The goal of this study is to investigate the acceptability, feasibility, safety and efficacy of an optimized rehabilitation program for treated patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) compared to the current rehabilitation program in the United Kingdom. The aim is to provide patients with more hands on physiotherapy and access to rehabilitation devices at home to support parents currently providing rehabilitation on their own.
The main study objective is to investigate whether an optimized rehabilitation program would be accepted and is feasible within the SMA patient community. The optimized program will comprise of goal orientated rehabilitation with more frequent hands on physiotherapy (every 2 weeks) as well as a SMA approved rehabilitation device used at home on a weekly basis, to provide the most appropriate therapy for each individual patient. All study participants will receive the optimized rehabilitation program over 12 months. An external control group will be used to determine the potential efficacy. Research study visits will take place at baseline, month 6 and month 12. At these visits a general physical exam will be undertaken alongside collecting the participant and carer perception, satisfaction and compliancy of the rehabilitation program. Motor function assessments according to age and ambulatory status will be assessed to help evaluate potential therapeutic benefits.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
14
Consisting of: goal-oriented rehabilitation, hands on physiotherapy sessions and home use of SMA approved rehabilitation device.
Oxford Brookes University
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Acceptability of an optimized rehabilitation program. Measured as number of eligible patients who accepted to participate in the study compared to the number of eligible patients who have refused to participate. Endpoint: 70% of acceptability.
Number of eligible patients who accepted to participate in the study compared to the number of eligible patients who have refused to participate.
Time frame: Baseline visit
Feasibility of an optimized rehabilitation program. Measured as the number of patients who complete the study compared to the number of included patients. Endpoint: 60% of feasibility.
Number of patients who complete the study compared to the number of included patients.
Time frame: Month 12 (end of study)
Safety of an optimized rehabilitation program. Measured as the number of serious adverse events (SAE) compared to the year before the baseline.
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).
Time frame: From baseline to month 12 (end of study)
Carer perception and satification measured through the Clinical Global Impression scale - Improvement (CGI I). Comparison of CGI-S score with CGI-I score of the treated group.
Potential effects of the optimized rehabilitation program on patients experience.
Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12 (end of study).
Carer perception and satification measured through the Clinical Global Impression scale - Severity (CGI-S). Comparison of CGI-S score with CGI-I score of the treated group.
Potential effects of the optimized rehabilitation program on patients experience.
Time frame: Baseline visit: CGI-S.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.