Acetabular fractures are challenging fractures to treat. Many fracture patterns occur, in a deep anatomical area surrounded by numerous vascular and nervous elements, generally in a polytraumatic context . A reduction with less than 2 mm of incongruence is generally considered acceptable, limiting post-operative osteoarthritis that could rapidly require total hip arthroplasty. Due to the long learning curve, this surgery is limited to large reference centers . In the last twenty years, the main series published in the literature are small series due to the rarity of the fractures and their trauma context (loss of follow-up, polytrauma patients…). The large variety of fracture patterns according to the Letournel classification creates a spread in patient distribution and decreases the power of statistical analysis. That is the reason why big series are rare and only a few of them allow significant conclusions . The other studies are meta-analyses with their limitations The lack of consensus makes it difficult to interpret the results between series, so the investigators developed a decision tree to address this knowledge gap. The aim of this study is to assess and compare the results of a decisional tree for acetabular fracture in a large cohort of patients from a well-known experimental trauma center.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
250
Grenoble Alpes University Hospital,La tronche
Grenoble, France
The main objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the results of a decision tree for the management of acetabulum fractures (also called acetabulum) in a large cohort of patients from the trauma center at Grenoble University Hospital
Clinical results according to the Postel-Merle d'Aubigné score (PMA)
Time frame: 1 year
Define the prognostic factors associated with poor clinical outcomes and total hip replacement surgery
Prognostic factors from operative data
Time frame: 1 year
Compare clinical and radiological findings with the literature
Clinical outcomes according to Harris Hip Score(HHS)
Time frame: 1 year
Compare clinical and radiological findings with the literature
Clinical outcomes according to Oxford-12 HIP score (OXFORD HIP)
Time frame: 1 year
Compare clinical and radiological findings with the literature
Clinical outcomes according to MAJEED SCORES
Time frame: 1 year
Compare clinical and radiological findings with the literature
Clinical outcomes according to NUMERIC PAIN SCALE ( from 0-to10) 0 no pain 10 worst possible pain
Time frame: 1 year
Compare clinical and radiological findings with the literature
Clinical outcomes according to radiological scores
Time frame: 1 year
Propose a new assessment of the traumatic hip joint based on PROMs (Patient Reported Outcomes Measures) via a dedicated digital application (Orthense by Digikare)
Epidemiological data based on PROMs (Patient Reported Outcomes Measures) via a dedicated digital application (Orthense by Digikare)
Time frame: 1 year
Evaluation of Outcomes and Complications of Early Weight Bearing in Older Adults
Complications intra-operative and postoperative (including complications of early weight bearing)
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.