Despite improvements in treatment, metastatic prostate cancer remains incurable, especially in the case of pretreated metastatic castration-resistant disease (mCRPC), where treatment options are limited, leading to an unmet need. The paradigm shift in the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has affected the treatment landscape for mCRPC patients. Many have already received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI), making first-line mCRPC treatment challenging. The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) has shown in previous studies that maintenance treatment with an ARPI, such as darolutamide, can improve radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in pretreated mCRPC patients. In the SAKK 08/16 trial, darolutamide maintenance was found to prolong PFS compared to placebo, especially in patients who responded well to prior ARPI treatment. Based on these findings, the hypothesis is that continued AR-pathway blockade with darolutamide, initiated in patients progressing from mHSPC to mCRPC on ARPI treatment, can improve outcomes when added to standard first-line mCRPC therapy and continued as maintenance. The proposed study aims to evaluate the efficacy of darolutamide, combined with physician-choice standard of care (including taxane chemotherapy, olaparib, radium 223, or LuPSMA), followed by maintenance therapy, on rPFS for patients in the first-line setting of mCRPC.
Metastatic prostate cancer remains incurable despite several major improvements in the treatment. In the case of pretreated metastatic castration-resistant disease (mCRPC) the options remain scarce and there is still an unmet need in this patient population. For the majority of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) the combination of androgen deprivation (ADT) and ARPI (or even a triplet treatment with ADT, docetaxel and darolutamide or abiraterone) has become standard of care. However, when patients become metastatic castration resistant (mCRPC) over time a change of systemic treatment is necessary and thus this paradigm switch in treatment of mHSPC has had a major impact on treatment of mCRPC patients. Many patients developing metastatic castration-resistant disease these days have not only received ADT but also an ARPI and, in some cases, also docetaxel. Therefore, the treatment options in the first line setting of mCRPC are restricted and the outcome is poorer compared to the past. Improvement of first line mCRPC is an important unmet clinical need. The SAKK has demonstrated in two earlier studies that maintenance treatment with an ARPI (orteronel in SAKK 08/11 or darolutamide in SAKK 08/16) can improve radiographic progression-free survival in pretreated mCRPC patients after ARPI and/or taxane based. This maintenance concept could be introduced more generally in the first line setting of mCRPC. In the SAKK 08/16 trial, darolutamide maintenance was shown to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) compared to placebo, in patients with mCRPC who had received prior ARPI, and whose disease did not progress during taxane therapy. This benefit was more pronounced in patients with prior response to ARPI. Taken together it is hypothesized that the continued AR-pathway blockade with darolutamide in patients progressing from mHSPC to mCRPC on ARPI treatment can improve outcome when it is added to a standard first line mCRPC therapy and then continued as maintenance. SAKK proposes to add the ARPI darolutamide to standard first line mCRPC treatment consisting of either taxane chemotherapy (docetaxel or cabazitaxel), olaparib, radium 223 or LuPSMA. The choice of standard of care treatment is up to the investigator, respecting the country specific approvals. Darolutamide will be given concomitantly with the chosen first line treatment and will be continued as maintenance afterwards until radiographic progression.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
162
Darolutamide will be supplied in bottles as 300 mg film-coated tablets for oral intake
* Docetaxel * Cabazitaxel * LuPSMA * Radium 223 * Olaparib, in case of BRCA1 or 2 mutated or HRR deficient tumors The standard of care is chosen by the local investigator and respecting the country specific approvals.
Tumorzentrum Aarau TZA
Aarau, Switzerland
RECRUITINGKantonsspital Baden
Baden, Switzerland
RECRUITINGIstituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana (IOSI)
Bellinzona, Switzerland
RECRUITINGInselspital
Bern, Switzerland
RECRUITINGKantonsspital Graubuenden
Chur, Switzerland
RECRUITINGHôpitaux Universitaires Genève HUG
Geneva, Switzerland
RECRUITINGCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois CHUV
Lausanne, Switzerland
RECRUITINGLuzerner Kantonsspital
Lucerne, Switzerland
RECRUITINGKantonsspital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
RECRUITINGKantonsspital Winterthur
Winterthur, Switzerland
RECRUITING...and 3 more locations
Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS)
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of radiographic disease progression or death from any cause, assessed up to 2 years after end of treatment.
Overall survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause. Patients not experiencing an event (death) will be censored at the last date they were known to be alive.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 2 years after end of treatment.
Time to symptomatic/clinical progression
Time to symptomatic/clinical progression is defined as the time from randomization to the time point of symptomatic/clinical progression. Patients not experiencing an event will be censored at the date of the last visit before initiation of a new anti-cancer treatment, if any. Symptomatic/clinical progression is defined by one of the following: * Occurrence of a SRE due to bone metastases, defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, palliative radiation to bone, or surgery to bone * Treating physician decides for intervention due to new disease related complications (e.g., urinary obstruction, hydronephrosis)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of symptomatic/clinical progression, assessed up to 2 years after end of treatment
Time to PSA progression
Time to PSA progression is defined as the time from randomization to the time point of PSA progression. Patients not experiencing an event will be censored at the date of the last available PSA assessment before initiation of a new anti-cancer treatment, if any. PSA progression is defined as:
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of PSA progression, assessed up to 2 years after end of treatment.
Event-free survival (EFS)
Event-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until the event of interest. Patients not experiencing an event will be censored at the date of the last available assessment before initiation of a new anti-cancer treatment, if any
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of the event of interest, assessed up to 2 years after end of treatment.
Objective response rate according to RECIST
Objective response is defined as any complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria (Appendix 1) achieved during treatment. Any patient with CR or PR as best observed response during treatment will be considered as a success; otherwise they will be considered as a failure. Patients without any tumor assessment or with non-evaluable response (NE) during treatment will be considered as failures for this endpoint.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until date of the end of treatment, estimated up to 2 years after registration
PSA response (30%, 50%, 90% and best)
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the end of treatment, estimated up to 2 years after registration.
Duration of PSA response (50%)
Duration of PSA response is defined as the time from appearance of 50% PSA response during treatment to the time point of PSA progression. Definition of PSA progression is provided above. In case the patient does not experience PSA progression, the patient will be censored at the last PSA assessment before starting a new anti-cancer treatment, if any. This endpoint will be calculated for the subgroup of patients achieving 50% PSA response.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of PSA progression, assessed up to 2 years after end of treatment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.