The aim of the present study is to investigate potential cognitive mechanisms contributing to working memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. The investigators consider a new hypothesis suggesting that difficulties in mobilizing maintenance strategies of information could explain this working memory deficit. More specifically, the investigators assume that patient groups will have difficulties in employing both refreshing and elaborative strategies during a working memory task (i.e., complex span task), as compared to a control group.
Working memory is considered as a central hub in human cognition. Good working memory capacities are fundamental for daily life. However, previous research has indicated that patients with Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia have significant working memory impairment. Currently, there is no consensus on the cognitive mechanisms responsible for this deficit. Prior findings have highlighted that patients with Alzheimer's disease and/or vascular dementia demonstrate specific difficulties in dual-task situations. In this context, the investigators hypothesize that the continuous alternation between maintenance and processing phases involved in working memory could be impaired for these patients. Thus, the aim of the present study is to investigate if patients with Alzheimer's disease and/or vascular dementia can use maintenance strategies of information in working memory, as typically observed in individuals without cognitive impairments. To this end, the investigators propose a short working memory task in which they manipulate the opportunities to use refreshing strategies and elaborative strategies. The investigators expect that patients with Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, or mixed dementia will benefit less than healthy older adults from the increased opportunities to employ refreshing and elaboration. These difficulties could account for the impaired working memory performance associated with these diseases. In a second step, the investigators formulate distinctive hypotheses between patient sub-groups: * On the one hand, Alzheimer's disease is characterized by salient impairment of episodic long-term memory. Consequently, the investigators hypothesize that the working memory decline could be related to this deficit in long-term memory. Specifically, patients with Alzheimer's disease would have greater difficulty in implementing elaboration strategies. Thus, these patients' recall performance should benefit less from semantic links between the to-be-remembered items compared to patients with vascular dementia. * On the other hand, vascular dementia is characterized by a significant impairment of executive functioning. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that the working memory decline could be related to difficulties in implementing refreshing strategies (i.e., voluntary control of attention). Thus, the recall performance of these patients should benefit less from increased free time during the task, compared to patients with Alzheimer's disease. * Finally, very few studies have been carried out on patients with mixed dementia (from both Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia). The investigators assume that the recall performance of these patients will benefit less from elaborative opportunities compared to patients with dementia vascular, and less from refreshing opportunities compared to patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
120
The intervention consists in a computerized working memory task. This task follows the design of a complex span task, involving alternation between memorization and processing steps. For each trial, participants have to memorize French words. These words are sequentially displayed on the screen. Between each word, participants perform a processing task consisting in a spatial location task: They have to determine if a shape is at the top or at the bottom of the screen. After each processing episode, participants have a free time (i.e., available time to maintain information in WM). At the end of each trial, participants perform an orally immediate recall. This experimental task involves several conditions in order to manipulate the opportunities for the spontaneous use of refreshing and elaborative strategies.
As part of routine care, participants in the patient group undergo a standardized clinical neuropsychological assessment that evaluates several cognitive functions. The investigators hypothesize correlations between working memory performance during the experimental task and the results of neuropsychological tests. Thus, the investigators consider the results to several French versions of neuropsychological tests: * MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) * "Digit Span Backward" subtest (WAIS-IV) * Stroop Test * Trail Making Test (TMT) * Rappel Libre - Rappel Indicé à 16 items or GERIA-12 * Category fluences * Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and ADL .
Participants in the control group undergo 2 tests clinical that evaluate cognitive functioning. The investigators consider the results to French versions of these neuropsychological tests: * MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination; ) * "Digit Span Backward" subtest (WAIS-IV)
Memory performance in the Working memory task
Percentage of correct immediate recall, computed with strict serial recall criterion (item identity + correct position) and computed with item recall criterion (item identity only).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Processing performance in the Working memory task
Percentage of correct response in the spatial part of working memory task
Time frame: 15 minutes
Reaction time
Reaction time for each distractor (in ms) in the spatial part of working memory task
Time frame: 30 minutes
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
MMSE is a test evaluate global cognitive functioning Score from 0 to 30 A higher score mean a better cognitive efficiency
Time frame: 15 minutes
Digit span forward WAIS IV (digit number)
The participant's span is noted, corresponding to the longest number of sequential digits that can be repeated forward.
Time frame: 5 minutes
Digit span forward WAIS IV (standard note)
This scale permitted to obtain a standard note from 0 to 19 A higher score means a better performance
Time frame: 5 minutes
Digit span backward WAIS IV (digit number)
The participant's span is noted, corresponding to the longest number of sequential digits that can be repeated backward.
Time frame: 5 minutes
Digit span backward WAIS IV (standard note)
This scale permitted to obtain a standard note from 0 to 19 A higher score means a better performance
Time frame: 5 minutes
Stroop Test - denomination part
the denomination part of stroop test measures processing speed time is taken, in seconds
Time frame: 30 secondes
Stroop Test - minor interference part (Time)
this part of stroop test measures low inhibition process time is taken, in seconds
Time frame: 30 secondes
Stroop Test - minor interference part (errors)
this part of stroop test measures low inhibition process number of errors is noted, from 0 to 24
Time frame: 30 secondes
Stroop Test - major interference part (time)
this part of stroop test measures strong inhibition process time is taken, in seconds
Time frame: 90 secondes
Stroop Test - major interference part (errors)
this part of stroop test measures strong inhibition process number of errors is noted, from 0 to 24
Time frame: 90 secondes
Trail Making Test - Part A (time)
This test evaluate motor speed processing Time in seconds
Time frame: 2 minutes
Trail Making Test - Part A (errors)
This test evaluates motor speed processing Number of errors is noted
Time frame: 2 minutes
Trail Making Test - Part B (time)
This test evaluates mental flexibility Time in seconds
Time frame: 5 minutes
Trail Making Test - Part B (errors)
This test evaluates mental flexibility Number of errors is noted
Time frame: 5 minutes
Category fluences
Number of correct words is noted
Time frame: 5 minutes
Memory evaluation (16-item Free and Cued Recall, or GERIA-12)
These tests evaluate verbal episodic memory Scores are noted for each trail, from 0 to 16 (RL-RI/16) or 0 to 12 (Geria-12) A higher score means a better performance
Time frame: 40 minutes
Naming task
This test evaluate the capacity to correctly name a picture Score is noted, from 0 to 40 A higher score means a better performance
Time frame: 40 minutes
Behavior rating inventory of executive function
Questionnaire (french version) on patient's daily executive functioning, completed by a relative of the patient, if present Global score from 75 to 225, composing by several composite scores. A higher score means a more severe executive dysfonctionning in daily life
Time frame: 10 minutes
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Questionnaire completed by a professional (nurse or doctor) with the patient and an accompagniant if present Score from 0 to 8 A higher score mean a better autonomy in daily life
Time frame: 5 minutes
Activities of Daily Living
Questionnaire completed by a professional (nurse or doctor) with the patient and an accompagniant if present Score from 0 to 6 A higher score mean a better autonomy in daily life
Time frame: 5 minutes
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.