The Accuracy of Reconstruction of Orbital Walls Fracture Using Prebent Mesh Versus Patient Specific Implant

Tanta University20 enrolled

Overview

under GA, incision to access to orbital walls. Then insertion of prebent titanium mesh or customized titanium implant and fixation with miniscrews, examination of ocular motility using forced duction test followed by closure of flap.

under GA, incision to access to orbital walls. complete reflection of orbital floor to be constructed then insertion of customized orbital implant of patient or insertion of titanium mrsh after adaption on the model and fixation with miniscrews, examination of ocular motility using forced duction test followed by closure of flap.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Orbital Fractures

Interventions

reconstruction of orbital wallsDEVICE

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 55 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * patient had fractured orbital walls suffering from enophthalmous, hypoglobus, diplopia Exclusion Criteria: * systemic disease interfere with bone healing enophthamous less than 2 mm

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University

Tanta, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

restoring the accurate position of eye

using exophthalmometer to measure enophthalmous

Time frame: one month- six months

motility of eye

using 9 gaze test to evaluate motility of eye

Time frame: one month

volume of orbit

using CT scan to measure orbital volume pre and postoperative

Time frame: one to six months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.