One of the standard treatments for women with breast cancer is hormone therapy, but this treatment can cause hot flashes. Hormone replacement therapy, or HRT, is most often prescribed for hot flashes for women in menopause but cannot be given to women on hormone therapy for breast cancer. Fezolinetant, an alternative to HRT, treats hot flashes for women in menopause. As hot flashes happen in the same way for women on hormone therapy for breast cancer, fezolinetant could help these women. In this study, women on hormone therapy for breast cancer who have moderate to severe hot flashes will take part. They will either take fezolinetant or a placebo to treat their hot flashes. The placebo looks like fezolinetant but doesn't have any medicine in it. The main aim of this study is to confirm if women who take fezolinetant have fewer hot flashes that are less severe compared to women who take the placebo. Women 18 years or older seeking treatment for hot flashes. They can take part in the study if they have an average of 7 or more moderate to severe hot flashes each day. They are having hormone therapy for breast cancer from stage 0 (cancer cells that have not spread to nearby tissue) up to stage 3+ (the cancer has spread from the breast to the lymph nodes near the breast or the chest wall). The women will be assigned 1 of 2 study treatments (fezolinetant or placebo) by chance alone. Treatment will be double-blinded. That means that the women in the study and the study doctors will not know who takes which of the study treatments (fezolinetant or placebo). Women who take part in the study will take 1 tablet every day for 52 weeks (1 year). Each woman will be given an electronic handheld device with an app to track their hot flashes on a daily basis. Some women may be able to use the app on their own smartphone. They will also use another device to answer questions about how hot flashes affect their daily life. During the study, the women will visit their study clinic about every 4 weeks for a health check. The last clinic visit will be 3 weeks after the women take their last tablet of study treatment (fezolinetant or placebo). After this visit the women will be called twice to check their health. The women will be in the study for about 2 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
984
Site CA15019
Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
Site CA15016
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada
Site CA15002
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Site CA15001
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Site CA15004
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Site CA15003
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the frequency of moderate to severe VMS
Frequency of moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) events will be calculated as the sum of moderate and severe VMS events per day.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Mean change from Baseline to Week 12 in the frequency of moderate to severe VMS
Frequency of moderate and severe VMS events will be calculated as the sum of moderate and severe VMS events per day.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Mean change from Baseline to Week 4 in the severity of moderate to severe VMS
The severity of VMS will be calculated using a weighted average of VMS events.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Mean change from Baseline to Week 12 in the severity of moderate to severe VMS
The severity of VMS will be calculated using a weighted average of VMS events.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Mean change from Baseline to Week 12 in the MENQOL VMS 1 week recall domain score
The Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) is a 29-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that assesses the impact of 4 domains of menopausal symptoms, as experienced over the last week: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each item score ranges from 1 to 8, and each domain is scored separately; each domain mean ranges from 1 to 8. The overall questionnaire score is the mean of the domain means. Higher scores represent more bothersome menopausal symptoms. A reduction (improvement) of 1 is the minimum clinically important difference in MENQoL.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Mean Change from Baseline to Week 12 in the PROMIS SD SF 8b Total (raw) Score
The Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance - Short Form 8b (PROMIS SD SF 8b) assesses self-reported sleep disturbance over the past 7 days and includes perceptions of: restless sleep; satisfaction with sleep; refreshing sleep; difficulties sleeping, getting to sleep or staying asleep; amount of sleep; and sleep quality. Responses to each of the 8 items range from 1 to 5 and the range of possible summed raw scores is 8 to 40. Higher scores on the PROMIS SD SF 8b indicate more of the concept measured (disturbed sleep).
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Mean change from Baseline to Week 24 in the frequency of moderate to severe VMS
Frequency of moderate and severe VMS events will be calculated as the sum of moderate and severe VMS events per day.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Mean Change from Baseline to Week 24 in the severity of moderate to severe VMS
The severity of VMS will be calculated using a weighted average of VMS events.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Number of participants with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
A TEAE is defined as Adverse Event (AE) observed after starting administration of the investigational study intervention and up to 21 days after the last dose of investigational study intervention.
Time frame: Up to Week 55
Number of participants with Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
AEs of special interest in this study will include: Progression of breast cancer including metastasis; Adverse events of uterine bleeding; Adverse events of liver test elevations; Any liver AE leading to discontinuation.
Time frame: Up to Week 55
Number of participants with laboratory value abnormalities and/or adverse events (AEs)
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant laboratory values.
Time frame: Up to Week 55
Number of participants with vital sign abnormalities and/or adverse events (AEs)
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant vital sign values.
Time frame: Up to Week 55
Number of participants with electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities and/or Adverse Events (AEs)
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG values.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Mean change from Baseline in the frequency of moderate to severe VMS to the average frequency of moderate to severe VMS over Weeks 1 to 3
Frequency of moderate and severe VMS events will be calculated as the sum of moderate and severe VMS events per day.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 to 3
Mean Change from Baseline in the frequency of moderate to severe VMS to the average frequency of moderate to severe VMS over Weeks 5 to 11
Frequency of moderate and severe VMS events will be calculated as the sum of moderate and severe VMS events per day.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 5 to 11
Mean change from Baseline in the severity of moderate to severe VMS to the average severity of moderate to severe VMS over weeks 1 to 3
The severity of VMS will be calculated using a weighted average of VMS events.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 to 3
Mean Change from Baseline in the severity of moderate to severe VMS to the average severity of moderate to severe VMS over weeks 5 to 11
The severity of VMS will be calculated using a weighted average of VMS events.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 5 to 11
Percent reduction >/= 50% in the frequency of moderate and severe VMS from baseline
Frequency of moderate and severe VMS events will be calculated as the sum of moderate and severe VMS events per day. Percent reduction of \>/= 50% will be reported.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12
Percent reduction >/= 75% in the frequency of moderate and severe VMS from baseline
Frequency of moderate and severe VMS events will be calculated as the sum of moderate and severe VMS events per day. Percent reduction of \>/= 75% will be reported.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12
Percent reduction at 100% in the frequency of moderate and severe VMS from baseline
Frequency of moderate and severe VMS events will be calculated as the sum of moderate and severe VMS events per day. Percent reduction of 100% will be reported.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Fezolinetant in Plasma: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) for participants taking tamoxifen
CL/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Fezolinetant in Plasma: Apparent Clearance (CL/F) for participants taking aromatase inhibitors
CL/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of Fezolinetant in Plasma: apparent volume of distribution (Vc/F) for participants taking tamoxifen
Vc/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of Fezolinetant in Plasma: apparent volume of distribution (Vc/F) for participants taking aromatase inhibitors
Vc/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of Fezolinetant in Plasma: average concentration (Cavg) for participants taking tamoxifen
Cavg will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of Fezolinetant in Plasma: Cavg for participants taking aromatase inhibitors
Cavg will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of Fezolinetant in Plasma: trough concentration (Ctrough) for participants taking tamoxifen
Ctrough will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of Fezolinetant in Plasma: Ctrough for participants taking aromatase inhibitors
Ctrough will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen in Plasma: CL/F
CL/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen in Plasma: Vc/F
Vc/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen in Plasma: Cavg
Cavg will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen in Plasma: Ctrough
Ctrough will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite 4-OH tamoxifen in Plasma: CL/F
CL/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite 4-OH tamoxifen in Plasma: Vc/F
Vc/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite 4-OH tamoxifen in Plasma: Cavg
Cavg will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite 4-OH tamoxifen in Plasma: Ctrough
Ctrough will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite N-desmethyltamoxifen in Plasma: CL/F
CL/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite N-desmethyltamoxifen in Plasma: Vc/F
Vc/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite N-desmethyltamoxifen in Plasma: Cavg
Cavg will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite N-desmethyltamoxifen in Plasma: Ctrough
Ctrough will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite endoxifen in Plasma: CL/F
CL/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite endoxifen in Plasma: Vc/F
Vc/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite endoxifen in Plasma: Cavg
Cavg will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of tamoxifen Metabolite endoxifen in Plasma: Ctrough
Ctrough will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of aromatase inhibitors in Plasma: CL/F
CL/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of aromatase inhibitors in Plasma: Vc/F
Vc/F will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of aromatase inhibitors in Plasma: Cavg
Cavg will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
PK of aromatase inhibitors in Plasma: Ctrough
Ctrough will be derived using a population PK model.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in the MENQOL Total Score
The MENQOL is a 29-item PRO measure that assesses the impact of 4 domains of menopausal symptoms, as experienced over the last week: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. The total score is the mean of the domain means. Higher scores represent more bothersome menopausal symptoms. A reduction (improvement) of 1 is the minimum clinically important difference for the MENQoL.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24
Mean change from Baseline in the MENQOL VMS 1-week recall domain score
The MENQOL is a 29-item PRO measure that assesses the impact of 4 domains of menopausal symptoms, as experienced over the last week: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each item score ranges from 1 to 8, and each domain is scored separately; each domain mean ranges from 1 to 8. Higher scores represent more bothersome menopausal symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 24
Mean change from Baseline in the MENQOL psychosocial 1-week recall domain score
The MENQOL is a 29-item PRO measure that assesses the impact of 4 domains of menopausal symptoms, as experienced over the last week: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each item score ranges from 1 to 8, and each domain is scored separately; each domain mean ranges from 1 to 8. Higher scores represent more bothersome menopausal symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24
Mean change from Baseline in the MENQOL physical 1-week recall domain score
The MENQOL is a 29-item PRO measure that assesses the impact of 4 domains of menopausal symptoms, as experienced over the last week: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each item score ranges from 1 to 8, and each domain is scored separately; each domain mean ranges from 1 to 8. Higher scores represent more bothersome menopausal symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24
Mean change from Baseline in the MENQOL sexual 1-week recall domain score
The MENQOL is a 29-item PRO measure that assesses the impact of 4 domains of menopausal symptoms, as experienced over the last week: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each item score ranges from 1 to 8, and each domain is scored separately; each domain mean ranges from 1 to 8. Higher scores represent more bothersome menopausal symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24
Mean change from Baseline in the PROMIS SD SF 8b Total (raw) Score
The PROMIS SD SF 8b assesses self reported sleep disturbance over the past 7 days and includes perceptions of: restless sleep; satisfaction with sleep; refreshing sleep; difficulties sleeping, getting to sleep or staying asleep; amount of sleep; and sleep quality. Responses to each of the 8 items range from 1 to 5 and the range of possible summed raw scores is 8 to 40. Higher scores on the PROMIS SD SF 8b indicate more of the concept measured (disturbed sleep).
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 24
Scores on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) VMS
The PGI-C VMS evaluates patient perceived change in hot flashes/night sweats from the initiation of treatment. Ratings range from (1) much better to (7) much worse.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Change from Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) VMS Score
The PGI-S VMS evaluates patient perceived severity of hot flashes/night sweats. Ratings range from (1) no problems to (4) severe problems.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24
Scores on the PGI-C sleep disturbance (SD)
PGI-C SD evaluates patient perceived change in sleep disturbance from the initiation of treatment. Ratings range from (1) much better to (7) much worse.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Change from Baseline in the PGI-S SD Score
The PGI-S SD evaluates patient perceived severity of sleep disturbance. Ratings range from (1) no problems to (4) severe problems.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24
PGI-S SD response
Proportion of patients achieving a response in PGI-S SD. The PGI-S SD evaluates patient perceived severity of sleep disturbance. Ratings range from (1) no problems to (4) severe problems. PGI-S SD response is defined as at least 2 levels of improvement on PGI-S SD from baseline. Non-response is defined as not achieving a response.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Site CA15020
Victoriaville, Quebec, Canada
Site CA15007
Trois-Rivières, Canada
Site CZ42006
České Budějovice, Czechia
Site CZ42003
Hořovice, Czechia
...and 100 more locations