The main goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a large-scale clinical trial testing a program containing several aspects for reducing the effects of air pollution on cardiovascular health (which is named the hybrid program hereafter) in adult patients (18 years or older) with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, we seek to answer how much patients adhere to and are satisfied with implementing the hybrid program, and what problems executing this program will bring for patients.
Background: Air pollution, as the fourth leading cause of mortality globally, is annually responsible for 6.67 million deaths worldwide and approximately half of them are attributable to cardiovascular causes. Some of the pollutants can negatively affect the cardiovascular system, as they may pass through the lungs, entering into the bloodstream, and cause inflammation and oxidative stress. Exposure to these pollutants is associated with a diverse range of fatal and/or adverse non-fatal cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic stroke. Besides strategies in societal-level aiming to control the air pollution, various individual-level solutions have been suggested to mitigate the health-related effects of air pollution. Text messaging via mobile phones to alert individuals about unhealthy air quality levels, and recommending to limit activity and time spent in outdoors, use face mask when going out, or use air filtration systems are among these individual-level solutions to restrict the air pollution-related health effects. Furthermore, several studies have proposed dietary interventions and demonstrated that some nutrients, especially vitamins C and E, are potentially capable to counter with the adverse effects of air pollutants on the cardiovascular system. However, the efficacy of these individual-level solutions to reduce the the incidence of clinically relevant outcomes such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and acute limb events. The current pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) seeks to test the feasibility and adherence of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) to a multifaceted intervention including a one-page informational flashcard, cell phone message alerting on days with poor air quality to encourage patients not to spend time outdoors, or to wearing KN-95 facemasks outdoors in those days, and encouraging patients to consume citrus fruits on highly polluted days (which is hereafter referred to as hybrid strategy). Randomization Procedure: Single-center (Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center) open-label randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio to hybrid strategy versus control. Permuted block randomization with block sizes of four via a web-based system will be used for the study. The specifications for the generation of the randomization schedule will be prepared by the study biostatistician. For this study, the randomization schedule refers to a list that includes the subject identification number, randomization block number, randomization code, and the allocated treatment. Such data will be kept confidential and not shared with clinical coordinators, the Steering Committee, or other trial staff members. Outcome assessment: The outcomes will be adjudicated by the Steering Committee, blinded to the assigned intervention Statistical Considerations: A convenience sample size of 50 patients (25 in the intervention arm and 25 in the control arm) is considered for this feasibility trial without power calculation for hypothesis testing. Categorical variables will be summarized as counts, percentages, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals, and will be compared between intervention and control arms using the chi-squared test. Normally distributed continuous variables will be presented as mean ± standard deviation and will be compared using the independent samples T-test. Non-normally distributed continuous variables will be expressed as median and interquartile range and will be compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Hypothesis testing, if performed, will be for the purpose of hypothesis generation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
A hybrid strategy inclusive of: 1. A one-page flashcard describing the adverse cardiovascular effects of air pollution and individual-level strategies to mitigate these effects 2. Alerting patients on polluted days (defined as air quality index (AQI) ≥ 131 \[33\]) by sending cell phone text messages and recommending to not go outdoors or minimize outdoor activities (especially exercising) on those days. This will also be accompanied by periodic phone calls to ascertain that the patients receive the messages and are attentive to them. 3. Wearing KN-95 facemasks (provided by the investigators of this study) as a physical barrier against air pollution on highly polluted days (defined as AQI ≥ 131) in case the patient cannot avoid going outdoors 4. Dietary intervention by encouraging patients to consume citrus fruits during days with AQI ≥ 131
Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center
Tehran, Iran
RECRUITINGFeasibility of conducting the trial
Recruitment rate defined as the proportion of participants randomized divided by the proportion of eligible participants
Time frame: within 30 days
Adherence to the individual components of the hybrid strategy
Adherence to any individual recommendations of the educational flashcards for mitigating the cardiovascular adverse effects of air pollution, including avoidance from going outdoors on polluted days as stated by text messaging, or wearing KN-95 facemasks if going outdoors on those days, and the dietary recommendations regarding the daily consumption of citrus fruits on highly polluted days during the 30-day follow-up. This outcome will be assessed using a custom-made questionnaire in the intervention group
Time frame: within 30 days
Patient satisfaction with the hybrid strategy
This outcome will be assessed using a custom-made 6-question questionnaire in only the intervention group, through a 5-point Likert scale for every question (1 to 5 points) with higher scores indicating better satisfaction (range= 6-30).
Time frame: within 30 days
Any potential adverse events in intervention and control groups during the 30-day follow-up
severe mask-related skin reactions, mortality (cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular), hospitalization due to cardiorespiratory causes, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute limb events, major amputation, unplanned arterial revascularization, dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, and major and clinically-relevant nonmajor bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria
Time frame: within 30 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.