The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the effect of the fixed combination Citicoline 500 mg, Homotaurine 50 mg, Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) disodium salt (Neuprozin Mito®) on pattern electroretinogram (PERG) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma on well controlled intraocular pressure It will also learn about the safety of this fixed combination. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the fixed combination Citicoline 500 mg, Homotaurine 50 mg, Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) disodium salt (Neuprozin Mito®) improve PERG amplitude and/or latency? Does the fixed combination act as neuromodulator in glaucoma patients based on electrophysiology? Does the fixed combination improve quality of life of glaucoma patients? Does the fixed combination have any effect on optical coherence tomography (OCT)? Researchers will compare the fixed combination Citicoline 500 mg, Homotaurine 50 mg, Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) disodium salt (Neuprozin Mito®) to citicoline 800 mg to see if the fixed combination works better than citicoline alone as neuroprotective agent in glaucoma. Participants will: Take the fixed combination or citicoline alone every day for 4 months After 4 months patients will be crossed over to the other treatment for 4 months. Visit the clinic at enrollment and once every 4 months (at month 4 and at month 8) for checkups and tests (visual field, OCT, PERG and quality of life questionnaire)
Our general purpose is to evaluate the potential beneficial effects of supplementation of a fixed combination of Citicoline 500 mg plus Homotaurine 50 mg plus Pyrroloquinoline quinone on retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) function in subjects with glaucoma by pattern electroretinogram. Primary objective To compare the effects of adding the fixed combination of Citicoline 500 mg plus Homotaurine 50 mg plus Pyrroloquinoline quinone (Neuprozin Mito® - NPM) a tablet a day on PERG examination (p50 wave) at four months of therapy, compared to citicoline 800 mg alone (Cebrolux® - CIT), as add-on to standard topical therapy. Secondary objectives To compare the two treatments (Neuprozin Mito® - NPM vs citicoline - CIT - alone) in terms of: * visual acuity over time * visual field changes over time, if any * Quality of Life perception (National Eye Institute-Visual function questionnaire 25 item -NEI VFQ25 questionnaire) over time * optical coherence tomography - OCT- changes over time, if any * Safety (Incidence of adverse events) Study design and planning Multicentric, randomized, 2-sequence, 2-period, 2-treatment, crossover study, with blind outcome assessor. Centers 1. Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II ; UOC Oculistica, Napoli 2. Clinica Oculistica dell'Università degli Studi di Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia. 3. Dipartimento di Scienze Medico-Chirurgiche e Medicina Traslazionale, Università di Roma "Sapienza", Roma Study duration Study duration ; 14 months Enrolment period: 6 months Minimum Follow-up: 8 months Total sample size: 40 patients
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
40
treatment for 4 months and then cross over to the other therapy
Clinica Oculistica Università Federico II
Napoli, Napoli, Italy
Gemma Caterina Maria Rossi
Pavia, PV, Italy
To compare the effects of adding the fixed combination of Citicoline 500 mg+Homotaurine 50 mg+Pyrroloquinoline quinone (Neuprozin Mito® - NPM) on pattern-electroretinogram -PERG- amplitudes
amplitude of PERG waves (microVolt)
Time frame: 4 months
To compare the effects of adding the fixed combination of Citicoline 500 mg+Homotaurine 50 mg+Pyrroloquinoline quinone (Neuprozin Mito® - NPM) on PERG latencies
latency of PERG waves (milliseconds)
Time frame: 4 months
To compare the two treatments in terms of: • visual acuity over time
visual acuity evaluation
Time frame: 4 months
To compare the two treatments in terms of: • visual field changes over time, if any
Pattern Standard Deviation and Mean Deviation (deciBell)
Time frame: 4 months
To compare the two treatments in terms of: • Quality of Life perception national eye institute-visual function questionnaire 25 items (NEI VFQ25) over time
quality of life with questionnaire national eye institute-visual function questionnaire 25 items (NEI-VFQ25) (from 0=worst score/quality of life to 100 better score/quality of life)
Time frame: 4 months
To compare the two treatments in terms of: • optical coherence tomography - OCT changes over time, if any
retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cells complex (GCC)
Time frame: 4 months
To compare the two treatments in terms of: • Safety (Incidence of adverse events)
adverse events onset
Time frame: 8 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.