The use of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy (LLLT) in the ophthalmic field stemmed from dermatology which has shown impact on skin blood flow and regeneration. There has been a rise in clinical interest with emerging evidence in the benefits of photobiomodulation in managing chronic inflammatory conditions such as dry eye disease including improvements in ocular discomfort symptoms, tear film stability and tear volume. Despite the observed clinical benefits, limited research has been done to compare photobiomodulation utilising different wavelengths, as most research on dry eye disease has focused on red wavelengths. It has been purported that blue wavelengths may disrupt microbial growth while red wavelengths stimulate energy production and hence increase heat in the affected tissues, although research into these differential impacts at the ocular surface and external eye has been limited. Hence, the aim of this exploratory clinical trial is to compare the impact of using LLLT incorporating red versus blue wavelengths on eyelid haemodynamics and microbiome, as well as conventional ocular surface measures of patients with dry eye disease and blepharitis (inflammation of the eyelids). Participants with dry eye disease, oil gland disruption and blepharitis will receive 3 treatments with these LLLT, each separted by 1 week apart, and followed up to 1 month after the final treatment session. Participants will be randomised to either of 3 groups: Red light only group, Red + Blue light group, or a sham treatment group.
This study will be a randomized, double-masked, exploratory clinical study to assess the potential difference in impact between the two wavelengths used for LLLT. The whole study involves a total of 4 visits (consisting of 3 treatment visits, and 1 follow-up visit). All visits will be conducted at the Aston Dry Eye Clinic in Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
36
Mask with LEDs emitting at wavelengths of 633nm to facial and eyelids region with their eyes closed
Mask with LEDs emitting at wavelengths of 428nm to facial and eyelid regions with their eyes closed
Mask with LEDs emitting at wavelengths of 633nm, but with \<10% fluence power output, to facial and eyelids region with their eyes closed
Mask with LEDs emitting at wavelengths of 428nm, but with \<10% fluence power output, to facial and eyelids region with their eyes closed
University of Auckland
Auckland, New Zealand
RECRUITINGAston Dry Eye Clinic
Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
COMPLETEDChange from Baseline in Bacterial Colony to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Measure of number of bacterial colonisation obtained from eyelid swabs
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Visual Acuity to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Subjective measure of visual acuity using Logarithm of the Minimum Angle Resolution (logMAR) scoring, ranging from -0.30 which signify the ability to be able to resolve the smallest letters, to 1.00 which signify the ability to resolve only the largest letters
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Non-invasive Tear Break Up Time to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Measure of the stability of tears and how fast the tears evaporate in seconds using the Oculus Keratograph 5M instrument. An average of 3 measurements is obtained.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Blink Rate to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Manual subjective count of the number of blinks using the Oculus Keratograph 5M instrument.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Tear Meniscus Height to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Measure of the volume of tears in mm using the Oculus Keratograph 5M instrument. An average of 3 measurements is obtained.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Lipid Layer Pattern Grading to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Subjective grading of the appearance of the lipid layer pattern as a surrogate measure of its thickness using the Oculus Keratograph 5M instrument. This ranges from Grade 1 indicating very thin lipid layer to Grade 6 indicating very thick lipid layer.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperaemia to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Automated objective grading of the bulbar conjunctival redness using the Oculus Keratograph 5M instrument. This ranges from Grade 0 indicating no redness to Grade 4 indicating substantial redness.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Limbal Conjunctival Hyperaemia to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Automated objective grading of the limbal conjunctival redness using the Oculus Keratograph 5M instrument. This ranges from Grade 0 indicating no redness to Grade 4 indicating substantial redness.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Blood Flow to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Measure of blood flow using laser doppler flowmetry instrument.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Saponification Grading to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Measure of saponification on a scale of 0 (no saponification) to 3 (severe saponification)
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Demodex Presence to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Subjective assessment of the amount of Demodex present at the base of the lashes using slit lamp biomicroscopy and white light illumination.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Number of Blocked or Capped Meibomian Glands to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Subjective assessment of the number of blocked or capped Meibomian Glands using slit lamp biomicroscopy and white light illumination.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Lid Margin Telangiectasia Grading to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Subjective grading of the amount of telangiectasia at the lid margins using slit lamp biomicroscopy and white light illumination. This grading ranges from 0 with no telangiectasia to 3 with severe telangiectasia.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Meibum Expressibility to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Subjective grading of meibum expressibility of lower eyelids using slit lamp biomicroscopy and white light illumination. This grading ranges from 0 with all glands being expressible to 3 with no glands being expressible.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Meibum Quality to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Subjective grading of meibum quality of lower eyelids using slit lamp biomicroscopy and white light illumination. This grading ranges from 0 with clear fluid being expressed to 3 with inspissated toothpaste-like expression.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Fluorescein Corneal Staining to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Subjective grading of the amount of corneal staining using fluorescein instillation, cobalt blue light illumination and the Oxford grading scale. This ranges from 0 with no staining to 5 with intense staining.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Bulbar Conjunctival Staining to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Subjective grading of the amount of bulbar conjunctival staining using fluorescein and lissamine green instillation, white light illumination and the Oxford grading scale. This ranges from 0 with no staining to 5 with intense staining.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Lissamine Green Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Subjective grading of the amount of lid wiper epitheliopathy using lissamine green instillation and white light illumination. This grading ranges from 0 with no lid wiper epitheliopathy to 4 with severe lid wiper epitheliopathy.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in Meibography Meiboscore to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Subjective grading of the amount of Meibomian gland loss using infrared imaging and the Pult meiboscore. This grading ranges from 0 with no gland loss to 4 with severe gland loss (Pult and Reide-Pult, 2013).
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in MMP-9 Tear Concentration to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Measure of matrix metalloproteinase-9 concentration in tears collected with a capillary and measured with a rapid immunoassay test.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
Change from Baseline in LTA Tear Concentration to the Final Follow-up 1 Month After Final Treatment Session
Measure of lymphotoxin-A in tears collected with a capillary and measured with a rapid immunoassay test.
Time frame: Baseline up to 1 month after final treatment session
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.