The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to test the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with advanced structural heart disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What is the efficacy of SBRT compared to catheter ablation (CA) in achieving a ≥ 75% reduction in VT burden at 6 months * What is the comparable safety profile of SBRT vs CA Researchers will compare SBRT and CA (standard of care).
Hypothesis We hypothesise that in an open label randomised controlled trial of patients with advanced structural heart disease and ventricular tachycardia (VT) that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) will be superior in reducing VT burden compared to standard care comprising of catheter ablation (CA) and routine medical care with acceptable safety and adverse events. Aims This is a trial to examine if in an open label randomised trial of 60 patients with structural heart disease and VT followed for 3 years with a minimum follow up of 1 year of SBRT compared CA results in: 1. An improvement in a primary outcome of proportion of patients with a ≥75% reduction in VT burden in the 6 months following intervention compared to the 6 months intervention 2. Comparable safety profile (serious adverse events \[SAE\] and adverse events of special interest \[AESI\] at 6 months; 3. reduction in secondary endpoints at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of: any VT recurrence, absolute % reduction in VT burden compared to 6 months pre-treatment, number of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) compared to pre-treatment, cardiovascular hospitalisation, all-cause mortality, cardiac transplantation, combined endpoint of cardiovascular hospitalisation/transplant/mortality, SAE and AESI from treatment, ventricular function abd change of quality of life (QOL) metrics (at 12 months).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
60
VT burden
Change in proportion of patients with a ≥75% reduction in VT burden at 6 months (number of VT episodes in 6 months post treatment compared to the number of VT episodes in the 6 months prior to randomisation excluding a 6-week blanking period after treatment initiation)
Time frame: 6 months
Recurrent sustained VT
Recurrent sustained VT ascertained by implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (VT identified and treated by the ICD with anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and/or internal ICD delivered shock or ≥30 seconds of VT if untreated by ICD
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
VT storm
VT storm (three or more documented episodes of VT within 24 hours or incessant VT)
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Absolute VT burden
Absolute percentage reduction in VT burden compared to pre-ablation
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
1. SAE and AESI related to effects of SBRT 2. SAE and AESI related to standard care e.g. medical anti-arrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation or heart transplantation
Time frame: At all time points up to 36 months
ICD shocks
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator shocks
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Hospitalization
Cardiovascular as well as specifically heart failure and arrhythmia
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
All cause mortality
All cause mortality
Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
Cardiovascular Mortality
Cardiovascular mortality
Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
Composite outcome of VT recurrence/hospitalisation/death/ cardiac transplantation
Composite outcome as above
Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
Ventricular function
As determined by echocardiography (ejection fraction, speckle tracking echocardiography)
Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
Quality of Life as per Short Form - 36 (SF-36) Score
Change in quality of life at 6 and 12 months (compared to pre-intervention) as measured by Short Form- 36 (SF-36) \[0-100 scale, 0 is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability\].
Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
Quality of Life as per Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Concerns Questionnaire (ICDC) score
Change in quality of life at 6 and 12 months (compared to pre-intervention) as measured by Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Concerns Questionnaire (ICDC) score. \[0-100 scale, 100 equivalent to maximum concern\]
Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
Number of AADs
Number of AADs at time points following randomization
Time frame: 6,12, 24 and 36 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.