Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an orthopaedic condition that is primarily characterized by the presence of anatomic bony abnormalities in the femoral head and/or the acetabulum resulting in an abnormal contact between the two during hip motion, especially in positions of increased hip flexion and rotation, ultimately leading to hip pain. Unfortunately, a FAI diagnosis is frequently only made once symptoms have become severe to an extent that they limit everyday life activities. Moreover, another important aspect that has been consistently overlooked in past FAI movement studies is the influence muscle strength and activation can have on movement pattern and symptom presentation. The diagnosis and management of FAI needs to be addressed through a more wholesome investigation of the biomechanical influence on the manifestation of symptoms. This project aims to further unravel the link between spinopelvic anatomy, its biomechanical contribution to femoro-pelvic motion and the manifestation of femoroacetabular impingement in adult male population. By, for the first time, integrating three-dimensional (3D) instrumented motion analysis with state-of-the-art full-body biplanar X-ray imaging (EOS imaging, Paris France), we will more specifically investigate the presence of an association between spinopelvic kinematics and the link to symptomatic FAI morphology, as well as investigate the presence of differences in these measures between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects with comparable femoral morphology.
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an orthopaedic condition that is primarily characterized by the presence of anatomic bony abnormalities in the femoral head and/or the acetabulum resulting in an abnormal contact between the two during hip motion, especially in positions of increased hip flexion and rotation, ultimately leading to hip pain. FAI can be radiologically classified into 3 types of morphology: Pincer, CAM and mixed type. While a clear-cut radiological classification makes the identification of FAI seem quite straightforward, it fails to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Unfortunately, a FAI diagnosis is frequently only made once symptoms have become severe to an extent that they limit everyday life activities. Not only this movement restriction is a significantly debilitating factor in such a young active population, a recent study reported FAI patients to see on average 4.0 health care providers, undergo on average 3.4 diagnostic imaging tests, and receive on average 3.1 treatments prior to final diagnosis. This raises the cost of an individual FAI diagnosis to be €1,563.26 higher than the calculated minimum required cost. Such calculations clearly reveal the long-lasting, multifactorial burden of FAI on society. Moreover, another important aspect that has been consistently overlooked in past FAI movement studies is the influence muscle strength and activation can have on movement pattern and symptom presentation. To our knowledge only three studies have looked into muscle strength by using mainly hand-held dynamometers to record the isometric strength of hip musculature. Their findings suggest hip muscle weakness in symptomatic FAI subjects, but whether this weakness is a pain protective consequence, or an actual cause of FAI is still unknown. In conclusion, the diagnosis and management of FAI needs to be addressed through a more wholesome investigation of the biomechanical influence on the manifestation of symptoms. This project aims to further unravel the link between spinopelvic anatomy, its biomechanical contribution to femoro-pelvic motion and the manifestation of femoroacetabular impingement in adult male population. By, for the first time, integrating three-dimensional (3D) instrumented motion analysis with state-of-the-art full-body biplanar X-ray imaging (EOS imaging, Paris France), we will more specifically investigate the presence of an association between spinopelvic kinematics and the link to symptomatic FAI morphology, as well as investigate the presence of differences in these measures between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects with comparable femoral morphology.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
99
Every subject in this study will undergo a radiographic analysis of the hip and spine using a low-dose, full-body biplanar X-ray acquisition (in standing, sitting and squatting position, EOS imaging).
A hip-specific 3D motion analysis will be performed. The 3D motion protocol will be divided into 2 main sections. First section: Consist of movements categorized within the activities of daily living (walking at self-selected speed, uphill walking, standardized deep squat and non-standardized deep squat) Second section: Consists of movements that are categorized within athletic training and have been specifically chosen to induce large hip ranges of motion (Sumo squats, dead lifts, forward lunges, running uphill and downhill) Each movements will be repeated 6 times. Three times with the dominant foot/opposite leg on the force plate to collect kinetic data. All data will be captured using two 10-15 camera 3D motion capture systems and one capturing an instrumented treadmill (M-gait)
University Hospitals of Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
RECRUITINGThe presence of CAM morphology in combination with symptoms
1. = yes morphology, yes symptoms; 2. = yes morphology, no symptoms; 3. = no morphology, no symptoms
Time frame: Baseline
The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS)
Consists of six separate subscales assessing Pain, Symptoms, Physical function in daily living, Physical function in Sport and Recreation, Participation in Physical Activities and hip and/or groin-related Quality of Life (QOL).
Time frame: Baseline
Radiographic spinopelvic parameters
Radiographic spinopelvic parameters will be collected via a radiographic analysis of the hip and spine using a low-dose, full-body biplanar X-ray acquisition (in standing, sitting and squatting position) as well as a classic x-ray image in 45° Dunn view of both hips.
Time frame: Baseline
3D motion analysis parameters
3D motion analysis parameters will be collected via a hipspecific 3D motion analysis where different movements will be performed on the force plate.
Time frame: Baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.