The PROSPECTIVE trial aims to find out if using the results of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for early breast cancer can select people to not have radiotherapy and still have a low chance of the cancer coming back after surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: \* Will cancer come back in the same breast as the original cancer in patients who have surgery for their breast cancer, but who don't have radiotherapy afterwards because the results of an MRI before surgery showed favourable characteristics for not having radiotherapy.
Breast cancer is the most common serious malignancy in women and most patients are suitable for therapy involving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). For most patients, there is a lack of evidence that breast conserving surgery without adjuvant RT is safe and therefore patients bear the costs, inconvenience and morbidity of RT. Prior attempts to identify large subsets of patients for whom RT can be safely omitted based on clinicopathological features of the index cancer have had limited success, and so RT is currently omitted only in some women over 65 or 70 with small low risk cancers. Identification of a much larger subset of patients in whom adjuvant RT could be safely omitted would be hugely significant, not only to the patients, but to the entire health system. The ANZ 1002 PROSPECT study was a two-arm phase II study that used breast MRI findings and pathological features to identify a group of patients with low risk early breast cancer in whom RT may be safely omitted. The findings at the primary strongly support the hypothesis and suggest that the combination of preoperative MRI and pathological features can identify a substantial group of early breast cancer patients in whom adjuvant RT can be safely omitted. A Health Economic analysis of PROSPECT found that the avoided costs of RT and its potential side effects is likely to substantially outweigh the extra cost of MRI scans and associated investigations. Parallel cross-sectional studies assessing Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in patients taking part in PROSPECT who either did or did not receive RT and a control group found a substantially lower FCR in PROSPECT patients who omitted RT as well as improved HRQoL. The majority of screened and eligible patients (427/443 and 193/201, respectively) for PROSPECT were recruited from two Australian sites. Before the PROSPECT approach can be widely adopted, the findings need to be replicated in a multicentre, international study. In addition, patient reported outcomes and health economic assessments need to be performed prospectively and longitudinally. PROSPECTIVE is the follow-up to PROSPECT which will address these issues, and also include translational research aspects to further study the natural history and outcomes of this group of lower risk early breast cancers.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,400
Omission of radiotherapy based on pre-surgical MRI and pathology findings at surgery.
Ineligible for RT omission on study; includes management of MRI-detected lesions.
UCSF Breast Care Center
San Francisco, California, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGBaylor St Luke's Medical Centre
Houston, Texas, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGThe Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLake Macquarie Private Hospital
Gateshead, New South Wales, Australia
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMater Hospital, Sydney
North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
RECRUITINGWestmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGRoyal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMonash Cancer Centre (MMC Moorabbin)
Clayton, Victoria, Australia
RECRUITINGThe Royal Melbourne Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
RECRUITINGIpsilateral Invasive Recurrence Rate (IIRR) in low-risk patients omitting RT at a median of 5 years follow up
To determine the ipsilateral invasive recurrence rate (IIRR) in lower risk patients with unequivocally unifocal breast cancer and on breast MRI and favourable clinico-pathological features.
Time frame: Median of 5 years follow up (when 300th low risk patient in Arm A reaches 5 years follow up)
Ipsilateral Invasive Recurrence Rate (IIRR) in all participants omitting RT at a median of 10 years follow up after surgery.
To determine the ipsilateral invasive recurrence rate (IIRR) in patients allocated to omit radiotherapy (Arm A1).
Time frame: Median of 10 years follow up after surgery.
IIRR in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
To determine the ipsilateral invasive recurrence rate (IIRR) in participants in Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 years and 10 years follow up after surgery.
Ipsilateral DCIS recurrence rate in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
To determine the ipsilateral DCIS rate in the breast in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
The combined ipsilateral DCIS and invasive recurrence rate (IRR) in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
To determine the combined ipsilateral DCIS and invasive recurrence rate (IRR) in the breast in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
Regional recurrence rate in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
To determine the regional recurrence rate in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
Distant recurrence rate in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B..
To determine the distant recurrence rate in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
Contralateral DCIS and invasive breast cancer rate in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B
To determine the contralateral DCIS and invasive breast cancer rate in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
Breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B
BCCS rate defined as the percentage of people who have not died from breast cancer.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
Overall Survival (OS) in participants in Arm A1, Arm A2, Arm A, Arm B, and Arms A+B.
OS rate defined as the percentage of people alive.
Time frame: Median of 5 and 10 years follow up after surgery.
PRO: Fear of Cancer Recurrence
To determine the difference in Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) between Arm A and Arm B measured by the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory Short Form (FCRI-SF). A higher score indicates a greater fear of recurrence.
Time frame: Median 24 months post-surgery
PRO: Levels of FCR and perception of risk of recurrence in Arm A over time.
To determine the difference in levels of FCR and perception of risk of recurrence in Arm A measured by the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory - Short Form and 2 items adapted from Abbott et al. A higher score indicates greater fear of recurrence and greater risk perception.
Time frame: At median of 24 months post-surgery
PRO: Difference in FCR and perception of risk of recurrence between Arm A and Arm B.
To determine the difference over time in FCR and perception of risk of recurrence between Arm A and Arm B over time as measured by the FCRI-SF and 2 items adapted from Abbott et al. A higher score indicates greater fear of recurrence and greater risk perception.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery.
PRO: Perception of risk of recurrence in Arm A and between Arm A and Arm B.
To determine the difference in perceptions of risk of recurrence in the breast and elsewhere in the body measured by 2 items adapted from Abbott et al. A higher score indicates greater risk perception.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow up post-surgery
PRO: Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) (functional and aesthetic outcomes, fatigue, body image, financial toxicity) between Arm A and Arm B.
To determine the difference in breast-specific symptoms, cosmetic status, arm- and shoulder functional status measured by the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale (BCTOS); and fatigue, body image, financial toxicity measured by the EORTC IL353. A higher score indicates greater morbidity, greater fatigue; greater financial toxicity; poorer body image.
Time frame: At a median of 24 months post-surgery.
PRO: Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) (functional and aesthetic outcomes, fatigue, body image, financial toxicity) in Arm A
To determine the HRQoL (functional and aesthetic outcomes, fatigue, body image, financial toxicity), in Arm A measured by the BCTOS (breast-specific symptoms, cosmetic status, arm- and shoulder functional status) EORTC IL353 measure (custom measure for this protocol) (fatigue, body image, financial toxicity). A higher score indicates greater fatigue, poorer body image and greater financial toxicity.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow up post-surgery
PRO: Difference over time in HRQoL (functional and aesthetic outcomes, fatigue, body image, financial toxicity) between Arm A and Arm B.
To determine the difference in breast-specific symptoms, cosmetic status, arm- and shoulder functional status measured by the BCTOS; and fatigue, body image, financial toxicity measured by the EORTC IL353between Arm A and Arm B.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery.
PRO: Quality of Life Years (QALYs) between Arms A and Arm B.
To determine the Quality of Life Years (QALYs) between Arms A and Arm B measured by the EQ-5D-5L. A high score indicates more problems.
Time frame: At a median of 24 months follow up post-surgery.
PRO: Difference in QALYs over time between Arm A and Arm B.
To determine the Quality of Life Years (QALYs) between Arms A and Arm B over time measured by the EQ-5D-5L. A high score indicates more problems.
Time frame: From registration to allocation, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery..
PRO: Difference in Decision Regret between Arm A and Arm B.
To determine the difference in decision regret between Arm A and Arm B measured by Decision Regret Scale. A higher score indicates more regret.
Time frame: At median of 24 months follow up post-surgery.
PRO: Decision Regret in Arm A.
To determine decision regret in Arm A measured by Decision Regret Scale. A higher score indicates more regret.
Time frame: At median 24 months of follow-up post-surgery.
PRO: Overall mental health and depression over time between Arm A and Arm B.
To determine the overall mental health and differences over time in depression between Arm A and Arm B. Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. A higher score indicates and greater symptom burden.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery.
PRO: Overall mental health and differences over time in anxiety in Arm A.
To determine the overall mental health and differences over time in anxiety in Arm A, measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2. A higher score indicates a higher symptom burden.
Time frame: At 24 months median follow-up post-surgery.
PRO: Overall mental health (depression) over time between Arm A and Arm B.
To determine the overall mental health and differences over time in depression between Arm A and Arm B. Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. A higher score indicates and greater symptom burden.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery.
PRO: Overall mental health (anxiety) over time between Arm A and Arm B.
To determine the overall mental health and differences over time in anxiety between Arm A and Arm B. Measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2. A higher score indicates and greater symptom burden.
Time frame: From allocation to 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 60 months median follow-up post-surgery.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.