This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Vespireit, prolonged-release tablets, 15 mg (Valenta Pharm JSC, Russia) in comparison with Arlevert, tablets, 40 mg + 20 mg (Menarini International Operations Luxembourg S.A., Luxembourg) in patients with autonomic dysfunction syndrome accompanied by functional vertigo.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
160
Central Clinic LLC
Bryansk, Russia
RECRUITINGFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Kirov State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Kirov, Russia
RECRUITINGState Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of the City of Moscow "V.P. Demikhov City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Healthcare of the City of Moscow"
Moscow, Russia
Change in Mean vertigo score (MVS) at Visit 1-3 of the Initial Treatment Phase relative to baseline at Visit 1-1
Difference in MVS assessed on Visit 1-3 and 1-1 (12-item scale with score from 0 to 4 for each item; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Change in mean MVS score at Visit 1-2 of the Initial Treatment Phase relative to baseline at Visit 1-1.
Assessment performed using MVS (12-item scale with score from 0 to 4 for each item; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Change in mean MVS score at Visits 2-2, 2-3, and 2-4 of the Retreatment Period compared with Visit 2-1.
Assessment performed using MVS (12-item scale with score from 0 to 4 for each item; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Change in mean MVS score at the visit of completion of study participation compared with the score at Visit 1-1 in patients who completed the study according to the protocol (PP(response)).
Assessment performed using MVS (12-item scale with score from 0 to 4 for each item; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction in total DHI score on Visit 1-3 of the Initial Treatment Phase relative to Visit 1-1.
Assessment performed using DHI (25-item self-report questionnaire with total score from 0 to 100; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction in total DHI score on Visits 2-3 and 2-4 of the Retreatment Period relative to Visit 2-1.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Private Healthcare Institution "Clinical Hospital "RZD-Medicine" of the city of Smolensk"
Smolensk, Russia
RECRUITINGAssessment performed using DHI (25-item self-report questionnaire with total score from 0 to 100; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Percentage of patients with a ≥25% reduction in total DHI score on Visit 1-3 of the Initial Treatment Phase relative to Visit 1-1.
Assessment performed using DHI (25-item self-report questionnaire with total score from 0 to 100; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Percentage of patients with a ≥25% reduction in total DHI score on Visits 2-3 and 2-4 of the Retreatment Period relative to Visit 2-1.
Assessment performed using DHI (25-item self-report questionnaire with total score from 0 to 100; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Change in total score on the DHI at Visit 1-3 of the Initial Treatment Phase compared with Visit 1-1.
Assessment performed using DHI (25-item self-report questionnaire with total score from 0 to 100; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Change in total score on the DHI at Visits 2-3 and 2-4 of the Retreatment Period compared with Visit 2-1.
Assessment performed using DHI (25-item self-report questionnaire with total score from 0 to 100; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Change in total score on the DHI at the end-of-study visit compared to the score at Visit 1-1 in patients who completed the study according to the protocol (PP(response)).
Assessment performed using DHI (25-item self-report questionnaire with total score from 0 to 100; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Change in digital rating scalescore from Visit 1-1 to Visits 1-2 and 1-3 in the Primary Treatment Period.
Assessment performed using digital rating scale (from minimum of 0 to maximum of 10 points; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Change in digital rating scale score from Visit 2-1 to Visits 2-2, 2-3, and 2-4 in the Retreatment Period.
Assessment performed using digital rating scale (from minimum of 0 to maximum of 10 points; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Assessment of quality of life in patients with autonomic dysfunction syndrome accompanied by functional vertigo using the EQ-5D questionnaire at Visit 1-3 of the Initial Treatment Phase.
Assessment performed using EQ-5D questionnaire (5-item self-report questionnaire with total score from 0 to 100; higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Assessment of quality of life in patients with autonomic dysfunction syndrome accompanied by functional vertigo using the EQ-5D questionnaire at Visits 2-3 and 2-4 of the Retreatment Period.
Assessment performed using EQ-5D questionnaire (5-item self-report questionnaire with total score from 0 to 100; higher scores mean a better outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Change in total score on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale HARS at Visit 1-3 of the Primary Treatment Period compared with Visit 1-1.
Assessment performed using HARS (21-item scale with total score from 0 to 56; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Change in total score on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale HARS at Visits 2-3 and 2-4 of the Retreatment Period compared with Visit 2-1.
Assessment performed using HARS (21-item scale with total score from 0 to 56; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Change in VSS-SF total score at Visit 1-3 of the Initial Treatment Phase relative to baseline at Visit 1-1.
Assessment performed using VSS-SF score (15-item scale with score from 0 to 4 for each item; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Change in VSS-SF total score at Visits 2- 3 and 2-4 of the Retreatment Period compared with Visit 2-1.
Assessment performed using VSS-SF score (15-item scale with score from 0 to 4 for each item; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Change in VSS-SF total score at the end-of-study visit compared with the score at Visit 1-1 in patients who completed the study according to protocol (PP(response)).
Assessment performed using VSS-SF score (15-item scale with score from 0 to 4 for each item; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: From Day 1 to the end of the study
Evaluation of therapy efficacy on the CGI-i scale by the patient at Visits 1-2 and 1-3 in the Initial Treatment Phase.
Assessment performed using CGI-i scale (scale from 0 to 7; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Evaluation of therapy efficacy on the CGI-i scale by the physician at Visits 1-2 and 1-3 in the Primary Therapy Period.
Assessment performed using CGI-i scale (scale from 0 to 7; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1
Evaluation of therapy efficacy on the CGI-i scale by the patient at Visits 2-2, 2-3, and 2-4 in the Retreatment Period.
Assessment performed using CGI-i scale (scale from 0 to 7; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Evaluation of the effectiveness of therapy on the CGI-i scale by the physician at Visits 2-2, 2-3, 2-4 in the Re-Treatment Period.
Assessment performed using CGI-i scale (scale from 0 to 7; higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Proportion of patients with exacerbation (relapse) of the disease after treatment in the Primary Treatment Period during the entire follow-up period (until the visit of completion of participation in the study)
An exacerbation (relapse) is defined as a total DHI score ≥ 31 points
Time frame: From Day 1 to the end of the study
Duration of remission period after treatment in the Initial Treatment Phase. Remission means absence of episodes of exacerbations (relapses)
The duration of the remission period is the time from the day of completion of primary therapy to the day of the visit confirming an exacerbation (relapse) or to the day of completion of the study (if there is no exacerbation (relapse))
Time frame: From Day 1 to the end of the study
Clinically significant abnormalities on physical and/or neurologic examination
Number and percentage of patients with clinically significant abnormalities found during physical and/or neurologic examination
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1 (primary treatment period), Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Adverse events (AEs)
Frequency of AEs for all treatment periods stratified by severity and frequency
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1 (primary treatment period), Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Serious adverse events (SAEs)
Frequency of SAEs
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1 (primary treatment period), Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Adverse reactions
Frequency of AEs and SAEs associated with the use of investigational drugs
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1 (primary treatment period), Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Рatients with at least one AE
Proportion of patients with at least one AE registered
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1 (primary treatment period), Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)
Patients discontinued due to AE
Percentage of patients who discontinued treatment due to the occurrence of AE
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 28±1 (primary treatment period), Day 1 - Day 42 ±1 (retreatment period)