The main aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of orally administered vasopressin (AVP) on the perception of time-to-collision of threatening and non-threatening stimuli by combining a validated looming fear eye-tracking paradigm with a randomized between-subject placebo-controlled pharmacological trial design.
Animal models and initial findings in humans suggest a role of the AVP signaling system in socio-emotional processes. At the same time, the visual system's remarkable ability to perceive and interpret impending threats, notably through the "looming" phenomenon- a distinct pattern of optical expansion on the retina as objects approach, theoretically allows for precise estimation of the time-to-collision (TTC). It was recently demonstrated that the affective content of looming stimuli influences perceived TTC, with threatening objects judged as approaching sooner than non-threatening objects, hinting at a nuanced interaction between emotional valence and temporal perception. Within this context the present study aims to validate the effects of orally administered on the perception of time-to-collision of threatening and non-threatening stimuli. To this end, healthy individuals will undergo a double-blind, between-subjects, placebo-controlled pharmaco-eye-tracking experiment and receive a single oral dose of vasopressin (20 IU) or placebo before performing a looming visual stimuli task 45 minutes after administration. The task paradigm will encompass threatening (butterfly, rabbit) and non-threatening (spider, snake) stimuli
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
80
Administration of vasopressin (20 IU) (oral spray)
Administration of placebo (oral spray)
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
RECRUITINGRatio of judged-time-to-collision to actual-time-to-collision for threatening versus non-threatening stimuli after oral vasopressin administration
Comparison of the ratio between the judged time to collision and the actual time to collision between the treatment groups for threatening (spider, snake) and non-threatening (rabbit, butterfly) stimuli.
Time frame: 75 minutes - 105 minutes after treatment
First saccade latency(ms) for threatening versus non-threatening stimuli after oral vasopressin administration
Comparison of first saccade latencies between treatment groups for threatening (spider, snake) and non-threatening (rabbit, butterfly) stimuli.
Time frame: 75 minutes - 105 minutes after treatment
Fixation duration(ms) for threatening versus non-threatening stimuli after oral vasopressin administration
Comparison of mean fixation durations between treatment groups for threatening (spider, snake) and non-threatening (rabbit, butterfly) stimuli.
Time frame: 75 minutes - 105 minutes after treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.