The goal of this observational study is to test a reciprocal relationship between statistical learning and the development of language and literacy in first-graders with autism and their non-autistic peers. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. whether children's statistical learning abilities can predict their long-term improvement of language and literacy skills in school; 2. how children's brains automatically learn patterns from speech and prints; 3. whether children's learning in the lab reflects the language patterns they have learned over the years from their native language. First-grade students will participate in the study twice across three months. During Time 1, children will complete * a battery of language, reading, and cognitive assessments * a series of computer-based statistical learning games both inside and outside of functional MRI scanner. During Time 2, children will complete a battery of language and reading assessments to detect the growth in three months. Researchers will compare the autistic and the non-autistic groups to see if statistical learning plays a similar or different role in predicting children's language and literacy growth.
In this one-year R56 project, the investigators will design a mini-longitudinal project to test how children's linguistic statistical learning predicts their growth in spoken and written language in three months. The investigators predict that weaker linguistic statistical learning underlies the exacerbation of language and literacy delay in children with ASD. In this project, the investigators will gamify an existing study protocol, which has led to promising discoveries motivating the original R01 proposal. With an enriched platform, the investigators expect a low attrition rate (\<10%) and few missing data (\>90% task completion rate) in this longitudinal sample of six-year-olds both with and without ASD, matched on age and sex ratio. This project will lead to critical feasibility and preliminary data to support the key hypotheses of all three aims. Due to a shortened timeline, the investigators plan to recruit 25 children per group, sampled from a diverse population, to ensure the team's capacity for a three-month follow-up session before the end of a school year. Aim 1: Establish the longitudinal relationships between SL and language/literacy development in both TD and ASD. In this aim, the investigators will evaluate the role of SL in both concurrent and the growth of language/literacy skills assessed in three months during the school year. The investigators expect that linguistic SL (embedded pattern learning of syllables and letters) is associated with concurrent language and literacy skills and will prove to be crucial predictors of growth in language and literacy skills in both groups. Given the small sample size in this one-year project, the investigators will build prediction models both across the two groups and within each group. Sex, concurrent language and reading skills, and nonverbal IQ will be included as key covariables. Aim 2: Determine the longitudinal relationships between neural bases of SL and developing language networks in the brains of children with ASD. In this aim, the investigators will test whether altered brain functions during linguistic SL are related to poorly functioning language networks (language comprehension and phonological working memory), defined within each individual child. The investigators will also examine whether neural bases of linguistic SL predict future language and literacy development in children with ASD. Participants from Aim 1 will complete linguistic SL tasks and two well-validated language tasks in the fMRI scanner at Time 1. The investigators expect to find reduced engagement of language networks during SL in children with ASD and to provide a neurobiological explanation for the cascading effect impaired linguistic SL casts on future language development. Aim 3: Test whether linguistic SL is a proxy for children's sensitivity to real-world language statistics. The investigators ask whether the specific weakness in linguistic SL in ASD generalizes to real-world language statistics using serial recall tasks, a well-validated instrument for individuals' sensitivity to native-language statistical patterns. The same participants in the previous aims will complete a phonological and an orthographic serial recall task containing both high- and low-frequency English bigrams/trigrams at Time 1 and Time 2. The investigators predict that these tasks will be associated with children's linguistic SL performance in Aim 1 and children's linguistic SL at earlier times will predict the future growth of sensitivity to natural language statistics. These findings will establish the critical link between linguistic SL and children's natural language skills.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
41
Participants will see or listen to sequences of sounds and images either in a structured condition or a random condition.
Participants will listen to an audiobook "Alice in Wonderland" in the MRI scanner. The speech is either intact or degraded.
Participants will listen to nonwords (either 5-syllable or 2-syllable) and then repeat them as accurately as possible in the MRI scanner.
Participants will read (orthographic serial recall) or listen to (phonological serial recall) strings.
Northeastern University
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Boston University
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Language Composite Score
The concurrent language skills will be computed by averaging each child's standardized scores across the TILLS language subsets and NIH Toolbox Picture Vocab. The composite score will range between 50 and 150. The higher score, the better language skills.
Time frame: At each of the two measuring time points during the school year of the first grade with three months apart over a 40-minute teleassessment session
Reading Composite Score
The concurrent reading skills will be computed by averaging across WRMT-III subtests, NIH Toolbox oral reading recognition. The composite score will range between 50 and 150. The higher score, the better reading skills.
Time frame: At each of the two measuring time points during the school year of the first grade with three months apart over a 40-minute teleassessment session
Language/Literacy Disorder Status
The binary status is determined by children's TILLS Identification core scores
Time frame: At the first visit during the school year of the first grade over a 40-minute teleassessment session
Neural similarity between language and statistical learning tasks
The multivoxel similarity between language processing (or phonological working memory) tasks and the statistical learning task in subject-specific language (or phonological working memory) brain regions.
Time frame: At the first visit during the school year of the first grade over a two-hour MRI session
Orthographic statistical sensitivity
The difference in recall accuracy of bigrams/trigrams between the high- vs. low-frequency items in the orthographic serial recall task.
Time frame: At each of the two measuring time points during the school year of the first grade with three months apart
Phonological statistical sensitivity
The difference in recall accuracy of bigrams/trigrams between the high- vs. low-frequency items in the phonological serial recall task.
Time frame: At each of the two measuring time points during the school year of the first grade with three months apart
Linguistic SL composite scores
The linguistic SL score will be the average of the letter and the syllable composite scores after averaging across the normalized scores of RT slope, accuracy, and serial recall.
Time frame: At each of the two measuring time points during the school year of the first grade with three months apart
Neural sensitivity to statistical regularities during the statistical learning tasks
The magnitude of BOLD responses to structured vs. random conditions in the syllable and the letter statistical learning tasks.
Time frame: At the first visit during the school year of the first grade over a two-hour MRI session
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.