Deviation Parameters of Intraorfal Scanning in Capturing Different Intraoral Defects

Cairo University15 enrolled

Overview

For all participants, a conventional facial impression will be done using silicone material then poured and scanned using a desktop scanner which represented the control group (Group 1). Group 2, involves nasal defects which will be optically scanned using IOS(medit 700 wireless) without facial markers Group 3 involves nasal defects which will be optically scanned using IOS(medit 700 wireless) with facial markers. STL files of the facial scans and scanned cast obtained from the impression will be exported and saved to be used later for outcome assessment.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

NON_RANDOMIZED

Purpose

OTHER

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Nasal Defect

Interventions

Scanning using intraoral scanner with markersDEVICE

Scanning different types of nasal defects using intraoral scanner with skin markers.

Scanning using intraoral scanner without markersDEVICE

Scanning different types of nasal defects using intraoral scanner without skin markers.

Physical ImpressionDEVICE

Recording different types of nasal defects using physical impressions

Eligibility

Sex: ALLHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * isolated nasal defects either, total or subtotal. * congenitally missing external nose with healthy and intact remaining facial structures. Exclusion Criteria: * Any debilitating medical condition.

Locations (1)

Cairo University

Cairo, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Dimensional accuracy of intraoral scanners

measuring dimensional accuracy of diffrent scanning techniques using intraoral scanners

Time frame: Day 0

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.