to prescribe PrEP, conduct the usual care consultation, and collect clinical, demographic, socio-economic, lifestyle, medical history, and patient vaccination data on a dedicated data collection form. The follow-up duration will be two years, with consultation frequency matching that of regular PrEP follow-ups, and data collection will occur at M6, M12, M18, and M24 using a dedicated data collection form. Data collected during inclusion and follow-up consultations will be anonymized and integrated into the electronic Clinical Report Form. During each PrEP consultation (initiation and follow-up), general practitioners will provide patients with a PrEP prescription if the pre-PrEP biology report allows it (according to HAS (Haute Autorité de Santé) recommendations). For patients who have not been attending consultations, a telephone survey will be offered to inquire about PrEP continuation and collect information on follow-up or reasons for stopping PrEP.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
400
Prescription and follow-up of PrEP in general practice
Percentage of patients still on PrEP
Any patient having a general medicine consultation with a PrEP prescription between 21 and 27 months following the first PrEP prescription
Time frame: At 2 years
Percentage of Patients still on PrEP
Defined as any patient who had a general medicine consultation with a PrEP prescription at 6 months following the first PrEP prescription.
Time frame: At 6 months
Percentage of Patients still on PrEP
Defined as any patient who had a general medicine consultation with a PrEP prescription at 12 months following the first PrEP prescription.
Time frame: At 12 months
Percentage of Patients still on PrEP
Defined as any patient who had a general medicine consultation with a PrEP prescription at 18 months following the first PrEP prescription.
Time frame: At 18 months
Characteristics of PrEP-Using Populations Initiated in General Medicine
It includes risk group, initiation modality (suggested by the general practitioner or at the patient's request)
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Characteristics of HIV at-Risk Populations with Limited Access to PrEP
Assessing geographical origin, social protection, profession, social precarity (evaluated by EPICES (Evaluation of precariousness and health inequalities in health examination centers) score : 11 questions score. The score varies between 0 and 100, the higher the score, the more precarious the situation.
Time frame: At baseline
Characteristics of HIV at-Risk Populations with Limited Access to PrEP
Assessing geographical origin, social protection, profession, social precarity (evaluated by EPICES (Evaluation of precariousness and health inequalities in health examination centers) score : 11 questions score. The score varies between 0 and 100, the higher the score, the more precarious the situation.
Time frame: At 2 years
Factors Associated with PrEP Discontinuation
Including PrEP-related toxicity, entering into a relationship, adherence difficulties, lack of social protection, geographical origin, profession, social precarity.
Time frame: At 2 years
Factors Associated with Follow-Up Discontinuation
Involving loss to follow-up, change of general practitioner, or change in prescription location.
Time frame: At 2 years
Cumulative Incidence of Side Effects
Assessing the overall occurrence of side effects over the study period.
Time frame: At 2 years
Cumulative Incidence of HIV Infection Diagnoses
Time frame: At 2 years
Cumulative Incidence of Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Diagnoses
Time frame: At 2 years
Proportion of Patients for Whom PrEP Could Be Resumed After a Break of 4 Months or More
Assessing the proportion of patients for whom PrEP was successfully resumed after a break of 4 months or longer.
Time frame: At 2 years
Proportion of Participating Physicians in the Infectious Diseases Service Training
Including a satisfaction survey for the training, and the number of monthly calls received by the hospital platform for prescription assistance.
Time frame: At 2 years
Percentage of Patients still on PrEP among those who previously had a PrEP prescription
Including those who received a hospital-initiated PrEP prescription, in a CEGGID, or in a sexual health center and had not had a PrEP prescription renewal for at least 4 months before inclusion in the study
Time frame: At 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.