This study will address whether intravenous (IV) iron repletion with a more intensive target will provide greater benefits in improving exercise capacity for patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency. One group of participants will receive a high-dose IV iron regimen with a more intensive target, and the other group will receive a low-dose IV iron regimen with a less intensive target.
Iron deficiency is a common and important comorbidity in heart failure. Randomized controlled trials have consistently demonstrated a beneficial effect of IV iron on exercise capacity and quality of life in iron-deficient patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction. However, these randomized controlled trials exhibit striking heterogeneity in targeting levels for maintenance strategies of IV iron repletion. Some studies (FERRIC-HF, FAIR-HF) withheld intravenous iron in cases of ferritin \>800 ng/mL, hemoglobin \>16.0 g/dL, or transferrin saturation (TSAT) \>50%, while other studies (HEART-FID, IRONMAN) focused on targeting levels that are simply above the definition of iron deficiency. Additionally, the PIVOTAL trial showed that high-dose IV iron decreased recurrent heart failure events in patients undergoing hemodialysis compared to a lower-dose regimen. Whether functional outcomes differ between those on lower versus higher iron repletion targets among patients with heart failure remains unknown. This study will help us address this question. This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open-label blind endpoint study to assess the effects of high-dose IV iron repletion compared to a low-dose IV iron repletion on 12-month change in peak oxygen uptake (VO2) for patients with chronic heart failure and concomitant iron deficiency. Patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a high-dose IV iron regimen and a low-dose IV iron regimen. After the initial iron repletion, ferritin concentration and TSAT were measured every three months and the results used to determine the dose of ferric derisomaltose during the follow-up period. In the high dose group, iron dosing will repeat as long as the serum ferritin was not \>700ng/mL, or if TSAT was not \>40%. Patients in the low dose group will receive repeat iron dosing if ferritin \<100 ng/mL, or if ferritin 100-300 ng/mL and TSAT \<20%, in line with criteria for iron deficiency in current guidelines.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
114
After baseline assessment, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a high-dose IV iron regimen and a low-dose IV iron regimen. After the initial iron repletion, ferritin concentration and TSAT were measured every three months and the results used to determine the dose of ferric derisomaltose during follow-up. In the high-dose group, participants will receive repeat iron dosing as long as the serum ferritin was not \>700 ng/mL, or if TSAT was not \>40% during follow-up.
In the low-dose group, participants will receive repeat iron dosing if ferritin \<100 ng/mL or if ferritin 100-300 ng/mL and TSAT \>20% during follow-up.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
RECRUITINGChange in peak VO2 (ml/min/kg)
Peak VO2 measured by a maximal effort Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in VO2 at ventilatory threshold (ml/min)
Measured by CPET
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in heart rate at peak exercise (bpm)
Measured by CPET
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in peak respiratory exchange ratio
Measured by CPET
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in 6-minute walking distance (m)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52
Change in myocardial iron content by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging T2 star
Measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in skeletal muscle iron content by magnetic resonance imaging T2 star
Measured by skeletal muscle magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in the clinical summary score by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
The KCCQ is a validated instrument for self-assessment of quality of life and health status in heart failure patients. The clinical summary score, which is derived from the physical limitations and heart failure symptoms domains of the KCCQ is a valid measure for assessing the patient's health aspects that may be influenced by CV medications. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire indexed value
EQ-5D-5L: European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels The EQ 5D questionnaire consists of a health descriptive system for participants to self-classify and rate their health status on the day of administration. The descriptive system includes 5 items/dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, which are coded from 1 (best state) to 5 (worst state).
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in cognitive function score by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
The MMSE is a cognitive test. The score is ranged from 0-30 (units of a scale). 30 points is the better outcome. The investigators will assess the change in the score.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in concentration of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, pg/mL)
Tested in blood samples
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, %)
Assessed by echocardiography
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Change in left ventricular global longitudinal stress (LVGLS, %)
Assessed by echocardiography
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Mortality and heart failure-related hospitalization rates
Effects on mortality and HF-related hospitalization rates in patients with heart failure.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.