Pancreatic cancer is one of the diseases with the worst prognosis, which is mainly due to the initial asymptomatic prognosis. Unfortunately, the incidence of this disease in the Czech Republic is still increasing. In a certain proportion of patients, it is possible to predict the disease, e.g. due to family burdens. Regular follow-up of such individuals is the subject of the SCREPAN study: "Pancreatic Cancer Screening in High-Risk Persons".
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the cancers with the worst prognosis. Mortality in this disease is almost equal to the incidence. In the Czech Republic, the incidence of this cancer has an upward trend, in 2017, 21.2 new cases per 100,000 people were reported, which represents a more than double increase compared to the data from the 1970s. Pancreatic cancer is associated with an extremely poor prognosis for several reasons. It is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, which is often due to the asymptomatic course of the disease or non-specific symptoms, the lack of sensitive and specific tumor markers, and difficult diagnosis by imaging methods in the early stages. Five-year survival, regardless of clinical stage, is between 7-9%. Resectable disease is diagnosed in only 10% of patients, in which the 5-year survival rate is 37 %, locally advanced unresectable disease is detected in about 30 % of patients with a 5-year survival of 12 %, and metastatic disease is found in about 60 % of patients, with a 5-year survival rate of only around 3 %. The poor prognosis of this disease is also due to the limited possibilities of screening and curative intervention for a short "lead time" in rapidly metastatic disease. Pancreatic cancer screening is not suitable for the non-selected population. On the contrary, it is important for individuals with a high risk of developing this disease. In these subjects, early diagnosis during screening demonstrated a higher number of curative resections and longer survival.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
700
endoscopic ultrasonography - frequency defined by arm
magnetic resonance - frequency defined by arm
hematology, biochemistry, Na+, K+, Cl-, Ca2+, bilirubin, ALT, AST, GGT, ALP, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, urea, fasting glycemia, HbA1c, alpha-amylase, LPS, albumin, total protein, CA19-9, CEA
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute
Brno, Czechia
RECRUITINGNumber of participants with newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Number of participants (in risk population) with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer
Time frame: From date of subject enrollment annualy in determined examinations according to the protocol schedule until the date of PDAC diagnosis or up to 60 months of subject participation in the study
Methods yield comparison
Comparison of magnetic resonance versus endoscopic ultrasonography yield
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Screening methods cost-effectiveness
Comparison of magnetic resonance versus endoscopic ultrasonography cost effectiveness
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
KRAS mutation status evaluation
KRAS mutation status defined by number of positive droplets on drop digital PCR using material from liquid biopsy
Time frame: From the date of subject enrollment annualy in determined examinations according to the protocol schedule until the date of PDAC diagnosis or up to 60 months of subject participation in the study
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.