This clinical trial assesses whether narrative medicine methods may improve the sense of well-being among gastrointestinal (GI) (digestive system) cancer patients. Narrative medicine is a clinical approach where providers can use a patient's own narrative (perspective) of their illness to promote healing and resilience. By applying narrative medicine's main tool, close reading, to clinical practice, clinicians learn to listen and attend to patients more deeply. This allows for freer communication and the creation of a healthcare encounter that centers on the psychological and emotional well being of the patient in addition to their medical conditions. Narrative medicine can include close reading, creative or reflective writing, and discussion. These methods may help patients with GI cancer to reflect on their life stories, both inside and outside of their illness experience, and help them gather skills to optimize their well-being.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the feasibility of implementing narrative medicine tools in serial workshops with patients with malignancy. II. To determine if narrative medicine interventions improve markers and expressions of well-being. DESCRIPTIVE OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate changes in markers and expressions of well-being after 3 sessions of narrative medicine intervention. II. To determine, through qualitative methods, if patients find benefit from the intervention regarding their well-being. III. To decide whether to expand these kinds of interventions to a larger study with control group. OUTLINE: Patients participate in narrative medicine sessions over 60 minutes once every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 3 sessions. After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up at 1 and 3 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
8
Participate in narrative medicine sessions
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Number of participants who complete the narrative medicine sessions
To determine the intervention feasibility, the number of participants who complete the narrative medicine sessions will be tracked.
Time frame: Up to 3 months
Change in well-being scores
Will be evaluated using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised Version (ESAS-r). The total score ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating worse outcomes.
Time frame: Up to 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.