This study is designed to assess the comparative clinical utility of the point of care cobas® liat CT/NG/MG to current standard practices in the diagnosis and treatment of urogenital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG).
The study is designed as a block randomized, controlled 2-arm prospective study. The study targets to enroll approximatively 348 participants at increased risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs)-participants who have known contact with CT/NG/MG (including participants who report knowledge or suspicion of STI exposure, despite the uncertainty of the specific STI pathogen or contact testing results), or participants with symptoms suggestive of STI-to participate in this study. Participants who give consent will provide demographic information and urogenital specimen(s) for CT/NG/MG testing on the cobas® liat system and for external laboratory-polymerase chain reaction (EL-PCR) testing. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio in blocks (of multiples of 2) stratified by the site to either of the following arms: * Standard of Care (SOC) * Point of Care (POC) In both arms, the clinician will see and evaluate the participant and will complete a standardized form, known as a patient management plan (PMP), at the conclusion of the participant's encounter. The critical difference between the arms is that the clinician in the POC arm will be provided POC test results upon which they may choose to base their clinical decisions, whereas the SOC arm will not receive POC test results.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
331
The cobas® CT/NG/MG nucleic acid test for use on the cobas® Liat® System is an investigational, automated, qualitative in vitro nucleic acid diagnostic test that utilizes real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) nucleic acid in male/female urine and vaginal swabs (clinician-collected and self-collected) in cobas® PCR Media.
Standard of care (SOC) is defined as the traditional/typical diagnosis and treatment steps in practice recommended by the CDC guidelines that rely upon clinical syndromic presentations and/or external laboratory testing.
San Francisco City Clinic
San Francisco, California, United States
Planned Parenthood of Northern, Central, and Southern New Jersey, Inc.
Hamilton Square, New Jersey, United States
Planned Parenthood of Northern, Central and Southern New Jersey
Perth Amboy, New Jersey, United States
Baylor Scott & White Health - Kileen
Killeen, Texas, United States
Percentage of Participants Given Inappropriate Treatments for All Pathogens Combined (CT, NG, and MG)
An inappropriate treatment was defined as under and/or overtreatment on the day of the medical encounter based on the CDC recommendations for the pathogen-specific results obtained by the EL-PCR testing. Overtreatment was defined by the provision of 2 or more antibiotics when only 1 is necessary, or provision of any unnecessary antibiotics. Undertreatment was defined by failure to provide pathogen-appropriate antimicrobials either alone or in combination.
Time frame: On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
Percentage of Participants Given Inappropriate Treatment for CT Infection
An inappropriate treatment was defined as under and/or overtreatment on the day of the medical encounter based on CDC recommendations for the pathogen-specific results obtained by the EL-PCR testing. Overtreatment was defined by the provision of 2 or more antibiotics when only 1 is necessary, or provision of any unnecessary antibiotics. Undertreatment was defined by failure to provide pathogen-appropriate antimicrobials either alone or in combination.
Time frame: On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
Percentage of Participants Given Inappropriate Treatment for NG Infection
An inappropriate treatment was defined as under and/or overtreatment on the day of the medical encounter based on CDC recommendations for the pathogen-specific results obtained by the EL-PCR testing. Overtreatment was defined by the provision of 2 or more antibiotics when only 1 is necessary, or provision of any unnecessary antibiotics. Undertreatment was defined by failure to provide pathogen-appropriate antimicrobials either alone or in combination.
Time frame: On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
Percentage of Participants Given Inappropriate Treatment for MG Infection
An inappropriate treatment was defined as under and/or overtreatment on the day of the medical encounter based on CDC recommendations for the pathogen-specific results obtained by the EL-PCR testing. Overtreatment was defined by the provision of 2 or more antibiotics when only 1 is necessary, or provision of any unnecessary antibiotics. Undertreatment was defined by failure to provide pathogen-appropriate antimicrobials either alone or in combination.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
Percentage of Clinicians With Satisfaction Scores for SOC and POC According to the Clinician Satisfaction With Diagnostic Test Questionnaire (CSDT-Q)
The CSDT- Questionnaire assessed satisfaction with the test and SOC based on responses to the following: ease of use, time taken to perform, speed of results, ease of result interpretation, impact on the care plan, impact on consultations, impact on workload/workflow, and guidance and training, using a 5-point scale ranging from very satisfied to very dissatisfied. Only response categories with non-zero values are reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Baseline until end of study (approximately 9.9 months)
Percentage of Clinicians With Confidence Scores for SOC and POC According to the CSDT-Q
The CSDT- Questionnaire assessed confidence in accuracy of the tests (POC and SOC), using a 5-point scale ranging from very confident to very unconfident. Only response categories with non-zero values are reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Baseline until end of study (approximately 9.9 months)
Percentage of Participants With Satisfaction Scores for SOC and POC According to the Patient Satisfaction With Diagnostic Test Questionnaire (PSDT-Q)
The PSDT- Questionnaire assessed satisfaction with the diagnostic test process based on responses to the following: overall visit satisfaction, information provision, ease of completion, time taken to perform, speed of results, method of results delivery, ease of understanding, accuracy, impact on clinical pathway, overall satisfaction, and satisfaction with sample or measurement collection bases on as: comfort, convenience, type of sample or measurement, person collecting sample or measurement, hygiene using a 5-point scale ranging from very satisfied to very dissatisfied. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: On the day of the medical encounter (Day 1)
Percentage of Participants With Confidence Scores for SOC and POC According to the PSDT-Q
The PSDT-Q assessed confidence in accuracy of the tests (POC and SOC), using a 5-point scale ranging from very confident to very unconfident. Only response categories with non-zero values are reported. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Baseline until end of study (approximately 9.9 months)