A Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) Study to collect clinical data on safety and performance of all Teknimed Arthroplasty range of products: CEMFIX® and GENTAFIX® bone cements families and CEMSTOP® cement restrictor, and all their private labels. Teknimed bone cements and cement restrictor are legacy products, some marketed for more than 20 years. Their performance and safety have already been demonstrated by Post-Market Surveillance and previous clinical studies. The current Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up study aims to confirm these claims by collecting data in a "real-life" setting. The study is a retrospective and prospective global, single arm, non-controlled, multicentric, ambispective observational study. Patients will be followed as per local standard medical care of the site.
It is admitted that: * Joint replacement is a commonly performed major surgical procedure that has considerable success in alleviating pain and disability; * These procedures may be done with the help of a bone cement (PMMA) to fix the prosthesis to the bone (cemented fixation); * Most common reasons for primary joint replacement are osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis and trauma; * Most common reasons for revision of joint replacement are dislocation, infection, fracture and prothesis loosening; * Quality of bone cement have a large influence on long-term implant stability. TEKNIMED has developed several bone cements and a cement restrictor currently used in arthroplasty procedures. With the increasing use of these procedures, there is a need of real-life long-term safety and efficacy data on the bone cements. This retro- and prospective study is performed to assess the safety and performance of TEKNIMED arthroplasty products in their current clinical use.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,050
Joint replacement with cemented prosthetic components
CH de Brive
Brive-la-Gaillarde, Aquitaine, France
RECRUITINGClinique du Vivarais
Aubenas, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
RECRUITINGClinique du Val d'Ouest
Écully, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
RECRUITINGCabinet de consultation
Évreux, Eure, France
RECRUITINGClinique de l'Atlantique
Puilboreau, New Aquitaine, France
RECRUITINGClinique du Dr Henri Guillard
Coutances, Normandy, France
RECRUITINGMIROUSE
Boujan-sur-Libron, Occitanie, France
RECRUITINGHôpital Européen Marseille
Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, France
RECRUITINGInstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
RECRUITINGOspedale Santissima Annunziata
Cento, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
RECRUITINGSurvival rate
Prosthesis survival defined as time from implantation to revision surgery due to a cement defect.
Time frame: 15 years (until the lifetime of the device)
Superficial and/or deep postoperative infection rate.
In the case of cements with gentamicin, superficial and/or deep postoperative infection rate.
Time frame: 15 years (until the lifetime of the device)
Pain Level
Pain evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most severe pain at the Baseline and at the Follow-up visits
Time frame: 5 years
Patients' satisfaction
Patient satisfaction assessed using a 3-question patient satisfaction questionnaire (Yes/No/Without opinion) at the Follow-up visits
Time frame: 5 years
Restoration of function
Evaluation of mobility by functional scores: "Constant Score" for the shoulder (scale of 100 points, 100 points is the best mobility) at the baseline and at the Follow-up visits
Time frame: 5 years
Evaluation of function and radiological outcomes
"SEDEL Score" at the Follow-up visits ( A: no pejorative functional and radiographic signs / B: patients with stable clinical result but demonstrating progressively evolving radiographic alterations / C: patients with deteriorating functional score but lack of any radiographic explanation / D: patients with bad clinical score associated with progressive radiographic deterioration)
Time frame: 5 years
Complications rate
Evaluation of complications will be assessed on radiological images: cement leakage, implant migration, radiolucent lines, osteolytic zone at the Follow-up visits
Time frame: 5 years
Antalgic consumption
Antalgic consumption and the drug type at the Baseline and at the Follow-up visits
Time frame: 5 years
Restoration of function
Evaluation of mobility by functional scores: "Postel Merle d'Aubigne score" (PMA) for the hip (scale of 18 points, 18 points is the best functional score) at the Baseline and at the Follow-up visits
Time frame: 5 years
Restoration of function
Evaluation of mobility by functional scores: "Tegner Lysholm Knee Score" for the knee (scale of 100 points, 100 points is the best functional score) at the Baseline and at the Follow-up visits
Time frame: 5 years
Adverse events
All adverse events (such as prosthesis loosening rate, dislocation, deep infection …) occured during surgery and through study completion
Time frame: 15 years (until the lifetime of the device)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.