Building upon prior work, the investigator team developed a communication intervention for older adults with ADRD who are considering a decision about cancer management (adapted intervention: COACH-Cog). The investigators hypothesize that for patients with dual diagnoses of ADRD and cancer, COACH-Cog will increase autonomy support of care partners and patients in the decision-making process, leading to greater acknowledgement and support of cognitive concerns and cognitive-related goals, thereby improving goal concordant care. The investigators are conducting a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT; cluster randomized by physician) including approximately 45 oncology clinicians and 130 patient/care partner dyads evaluating the effect of COACH-Cog on care partner and patient autonomy support, care partner well-being, goal-concordance, and communication.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
300
Oncology clinician intervention components: 1) a brief training video (completed once during the duration of the study following enrollment and randomization), 2) For each patient/care partner dyad that is subsequently enrolled onto the study that the clinician cares for, the oncology clinician will receive the results of the patient's GA with targeted management recommendations for identified GA domain impairments Patient/Care partner dyad intervention components: 1) Care partners (and patients if able) will participate in a one-time communication coaching session; 2) Patient GA results with management recommendations to consider discussing with the oncology team will be provided to care partners and patients.
University of Rochester Wilmot Cancer Institute
Rochester, New York, United States
RECRUITINGCare Partner: Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ)
Care Partner autonomy support; score range: 6-42; higher score is better.
Time frame: 4-weeks post oncology clinical encounter
Zarit Caregiver Burden Assessment
4-Item Measure Care partner well-being: Caregiver burden; total score range 0-16; Higher score is worse burden.
Time frame: 4-weeks post-oncology clinical encounter and 3-months post-oncology clinical encounter
Horton QOL S-subscale
11-Item Measure (Subscale Measure) of Care partner well-being: Quality of Life; Total score range 0-11; higher score is worse quality of life.
Time frame: 4-weeks post-oncology clinical encounter and 3-months post-oncology clinical encounter
Care Partner PROMIS Depression
Care partner well-being: Depression; score range 4-20; higher score is worse
Time frame: 4-weeks post-oncology clinical encounter and 3-months post-oncology clinical encounter
Care partner PROMIS Anxiety
Care partner well-being: Anxiety; score range 4-20; higher score is worse
Time frame: 4-weeks post-oncology clinical encounter and 3-months post-oncology clinical encounter
Care partner: Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care (PCC-Ca)
Care partner communication; score range 1-5; higher scores are better
Time frame: 4-weeks post-oncology clinical encounter and 3-months post-oncology clinical encounter
Care partner: Health Care Climate Questionnaire - Age (HCCQ-Age)
Care partner Age-related autonomy support; score range 0-28; higher scores are worse
Time frame: 4-weeks post-oncology clinical encounter and 3-months post-oncology clinical encounter
Care partner: Qualitative assessment of goal concordance
Care partner: Goal concordance; qualitative analysis if goal concordance occurred (yes/no); range 0-130; higher number better
Time frame: 3-months post-oncology clinical encounter
Care partner: Decision Regret Scale
Care partner: Decision regret; score range 5-25; higher score is worse
Time frame: 3-months post-oncology clinical encounter
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.