En-mass Retraction by KILBON Versus CAT Appliances

N/ANot Yet RecruitingNCT06366737

Cairo University30 enrolled

Overview

en-mass retraction by lingual retractor versus clear alighner therapy

Comparative Effectiveness Of Lingual Retractor Versus Clear Aligner Appliances In Adult Patients With Maxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion Treated By Upper First Premolars Extraction And Enmass Retraction Of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Segment Using Palatal Orthodontic Miniscrews :A Randomized Clinical Trial

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Maxillary Prognathism

Interventions

KILBON ApplianceDEVICE

palatal TAD assissted lingual appliance for en-mass retraction

CAT applianceDEVICE

palatal TAD assissted clear aligner

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with mild crowding Exclusion Criteria: * \- adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with moderate to severe crowding

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry

Cairo, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Patient satisfaction during & after phase I treatment.

questionnaire

Time frame: 6 months

Secondary Outcomes

inclination of upper anterior teeth

angle measurement of long axis of maxillary central to maxillary plane in degrees

Time frame: 6 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.