Recent improvements in punctures techniques and needles now allow for the collection of high-quality specimens comparable to core needle biopsy. A newly developed motorized fine needle biopsy (mFNB), the Precision-GI (Limaca, Israel) promises intact tissue acquisition without sample damage, relying on controlled axial tissue cutting and high-speed rotational coring for optimized tissue acquisition. Given the advancement mentioned, the investigators aim to compare the performance of the mFNB with the standard needle during the acquisition of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pancreatic and liver specimens through a prospective, interventional, single-center trial. The study will consist of two groups of patients: one assigned to the standard fine needle biopsy (FNB) and the other to the mFNB. The primary study outcomes will include sample quality (core integrity), and diagnostic accuracy.
The development of Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) has been remarkable. Initially focused on obtaining samples from the pancreas, it has expanded significantly to include various organs adjacent to the gastrointestinal system (i.e., liver, lymph nodes, adrenal glands). One of the key advancements in EUS-TA involves the shift from cytological analysis, with fine-needle aspiration (FNA), to histological and even genetic evaluations, with fine-needle biopsies (FNB). FNB addresses some limitations associated with FNA, such as low tumor cellularity and the inability to retain cellular architecture. Recent improvements in puncture techniques and needles, allow for the collection of high-quality specimens, comparable to core needle biopsy, to achieve standards for specimen adequacy (i.e., intact liver cores of at least 15-20 mm with a complete portal triad count of 11). Some current available needle designs include the crown type, flanged type, 20 Gauge FNB needles with forward-faced core traps, and the fork-tip needles, demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy and a low rate of adverse events. The Precision-GI is a new motorized fine needle (mFNB) developed by LIMACA Medical in Israel for EUS-guided FNB. It operates using a battery-powered motor that enables controlled axial tissue cutting and high-speed rotational coring for optimized tissue acquisition. Moreover, a sharp stylet facilitates crossing through the gastrointestinal wall, allowing for the reach of target lesions. The rotational electromechanical cutting movement into the lesion promises intact motorized tissue acquisition without sample damage. In the present study, the investigators aim to compare the performance of the mFNB with the standard needle during the acquisition of EUS-guided pancreatic and liver specimens. The study will consist of two groups of patients: one assigned to the standard fine needle biopsy (FNB) and the other to the mFNB. The primary study outcomes will include sample quality (core integrity), and diagnostic accuracy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
60
Using the echoendoscope, a pancreatic lesion or liver parenchyma will be identified, and a 19-gauge standard fine needle biopsy device (Boston Scientific, USA) is inserted on it to obtain the sample or specimen.
Using the echoendoscope, a pancreatic lesion or liver parenchyma will be identified, and a 20-gauge motorized fine needle biopsy device (Limaca, Israel) is inserted on it to obtain the sample or specimen.
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas (IECED)
Guayaquil, Ecuador
RECRUITINGEndoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy sample quality
Based on tissue "core"; Tissue core is defined as a architecturally intact piece of at least 550 micron in the greatest axis. The tissue core will be evaluated in both groups by the pathologist immediately after its acquisition.
Time frame: Up to two hours after the procedures
Diagnostic accuracy according to histological analysis
Proportion of subjects with a definitive diagnosis based on the number of passes and throws for tissue acquisition.
Time frame: Up to one week
Tissue blood contamination
Evaluation of tissue blood contamination will be based on a sample quality score: 1. Only blood 2. High (\>50% of the surface of the slide) 3. Moderate (25%-50% of the surface of the slide) 4. Low (\<25% of the surface of the slide)
Time frame: Up to one hour
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.