Assessing whether is there a difference between computer-guided ridge splitting and conventional technique with simultaneous implant placement in patients with maxillary width deficiency.
Two groups one treated with ridge splitting using guided surgery and the other one treated with freehand surgery and both groups had simultaneous dental implants the first one had guided placement and the other one was freehand.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
12
ridge splitting to increase bone width in atrophic maxilla with simultaneous implant placement
Alexandria University, Faculty of dentistry
Alexandria, Egypt
Assessing the accuracy of guided surgery
superimposition of post-op cbct to the planned position to check the accuracy of implant positions.
Time frame: one week
the bone-width increase between control and study group.
evaluation of two techniques of ridge splitting in increasing bone width.
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.