Comparison of the Efficacy of Peloid Therapy and Paraffin Treatment in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Overview

This study compares the effectiveness of peloid therapy and paraffin treatment in carpal tunnel syndrome. Patients who have already received 2 weeks of peloid therapy or 15 sessions of paraffin treatment will be assessed. Pain and symptom severity are assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ). Electrophysiological examinations will also be conducted at the same time points: baseline, 4 weeks post-treatment, and a 12-week follow-up.

Our study will include 60 patients aged 18-65 who visited the outpatient clinics of Beylikdüzü State Hospital between January 1, 2024, and September 1, 2024, and were diagnosed with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome based on electrophysiological examinations. These patients received either peloid or paraffin treatment. Patients with symptoms persisting for a minimum of 3 months will be included in the study. In this study, pain levels will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the type and severity of symptoms will be assessed with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ). At our hospital, the standard paraffin treatment consists of 15 sessions, administered 5 days per week, while the peloid therapy consists of 10 sessions, also administered 5 days per week. The VAS, BCTQ scores, and electrophysiological evaluations of the patients will be assessed at the 4th and 12th weeks post-treatment. Electrophysiological parameters including median nerve distal motor latency (MMNDL), median nerve distal sensory latency (MNSDL), sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), compound muscle action potential (CMAP), and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) will be recorded.

Conditions

Interventions