compare changes in BMD via DXA at the level of the femoral and tibial periprosthetic bone between two groups of patients undergoing cemented TKA of different design (posterior stabilization vs posterior cruciate preservation) with proms at a 2-year follow-up.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
Patient will undergo periodic (6-12-24m) dexa scans on the periprosthetic bone
Stefano Zaffagnini
Bologna, Italia, Italy
RECRUITINGIstituto ortoepdico rizzoli
Bologna, Italy
RECRUITINGPeriprosthetic bone mineral density measurement
measurement of periprosthetic bone mineral density using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: at baseline (day 0)
Periprosthetic bone mineral density measurement
measurement of periprosthetic bone mineral density using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 6 months
Periprosthetic bone mineral density measurement
measurement of periprosthetic bone mineral density using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 12 months
Periprosthetic bone mineral density measurement
measurement of periprosthetic bone mineral density using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 24 months
Knee Society Score
Two sections, one evaluating the patient's function and one for his clinical conditions, overall score goes from 0 to 100
Time frame: at baseline (day 0)
Knee Society Score
Two sections, one evaluating the patient's function and one for his clinical conditions, overall score goes from 0 to 100
Time frame: 6 months
Knee Society Score
Two sections, one evaluating the patient's function and one for his clinical conditions, overall score goes from 0 to 100
Time frame: 12 months
Knee Society Score
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Two sections, one evaluating the patient's function and one for his clinical conditions, overall score goes from 0 to 100
Time frame: 24 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
The test evaluates main aspects of arthritis such as pain, stiffness articulation and functionality. The score goes from 0 to 96
Time frame: at baseline (day 0)
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
The test evaluates main aspects of arthritis such as pain, stiffness articulation and functionality. The score goes from 0 to 96
Time frame: 6 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
The test evaluates main aspects of arthritis such as pain, stiffness articulation and functionality. The score goes from 0 to 96
Time frame: 12 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index
The test evaluates main aspects of arthritis such as pain, stiffness articulation and functionality. The score goes from 0 to 96
Time frame: 24 months
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
The KOOS holds five separately scored subscales: Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life . the score goes from 0 to 100
Time frame: at baseline, (day 0)
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
The KOOS holds five separately scored subscales: Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living , Function in Sport and Recreation , and knee-related Quality of Life . the score goes from 0 to 100
Time frame: 6 months
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
The KOOS holds five separately scored subscales: Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living , Function in Sport and Recreation , and knee-related Quality of Life . the score goes from 0 to 100
Time frame: 12 months
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
The KOOS holds five separately scored subscales: Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living , Function in Sport and Recreation , and knee-related Quality of Life . the score goes from 0 to 100
Time frame: 24 months
36-Item Short Form Health Survey
is a valid and reliable tool for measuring health outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain, but its sensitivity to clinical changes in patients with specific disorders may be limited, rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 and 100 being minimum and maximum possible scores.
Time frame: at baseline (day 0)
36-Item Short Form Health Survey
is a valid and reliable tool for measuring health outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain, but its sensitivity to clinical changes in patients with specific disorders may be limited, rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 and 100 being minimum and maximum possible scores.
Time frame: 6 months
36-Item Short Form Health Survey
is a valid and reliable tool for measuring health outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain, but its sensitivity to clinical changes in patients with specific disorders may be limited, rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 and 100 being minimum and maximum possible scores.
Time frame: 12 months
36-Item Short Form Health Survey
is a valid and reliable tool for measuring health outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain, but its sensitivity to clinical changes in patients with specific disorders may be limited, rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 and 100 being minimum and maximum possible scores.
Time frame: 24 months