The goal of this validation study is to provide further evidence of the metrological properties of the 6-minute stepper test in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or interstitial lung disease (ILD). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is the 6-minute stepper test valid when compared to the 6-minute walk test and a maximal cardiopulmonary cycling test? 2. Does the 6-minute stepper test give the same results when conducted through direct (i.e., therapist in person) and remote (i.e., videoconferencing) monitoring? 3. Is the 6-minute stepper test safe when conducted at the home of the individual with direct (i.e., therapist in person) or remote (i.e., videoconferencing) monitoring? Participants will: * Conduct the 6-minute stepper test (several trials on separate days) * Conduct the 6-minute walk test (1 trial on 1 day) * Conduct a maximal cardiopulmonary test on a cycle ergometer (1 trial on 1 day) * Participate in a semi-structured interview to provide their feedback with regards to the 6-minute stepper test
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
89
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille
Lille, Hauts-de-France, France
FormAction Santé
Pérenchies, Hauts-de-France, France
Concurrent validity
Assessed using paired sample t-tests (or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests) to verify whether peak cardiorespiratory (e.g., oxygen consumption, minute ventilation, heart rate, etc.) and symptomology (i.e., dyspnea and leg fatigue) values obtained during the 6-minute stepper test are comparable to the maximal cardiopulmonary test and the 6-minute walk test
Time frame: Study 1 - Two 3-hour laboratory visits (separated by 6 to 18 days)
Strength of association between peak cardiorespiratory and symptomology values
Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) will be calculated between the number of steps taken during the 6-minute stepper test and peak oxygen consumption and heart rate reached during all three tests
Time frame: Study 1 - Two 3-hour laboratory visits (separated by 6 to 18 days)
Agreement
Assessed with Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (mean difference ± 1.96 standard deviation of the difference) between peak cardiorespiratory and symptomology values reached during the 6-minute stepper test and those reached during the maximal cardiopulmonary test and the 6-minute walk test
Time frame: Study 1 - Two 3-hour laboratory visits (separated by 6 to 18 days)
Test-restest reliability
Reliability (trial 2 versus 3 = directly versus remotely monitored) will be assessed using paired sample t-tests (or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests), Bland-Altman plots (with 95% limits of agreement), and intraclass correlations
Time frame: Study 2 - Trial 2 and 3 (separated by 2 to 5 days)
Adverse events
All minor and serious adverse events, for all trials, will be reported
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Level of comfort during test and perception of safety (qualitative)
Assessed with thematic content analysis of semi-structured interviews (voice-recorded and transcribed)
Time frame: Study 2 - Trial 3 (semi-structured interview of 20 to 30 minutes following the completion of the last trial of the 6MST)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.