Ceftolozane/Tazobactam vs. Piperacillin/Tazobactam for the Treatment of Bacteremia in Hemato-oncological Patients

Overview

Patients with hematological malignancies receive highly myelotoxic chemotherapy regimens that cause periods of severe myelosuppression, which places them at high risk of developing bacteremia. At a global level, a very significant increase in multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative microorganisms, particularly Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and MDR P.aeruginosa, have been described during the last decade. Among the strategies to reduce bacterial resistance, ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) as a "carbapenem-sparing" antibiotic has been proposed. C/T has broad-spectrum activity since it has action against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and MDR P. aeruginosa. Studies carried out in the real world using this antibiotic in patients with hematological malignancies have demonstrated clinical success in reports and case series, considered a therapeutic option in patients with Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa infections, particularly in MDR pathogens. At the National Cancer Institute (in Spanish, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia), Gram-negative bacilli have been identified for more than 20 years as the pathogens most frequently associated with bacteremia. Escherichia coli occupies the first place in 25% (41% ESBL), followed by Klebsiella spp. in 5.6% (11.2% ESBL) and P. aeruginosa in 5.6% (11.2% MDR). The protocol for approaching and treating hematological malignancy patients with severe neutropenia and fever is to initiate an antimicrobial regimen with piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T). In patients who persist with fever after 48 to 72 hours of starting antibiotics, who present with clinical deterioration, or in whom P/T-resistant bacteria are identified, this is escalated to carbapenem. Therefore, it is proposed to compare the clinical and microbiological response in patients with hematological malignancies who present with severe neutropenia and fever and who present clinical data of bacteremia, with empirical treatment with C/T vs. P/T, trying to reduce the use of carbapenems in this group of patients.

At a global level, a very significant increase in multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative microorganisms has been described during the last decade, particularly Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This is directly related to the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, particularly carbapenems. Among the strategies to reduce bacterial resistance, using ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) as a "carbapenem-sparing" antibiotic is proposed. C/T has been administered in hemato-oncological patients with severe neutropenia, colonized by resistant strains in centers with a high prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae-ESBL and P. aeruginosa MDR. The study's purpose is to demonstrate non-inferiority between ceftolozane/tazobactam vs. piperacillin/tazobactam for patients with hematological malignancies who present severe neutropenia and fever, including those patients who have bacteremia due to Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. C/T is a combination antibiotic with a new cephalosporin, structurally similar to ceftazidime, plus tazobactam. The FDA approved This known beta-lactamase inhibitor in 2018 to treat intra-abdominal and complicated urinary infections. In 2019, its indication was expanded to nosocomial pneumonia and those associated with mechanical ventilation. In Mexico, it was approved for marketing in June 2019. C/T has broad-spectrum activity since it has action against ESBL-producing Enterobacteria and MDR P. aeruginosa. Studies carried out in the real world using this antibiotic in patients with hematological malignancies have demonstrated clinical success in reports and case series, considered a therapeutic option in patients with Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa infections, particularly in MDR pathogens. At the National Cancer Institute, Gram-negative bacilli have been identified for more than 20 years as the pathogens most frequently associated with bacteremia, with Escherichia coli occupying first place at 25% (41% ESBL), followed by Klebsiella sp. in 5.6% (11.2% ESBL), and P. aeruginosa in 5.6% (11.2% MDR). The protocol for approaching and treating hemato-oncological patients with severe neutropenia and fever is to initiate an antimicrobial regimen with piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) if they are hemodynamically stable. In patients who persist with fever after 48 to 72 hours of starting antibiotics, who present with clinical deterioration, or in whom P/T-resistant bacteria are identified, this is escalated to a carbapenem (usually meropenem). A randomized, open, non-inferiority clinical trial comparing 1:1 two antibiotics, P/T vs. C/T, for the treatment of severe neutropenia and fever and/or developing Enterobacteriaceae or P. aeruginosa bacteremia in patients with hematologic malignancies Methodological strategies All patients who come to the National Cancer Institute with signs of severe neutropenia (polymorphonuclear cells \<500 cells/mm3) and fever (≥38.3 degrees Celsius in one measure or ≥38 degrees Celsius in at least two measures) will be considered for inclusion. Blood cultures will be taken upon admission (catheter and peripheral in those with the same), or two peripherals with a difference of 15 minutes between each one. Blood cultures will be requested before signing the informed consent since they are part of the initial approach to these patients, regardless of whether they enter the study. They will be taken before the administration of antimicrobials. Medical staff from the infectious disease department will evaluate the inclusion and exclusion criteria and invite the candidate to the study. If the patient accepts, they will be provided informed consent to review it in detail, explaining any doubts. If they agree to participate, the corresponding signatures will be made. Randomization will be done based on a stratified method in two groups: Group 1, patients with leukemia, and Group 2, patients with other hemato-oncological pathologies. They will be randomized into ten blocks and divided into the two groups above. The administration of the P/T or C/T antimicrobial regimen will begin depending on the group to which they have been assigned, following the manufacturer's instructions and according to the administration standards at INCan. The clinical and microbiological response will be evaluated in the first 72-96 hours (taking randomization as day +1), defined as patient survival plus resolution of fever plus sterilization of blood cultures (taken within the first 72-96 hours). If patients have been fever-free for at least 48 hours and have no growth in blood cultures, they will receive at least five days of antibiotic treatment. The administration time will be at least seven days in patients with P. aeruginosa or Enterobacteriaceae growth in blood cultures. Patients whose blood cultures report growth of bacteria different from the previous ones, yeast, or polymicrobial growth will be excluded from the study. Treatment failure will be considered, and the following will be included in the intention-to-treat analysis: * If the growth in the blood culture is Enterobacteriaceae or P. aeruginosa, resistant to the antibiotic assigned. * There is growth of the same bacteria in control blood cultures taken 72-96 hours after starting antibiotics. * If, during treatment, the patient presents signs of hemodynamic instability, respiratory failure, clinical deterioration, or septic shock, changing the antimicrobial regimen will be considered. The following will be considered a relapse and will be included in the intention-to-treat analysis: * When the same microorganism is isolated at the beginning, it grows in blood cultures after having negative blood cultures. * Or in the first 30 days after completing the antibiotic regimen, considering the resolution of the primary infectious focus. During treatment, they will not be able to receive any other Gram-negative antibiotic except prophylaxis against P. jirovecii (400/80 mg/day TMP/SMX or 800/160 mg every 48 h). The number of days of antibiotics will be counted. It will be documented when an antibiotic is modified and the reason for the change (microbiological failure, clinical deterioration, drug-related adverse events, and others). The appearance of diarrhea will be monitored, and Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin for Clostridiodes difficile will be requested. Patients will be evaluated daily until fever resolution and until hospital discharge (if this occurs in the first 14 days), recording fever and adverse events, including diarrhea, leukocytes, and neutrophils. Follow-up will be carried out until day +30 from the patient's inclusion in the study. If the patient is discharged before this date, a telephone call will be made on day +30 to verify the clinical status. The evolution will be classified as alive without infection, alive with clinical or microbiological data of infection, also considering C. difficile infection, dead from infection without neutropenia, dead from infection with neutropenia, dead from terminal illness, or dead from another cause.