Despite the increasingly common use of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies in treating cystic fibrosis (CF), it is still largely unknown whether or not other chronic therapies can be safely stopped. This SIMPLIFY sub-study is being done to test whether or not it is safe to stop taking dornase alfa (Dnase) in those people that are also taking elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI). ETI is a combination CFTR modulator therapy that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for people with CF who have at least one F508del mutation. The three drugs that make up ETI work together to allow many more chloride ions to move into and out of the cells, improving the balance of salt and water in the lungs. These changes result in better clearance of mucus from the lungs and improvements in lung function. Dornase alfa (Dnase) also improves clearance of mucus from the lungs to support lung function and has been available to people with CF for many years. Dnase is considered to be relatively burdensome and it is not known whether Dnase can improve or maintain lung function above what is already gained through ETI use. The goal of this SIMPLIFY sub-study is to get information about whether or not it is safe to stop Dnase by testing if there is a change in lung function in participants with cystic fibrosis (CF) who are assigned to stop taking Dnase as compared to those who are assigned to keep taking Dnase while continuing to take ETI. This is a sub study of master protocol SIMPLIFY-IP-19, NCT04378153. The sub study investigating the impact of discontinuing and continuing hypertonic saline is registered under NCT06350461.
This SIMPLIFY sub-study (Dornase Alfa (Dnase) Trial) is designed to evaluate the effects of discontinuing Dnase in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) age 12 and older currently taking the highly effective modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI). This is an open label two-arm randomized non-inferiority trial consisting of a 2-week screening period, randomization to continue or discontinue dornase alfa, followed by a 6-week study period. Participants at trial entry will be randomized 1:1 to either continue or discontinue their Dnase therapy. Clinical outcomes (forced expiratory volume in 1 second \[FEV1\], antibiotic use, pulmonary exacerbations, and patient reported outcomes), safety (adverse events) and patient reported outcomes to evaluate respiratory symptoms and the participant's perception of how stopping Dnase would impact their daily life will be evaluated in all subjects. Additionally, a subset of participants at selected study sites will participate in Multiple Breath Washout (MBW) to evaluate changes in lung clearance index (LCI).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
477
Discontinuation of current dornase alfa (Dnase) therapy during 6-week study period.
Continuation of current dornase alfa (dnase) therapy during 6-week study period. Therapy is taken at least once daily according to each participant's pre-existing, clinically prescribed regimen (e.g., daily, twice daily)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Providence Alaska Medical Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Tucson Cystic Fibrosis Center
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Miller Children's and Women's Hospital Long Beach
Long Beach, California, United States
Absolute Change in FEV1 % Predicted From Week 0 to Week 6
Non-Inferiority statistical testing compared difference between study arms (discontinue - continue) in the absolute change in FEV1 % predicted from Week 0 to Week 6.
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 6
Absolute Change in LCI 2.5 From Baseline to Week 6
Statistical testing compared difference between study arms (discontinue - continue) in the absolute change in LCI 2.5 (Lung Clearance Index) from Baseline (Week 0, if available, or else Week -2) to Week 6. LCI 2.5 is the number of times the volume in the lungs needs to turn over to expel an inert gas. A higher value of LCI 2.5 indicates poorer lung function.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0 or Week -2) to Week 6
Absolute Change in Respiratory Symptoms, as Measured by the CF Respiratory Symptoms Diary-Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Severity Score (CRISS) From Week 0 to Week 6
Statistical testing compared the difference between study arms (discontinue - continue) in the absolute change in respiratory symptoms, as measured by the CF Respiratory Symptoms Diary-Chronic Respiratory Infection Symptom Severity Score (CRISS) from Week 0 to Week 6. The Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Symptoms Daily Diary (CFRSD) asks a participant to state the extent of their 8 respiratory symptoms: difficulty breathing, feverishness, tiredness, chills or sweats, coughing, coughing up mucus, tightness in the chest and wheezing. Each respiratory symptom is assigned a score from 0-4 based on the response, with zero corresponding to the absence of the symptom and four corresponding to symptom being present 'a great deal' or 'extremely'. A summed score (range from 0-24) is calculated for each participant and converted to a final score with a range of 0 to 100 where the lowest scores indicate improvement of symptoms. Calculation of a score requires responses for at least 7 out of 8 symptoms
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 6
Absolute Change in Respiratory Symptoms, as Measured by CFQ-R Respiratory Domain From Week 0 to Week 6
Statistical testing compared the difference between study arms (discontinue - continue) in the absolute change in respiratory symptoms, as measured by the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised Respiratory Domain Score from Week 0 to Week 6. The Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire - Revised asks participants 6 questions related to respiratory symptoms which are each assigned a score 1-4. The Respiratory Domain Scaled Score is calculated as follows: 100\*\[{sum of responses}/{number of responses}-1\]/3 only if number of responses ≥ 3; otherwise the score is set to missing. The scaled score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate improvement of symptoms.
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 6
Absolute Change in FEV1 % Predicted From Week -2 to Week 0
Statistical testing compared the difference between study arms (discontinue - continue) in the absolute change in FEV1 % predicted from Week -2 to Week 0.
Time frame: Week -2 to Week 0
Absolute Change in FEV1 % Predicted From Week 0 to Week 2
Statistical testing compared the difference between study arms (discontinue - continue) in the absolute change in FEV1 % predicted from Week 0 to Week 2.
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 2
Number and Percent of Participants Initiating Acute Antibiotics From Week 0 to Week 6
Difference between study arms (discontinue - continue) in the percent of subjects initiating acute oral, inhaled or intravenous antibiotics from Week 0 to Week 6. Includes antibiotics initiated for respiratory indications; excludes those taken as part of a chronic cycled regimen or for a UTI, skin infection, etc.
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 6
Number and Percent of Participants Hospitalized From Week 0 to Week 6
Statistical testing compared the difference between study arms (discontinue - continue) in the percent of subjects hospitalized from Week 0 to Week 6.
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 6
Number and Percent of Participants Experiencing Pulmonary Exacerbations From Week 0 to Week 6
Statistical testing compared the difference between study arms (discontinue - continue) in the percent of subjects experiencing a pulmonary exacerbation from Week 0 to Week 6. Pulmonary exacerbations defined using Fuchs criteria.
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 6
Number and Percent of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) From Week 0 to Week 6
Statistical testing compared the difference between study arms (discontinue - continue) in the percent of participants with at least one AE from Week 0 to Week 6. Includes serious and non-serious AEs.
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 6
Rate of Adverse Events (AEs) From Week 0 to Week 6 Therapy Arms
Statistical testing compared the compared the rate of AE occurrence (number of events divided by total follow-up weeks in each arm) between study arms from Week 0 to Week 6. Includes serious and non-serious AEs.
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 6
Number and Percent of Participants With Temporary or Permanent Changes From Assigned Therapy Regimen Due to Adverse Event From Week 0 to Week 6
Statistical testing compared the difference between study arms (discontinue - continue) in the percent of subjects temporarily or permanently changing their assigned therapy regimen due to an adverse event Week 0 to Week 6
Time frame: Week 0 to Week 6
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CHOC Children's Hospital
Orange, California, United States
Stanford University Medical Center
Palo Alto, California, United States
Rady Children's Hospital and Health Center at the University of California San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
University of California, San Francisco - Adult Center
San Francisco, California, United States
University of California, San Francisco - Peds Center
San Francisco, California, United States
...and 71 more locations