The present study aims to examine whether the efficacy of an exposure treatment in individuals with public speaking anxiety can be enhanced by implementing interventions that target reward processes. Optimized exposure enriched with reward-focused interventions will be compared to exposure in combination with interventions targeting cognitive flexibility. The efficacy of the exposure training will be assessed by behavioural and self-report measures of public-speaking anxiety at baseline (before intervention), intermediate-assessment (7-9 days after baseline assessment) and post-assessment (at least 7-9 days after intermediate-assessment). The investigators expect that exposure optimized by implementing reward-focused interventions is more effective in reducing public speaking anxiety compared to exposure in combination with interventions targeting cognitive flexibility.
The present study aims to investigate the efficacy of an optimized exposure training enriched with reward-focused interventions compared to exposure in combination with interventions targeting cognitive flexibility in individuals with elevated public speaking anxiety. Cognitive behavioral therapy offers effective methods for the treatment of various anxiety disorders. However, a substantial number of patients does not benefit from such treatments or experience a return of fear following successful treatment. Emerging evidence underscores the critical involvement of reward processes in fear extinction. Incorporating reward processes in exposure treatments might help to maximize treatment outcomes. In the present study, the investigators will apply reward-focused strategies prior to and during exposure. Strategies are selected to target the core reward processes (i.e., reward anticipation, attainment and learning). Interventions involve finding the silver lining, taking ownership and imagining the positive. Finding the silver lining mainly targets reward attainment (liking) by attending to and appreciating positive aspects of past events. Taking ownership targets liking and reward learning by identifying the personal behavioral contribution to rewarding past experiences. The intervention imagining the positive targets the anticipation of reward (wanting) by training the prospective, positive imagination of future events. The investigators will use an active control group, in which a training of cognitive flexibility (CF; Barlow et al., 2018) will be performed. This training aims to promote cognitive flexibility in the context of public speaking situations. Participants will be trained to identify and modify non-adaptive thoughts (e.g. catastrophizing thoughts). All participants first receive psychoeducation (information on public speaking anxiety, maintenance of anxiety, rationale of exposure training), followed by either reward-focused interventions (Finding the Silver Lining, Taking Ownership, Imagining the Positive) or the CF intervention. Following this session, participants will be asked to practice these interventions between sessions. After one week, exposure in combination with either reward-focused or cognitive flexibility strategies will be performed. Symptom improvement will be assessed at the baseline assessment (i.e., before interventions), at the intermediate-assessment (i.e., before the exposure sessions) and at post assessment (i.e., one week after the exposure sessions). The aim of this randomized controlled trial in individuals with elevated public speaking anxiety is to investigate whether the exposure combined with reward-focused interventions is more effective in reducing public speaking anxiety compared to extinction training combined with cognitive flexibility training.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
40
Participants complete three interventions based on the Positive Affect Treatment: * Finding the silver lining includes attending to and appreciating positive aspects of past events * Taking ownership includes identifying the personal behavioral contribution to rewarding past experiences * Imagining the positive includes training the prospective, positive imagination of future events Participants are asked to practice these interventions at least three times a week (approx. 15 mins each) until the next training session.
This training aims to promote cognitive flexibility in the context of public speaking situations. The intervention is based on the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders. Participants will be trained to identify and modify non-adaptive thoughts occurring in the context of public speaking situations.
All participants undergo an exposure training session lasting approximately 90 minutes, which includes three exposure trial where participants give a speech, each lasting 5 minutes. Exposure exercises are enriched with interventions of the respective treatment group (either reward-focused or cognitive flexibility interventions).
All participants received information on anxiety, and the maintenance of anxiety as well as a rationale for the exposure session.
Philipps-University Marburg
Marburg, Hesse, Germany
Personal Report of Public Speaking Anxiety (PRPSA)
34-item scale for measuring fear of public speaking, each item is rated on a 5-item Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Cronbach's alpha has been shown to range from 0.84 to 0.97. High scores on the scale reflect higher fear of public speaking
Time frame: Change from baseline to intermediate-assessment (i.e., 7-9 days later) to post assessment (i.e., at least 7 days after intermediate-assessment)
Behavioral Approach Test (BAT)
Rated fear on a scale from 0 (no fear) to 100 (severe fear) during oral presentation.
Time frame: Change from baseline to intermediate-assessment (i.e., 7-9 days later) to post assessment (i.e., at least 7 days after intermediate-assessment)
Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS)
the scale measures individual trait dispositions in anticipatory and consummatory experiences of pleasure, it consists of a 10-item anticipatory pleasure scale and an 8-item consummatory pleasure scale, response format is a 6-point Likert scale from 1 (very false for me) to 6 (very true for me).
Time frame: Change from baseline to intermediate-assessment (i.e., 7-9 days later) to post assessment (i.e., at least 7 days after intermediate-assessment)
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
)\]: The PANAS consists of two 10-items scales, one measuring Positive Affect (PA) and the other measuring Negative Affect (NA). Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=not at all; 2=a little; 3=moderately; 4= quite a bit; and 5=extremely). Positive Affect (PA) "reflects the extent to which a person feels enthusiastic, active, and alert". Negative Affect (NA) is a "general dimension of subjective distress and unpleasurable engagement that subsumes a variety of aversive mood states". Higher scores on the PA dimension indicate a greater extent of positive affect, higher scores on the NA dimension indicate a greater extent of negative affect.
Time frame: Change from baseline to intermediate-assessment (i.e., 7-9 days later) to post assessment (i.e., at least 7 days after intermediate-assessment)
Social Phobia Scale (SPS)
The SPS "assesses fears of being scrutinised during routine activities", it consists of 20 items with a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all characteristic or true of me) to 4 (extremely characteristic or true of me), higher scores indicating greater distress when undertaking certain activities in the presence of others.
Time frame: Change from baseline to intermediate-assessment (i.e., 7-9 days later) to post assessment (i.e., at least 7 days after intermediate-assessment)
Brief fear of negative evaluations (BFNE-R)
the scale is used for measuring fears of negative evaluations. It consists of 12 items with a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all characteristic of me) to 4 (extremely characteristic of me), higher scores indicate a greater fear of negative evaluations.
Time frame: Change from baseline to intermediate-assessment (i.e., 7-9 days later) to post assessment (i.e., at least 7 days after intermediate-assessment)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.