The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Morpheus 8 Body 40-pin tip up to 7mm depth Applicator for subdermal treatment of cellulite appearance, skin laxity, and subcutaneous fat deposits.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Morpheus 8 Body 40-pin tip up to 7mm depth Applicator for subdermal treatment of cellulite appearance, skin laxity, and subcutaneous fat deposits. Prospective, open-label, baseline-controlled, clinical study to evaluate the Morpheus8 device for treatment of cellulite, skin laxity, and subcutaneous fat deposits of the thighs. Eligible subjects will undergo two treatments with the Morpheus8 device using the 3, 5 7 mm depths or sequential (Burst) mode, based on the treating physician's discretion.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
48
InMode RF system with Morpheus8 Body (up to 7mm depth) Eligible subjects will undergo two treatments with the Morpheus8 device using the 3, 5 7 mm depths or sequential (Burst) mode, based on the treating physician's discretion..each subject is approximately 9 months (including screening, two treatments (2 months apart) and 3 follow-up visits at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post treatment.
Dermatology & Laser Surgery Center of New York
New York, New York, United States
Dallas Plastic Surgeon
Dallas, Texas, United States
Cellulite assessment based on Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale
Cellulite assessment based on Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (using pre (baseline) and post treatment Standard medical photography, having at least mean of one-unit improvement (1-point score reduction). 0 - None - No evident cellulite 1. \- Almost none - A few superficial dimples or ridges 2. \- Mild - Several dimples or ridges, of which most are superficial 3. \- Moderate - Many dimples or ridges, of which more are somewhat deep 4. \- Severe - A lot of dimples or ridges, of which many are deep, covering most of the skin area
Time frame: 6 Months
Cellulite assessment based on DiBernardo Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale
Cellulite assessment based on DiBernardo Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale using pre (baseline) and post-treatment Standard medical photography, having at least a mean of one-unit improvement (1-point score reduction). This 5-point photo numeric scale rates cellulite severity from "0" (none) to "4" (severe) from a clinician's perspective
Time frame: 6 Months
Subject assessment of improvement
Subject assessment of improvement using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: 4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No change
Time frame: 1 month
Subject assessment of improvement
Subject assessment of improvement using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: 4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No change
Time frame: 3 months
Subject assessment of improvement
Subject assessment of improvement using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: 4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No change
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 6 months
Subject assessment of satisfaction
Subject assessment of satisfaction will be filled-out by subjects only using 4-points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: +2 = Very satisfied; +1 = Satisfied; -1 = Dissatisfied; -2 = Very Dissatisfied
Time frame: 1 month
Subject assessment of satisfaction
Subject assessment of satisfaction will be filled-out by subjects only using 4-points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: +2 = Very satisfied; +1 = Satisfied; -1 = Dissatisfied; -2 = Very Dissatisfied
Time frame: 3 months
Subject assessment of satisfaction
Subject assessment of satisfaction will be filled-out by subjects only using 4-points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: +2 = Very satisfied; +1 = Satisfied; -1 = Dissatisfied; -2 = Very Dissatisfied
Time frame: 6 months
Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvemen
Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement comparing pre and post treatment using Global aesthetic improvement 4-point grading scale (0=No tightening/firmness, 1= Slightly visible tightening/firmness, 2= Visible tightening/firmness, 3= Very visible tightening/firmness) at all follow up visits.
Time frame: 1 month
Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement
Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement comparing pre and post treatment using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: 4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No difference
Time frame: 3 months
Investigator assessment of the skin appearance
Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement comparing pre and post treatment using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: 4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No difference
Time frame: 6 months
Investigator assessment of the cellulite following subdermal Morpheus8 treatment
Statistically significant improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite, as assessed by PI using Global aesthetic improvement 5-point grading scale (0=No change, 1=1%-24%%, 2=25%-49%, 3=50%-74% improvement, and 4=75%-100%)
Time frame: 1 Month
Investigator assessment of the cellulite following subdermal Morpheus8 treatment
Statistically significant improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite, as assessed by PI using Global aesthetic improvement 5-point grading scale (0=No change, 1=1%-24%%, 2=25%-49%, 3=50%-74% improvement, and 4=75%-100%)
Time frame: 3 Months
Investigator assessment of the cellulite following subdermal Morpheus8 treatment
Statistically significant improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite, as assessed by PI using Global aesthetic improvement 5-point grading scale (0=No change, 1=1%-24%%, 2=25%-49%, 3=50%-74% improvement, and 4=75%-100%)
Time frame: 6 Months