Intensive care unit (ICU) acquired weakness is a common complication associated with long-term physical impairments in survivors of a critical illness. The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) is a valid and reliable instrument for physical function and activity in critically ill patients at risk for muscle weakness. However, its ability to measure change over time (responsiveness) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) have not yet been rigorously investigated. This multi-centre, mixed-methods, longitudinal cohort study therefore aims to establish responsiveness and the MCID of the CPAx in the target population from ICU baseline to ICU and hospital discharge. The study uses routine data from standard physiotherapy sessions like mobility, function and activity with no additional burden for critically ill adults. The investigators expect the CPAx to be responsive allowing its use as a primary outcome in future effectiveness trials for the treatment of ICU-acquired weakness using the newly established MCID for sample size calculation. A high quality, rigorously tested measurement tool for physical function and activity in the ICU should benefit researchers, clinicians and patients.
The use of invasive life support in critically ill patients clearly saves lives but carries substantial risks, including intensive care unit (ICU) acquired weakness and long-term disability. The investigators urgently need a valid, reliable, and responsive measurement tool for this population to use in clinical practice and trials. The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) is a promising measurement instrument to measure change in critically ill patients' physical function and activity. After several studies have confirmed its validity and excellent reliability, it is time to confirm responsiveness and to establish the MCID in a large, international sample of the target population. This multi-centre, mixed-methods, longitudinal cohort study will include critically ill, mechanically ventilated (\>72h) adults at risk for muscle weakness and collect their mobility, physical function and activity with the CPAx and other relevant measures at ICU baseline, to ICU and hospital discharge. Responsiveness will be determined by the ability of the CPAx to identify change according to a prespecified anchor (criterion validity) and by testing prospective hypotheses about the expected magnitude of change between the CPAx and other relevant measures (construct validity). The MCID will be established with anchor- and distribution-based methods, whereby a seven-point global rating of change scale obtained from treating ICU physiotherapists will serve as anchor to distinguish improved from unchanged patients.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
120
Monash Health
Clayton, Australia
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGAlfred Health
Melbourne, Australia
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGInselspital
Bern, Switzerland
RECRUITINGChelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) change score
CPAx change score for ICU period (ICU baseline to ICU discharge); CPAx ranges from 0 (worst score) to 50 (best score)
Time frame: Assessed at ICU discharge (within 24 hours before or after ICU discharge)
CPAx change score
CPAx change score for hospital period (ICU to hospital discharge); CPAx ranges from 0 (worst score) to 50 (best score)
Time frame: Assessed at hospital discharge (last value before discharge)
Global rating of change scale
Seven-point global rating of change scale (GRC): (1) very much improved; (2) much improved; (3) little improved; (4) no change; (5) little deterioration; (6) much deterioration; (7) very much deterioration for 'physical function and activity' (rated by treating physiotherapist)
Time frame: ICU and hospital discharge (change for ICU and hospital period)
ICU Mobility Scale
To evaluate mobility level, the score ranges from 0 (worst) to 10 (best)
Time frame: ICU baseline (within 72-144h after ICU admission), ICU and hospital discharge
Medical Research Council Sum Score
To assess muscle strength, the minimal score is 0 (worst), the maximal score 60 (best), ICUAW is defined as \<48 points
Time frame: ICU baseline (within 72-144h after ICU admission), ICU and hospital discharge
Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale
To assess the level of sedation and/or cooperation, score ranges from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (combative)
Time frame: ICU baseline (within 72-144h after ICU admission), ICU and hospital discharge
Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale
To determine assistance in functional tasks, the score ranges from 0 (worst) to 36 (best)
Time frame: ICU baseline (within 72-144h after ICU admission), ICU and hospital discharge
ICU and discharge destinations
Categorical variable (death, external/internal hospital ward, external ICU/hospital, rehabilitation, home, other) to assess the predictive validity of the CPAx score
Time frame: ICU and hospital discharge
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.