Examining The Relationship Between Gingival Thickness and Tooth and Gingival Parameters

Overview

This study aims to assess whether there is a valid correlation between the identified multiple clinical and morphometric parameters and the gingival thickness.

This study focused on the relationship between the clinical parameters of crown and gingival morphology and gingival phenotypes. This study investigated the relationship between clinical and morphological parameters and gingival phenotype and included all teeth up to the first molar. It also compares gingival phenotypes across arch locations and tooth groups. Study Design and Participants: This was a cross-sectional, controlled, randomized, and analytical data study. This cross-sectional study was conducted with 50 participants (21 females, 29 males) aged 18-31 (mean age 22.42 ± 2.87 years) who applied to the Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Dentistry's Periodontology Department for periodontal treatment between September 2022 and May 2023. The statistical power of the study based on crown morphology was determined to be 80%, with a type 1 error rate of 0.05, and a sample size of at least 42 people was determined. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and with the approval of the Ondokuz Mayis University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (OMUKAEK-Protocol No:2022/210. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. Fifty participants were divided into two groups based on the GT measurement taken from the point corresponding to the base of the gingival sulcus and categorized as thin (GT:≤ 1 mm) and thick (GT: \> 1 mm). Clinic Measurements Clinical periodontal parameters, including Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Bleeding on Probing Index (BPI), and probing pocket depth in six regions (mesial labial, midfacial, distal labial, mesial palatal, midpalatal and distal palatal) of each tooth with University of North Carolina (UNC) probe. To reduce pain before the direct measurement, xylocaine spray (10% lidocaine) was applied. GT was measured by with a 20-gauge endodontic file in the buccal region of the incisors, canines, premolars, and first molars in both the upper and lower jaws, corresponding to the base of the gingival sulcus. After fixing the plastic stopper, the distance between the stopper and the tip of the endodontic file was measured using a modified digital caliper with 0.01 mm precision. Papilla Length (PL) was determined by measuring the distance between the zenith points of adjacent teeth and the perpendicular line connecting to the apex of the papilla with a periodontal probe. Each tooth position had its mesial PL recorded. The functional method proposed by Olssoni et al. was used to measure the keratinized gingival width (KGW). KGW was measured to the nearest 0.5 mm from the marginal gingiva\'s mid-buccal position to the mucogingival junction. Measurements of Dental Stone Models An alginate impression of the upper and lower jaw was taken in a stock tray and poured in Type 3 hard plaster according to the manufacturer's specifications to obtain the study model. The following assessments were made on the casts using a digital caliper according to the recommendations of Olssoni et al. Crown length (CL) was determined by measuring the distance between the gingival margin or, if discernible, the cemento-enamel junction and the incisal edge of the crown. the crown. Crown width (CW) was determined by dividing the length of the crown into three portions of equal-height; cervical (C), middle (M), and incisal (I). The distance between the approximal tooth surfaces was measured at the border between portions C and M. Following these measurements, the ratio of crown width (CW)/ crown length (CL) was calculated for each tooth. Using a digital angle gauge with a measurement range of 0-999.9º and a precision of 0.3º, the gingival angle (GA) was calculated by connecting the angle between two lines at the most apical part of the gingival margin of each measured tooth and the most coronal parts of the two adjacent papillae. Intra-Examiner Repeatability: All measurements were performed by a single examiner (SY), and intra-examiner reliability was assessed by repeating the GT measurements on 10 randomly selected participants 2 weeks later. Statistical Analysis Statistical analyses were performed using a statistical software package. Spearman's Correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship between parameters that did not follow a normal distribution. Binary Logistic Regression Analysis was used to examine the parameters related to gingival thickness. receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the cut-off values for parameters in predicting gingival thickness. To assess the consistency of repeated measurements by the researcher, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. Statistical significance level was considered p\< 0.05 Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations and median (minimum-maximum). The relationship and interaction of clinical and morphometric parameters were recorded on the basis of individuals, tooth groups, and dental arch location.

Conditions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes