Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy

Tepecik Training and Research Hospital540 enrolled

Overview

For the evaluation of the lower urinary tract after laparoscopic hysterectomy, routine standard saline cystoscopy and carbon dioxide cystoscopy will be compared.

It was aimed to investigate whether routine cystoscopy with carbon dioxide is a safer and faster method for the evaluation of lower urinary tract injuries compared to standard saline cystoscopy. In addition, with this study, it will be studied whether bladder bleeding or intra-bladder masses can be evaluated more quickly and clearly.

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

540

Conditions

Bladder Injury Ureter Injury Surgical Injury Complication of Surgical Procedure

Interventions

carbon dioxide cystoscopyDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Using carbon dioxide medium for filling bladder

Eligibility

Sex: FEMALEMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 90 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign reasons planned patients 2. The operation will be performed in our hospital 3. Reporting preoperative endometrial and cervical samplings as benign 4. After discharge, control examinations will be carried out in our hospital. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Abdominal, robotic or vaginal hysterectomies 2. malignant reporting of preoperative cervical and endometrial samplings 3. Patients do not want to participate in the study

Locations (1)

Tepecik Training and Research Hospital

Izmir, Eurasia, Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

It was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of carbon dioxide cystoscopy.

Time frame: one year

Secondary Outcomes

It was aimed to evaluate the speed and image quality of carbon dioxide cystoscopy in detecting intravesical masses.

Time frame: one year

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.