This clinical trial evaluates changes in quality of life after two treatments with near margin-less adaptive radiation therapy (ART) compared to five treatments with standard stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with prostate cancer that has not spread to other parts of the body (localized). ART is a type of radiation therapy that uses information gathered during the treatment cycle to inform, guide, and alter future radiation treatments with respect to location and dose. It may be able to deliver radiation to the site of disease over a shorter time and with smaller margins (less treatment delivered to nearby healthy tissues). SABR is a type of external radiation therapy that uses special equipment to position a patient and precisely deliver radiation to tumors in the body (except the brain). The total dose of radiation is divided into smaller doses given over several days. This type of radiation therapy helps spare normal tissue. Shorter duration near margin-less ART may be just as effective at treating patients with localized prostate cancer but have less quality of life side effects than standard SABR.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate treatment-related, patient-reported early quality of life (QOL) changes between near "margin-less" ART in 2 fractions versus standard of care 3-5mm SABR in 5 fractions, using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 bowel and urinary irritative/obstructive domains. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess treatment-related, patient-reported late QOL changes after SABR using the EPIC-26 bowel and urinary irritative/obstructive domains. II. To assess and compare early physician-reported grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal (GI) and/or genitourinary (GU) toxicities of interest within 3 months after SABR using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0. III. To assess and compare patient-reported financial toxicities, using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (FACIT-COST) assessment tool. IV. To assess and compare late physician-reported grade ≥ 2 GI and/or GU toxicities of interest within 24 months after SABR using the CTCAE v5.0. V. To assess and compare change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). VI. To explore the association of fiducial-free treatment on dosimetry, patient reported outcomes (PROs), and toxicity. VII. To explore the association of bladder filling on dosimetry, PROs, and toxicity. VIII. To assess and compare the cumulative incidence of biochemical failure, local progression, distant metastasis, and metastasis-free survival within 60 months after SABR. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo near margin-less adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for 2 treatments at least 3 days apart in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and may undergo computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on study. ARM II: Patients undergo standard SABR for 5 treatments at least 2 days apart in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT and/or MRI on study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at months 1, 3, and 6, and then every 6 months for up to 60 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
144
Undergo CT
Undergo CBCT
Undergo near margin-less ART
Undergo MRI
Undergo standard SABR
Ancillary studies
Mayo Clinic Health System in Albert Lea
Albert Lea, Minnesota, United States
RECRUITINGMayo Clinic Health System-Mankato
Mankato, Minnesota, United States
RECRUITINGMayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
RECRUITINGMayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, United States
RECRUITINGMayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare
La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States
RECRUITINGTreatment-related, patient-reported early quality of life (QOL) changes
Will be assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26. The EPIC-26 consists of 13 questions answered on a variety of scales, such as 1-5 where 1=very poor and 5=very good.
Time frame: Baseline; up to 3 months
Treatment-related, patient-reported late QOL changes
Will be assessed using the EPIC-26 questionnaire, as described above.
Time frame: Baseline; up to 24 months
Incidence of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary an/or gastrointestinal adverse events
Incidence of adverse events will be recorded at study visits. An adverse event is defined as any undesirable experience associated with the use of a medical product in a patient.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
The IIEF consists of 15 questions answered with various scales (e.g., a scale of 5-1 where 5=almost always or always and 1=almost never or never). Possible scores range from 5 to 25, and erectile dysfunction (ED) is classified into five categories based on the scores: severe (5-7), moderate (8-11), mild to moderate (12-16), mild (17-21), and no ED (22-25).
Time frame: Baseline; up to 24 months
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
The International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms and one question concerning quality of life.Each question is answered on a scale of 0-5 where 0=not at all/none and 5=almost always/5 5times.
Time frame: Baseline; up to 24 months
Change in financial adverse events - COST-FACIT
Change in financial adverse events will be assessed using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) assessment tool. The COST-FACIT consists of 12 questions, each answered on a scale of 0-4 where 0=not al all and 4=very much.
Time frame: Baseline; 12 months
Fiducial-free treatment
Will evaluate associations of fiducial-free treatment on dosimetry, patient reported outcomes (PROs), and toxicity. A fiducial is medical device or small object placed in or on the body to mark an area for radiation treatment or surgery. For example, tiny gold seeds may be put into the prostate to mark a tumor before radiation therapy.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Bladder filling
Will evaluate associations of bladder filling on dosimetry, patient reported outcomes (PROs), and toxicity using Fisher's exact test and the nonparametric Wilcoxon sum rank test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Biochemical recurrence
Biochemical disease recurrence will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test for each timepoint. Biochemical failure is defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value that is ≥ PSA nadir + 2.0 ng/mL with the date of biochemical failure set at the date of the PSA value that meets this criterion.
Time frame: At 2 and 5 years
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) kinetics
Median PSA nadir as well as median time to nadir will be reported
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Local recurrence
Local recurrence is defined as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) evidence of recurrence disease in conjunction with biochemical failures.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Overall survival
Survival duration will be measured from the date of registration to the date of death from any cause.
Time frame: From the date of registration to the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.