The main purpose of this study is to assess whether enlicitide is superior to ezetimibe or bempedoic acid or ezetimibe + bempedoic acid in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in participants with hypercholesterolemia, and to evaluate its safety and tolerability. The primary study hypotheses are enlicitide is superior to ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and ezetimibe + bempedoic acid on mean percent change from baseline in LDL-C at week 8.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
301
Oral tablet
Oral tablet
Oral capsule
enlicitide-matching placebo oral tablet
ezetimibe-matching placebo oral tablet
bempedoic acid-matching placebo oral capsule
Clinical Trials Research ( Site 1509)
Lincoln, California, United States
Healthcare Research Network - Chicago ( Site 1507)
Flossmoor, Illinois, United States
L-MARC Research Center ( Site 1501)
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Velocity Clinical Research Rockville ( Site 1503)
Rockville, Maryland, United States
Velocity Clinical Research, Gulfport ( Site 1505)
Gulfport, Mississippi, United States
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Day 56
Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 56 days of treatment to assess mean percentage change in LDL-C. The mean percent change from baseline in LDL-C at Day-56 is reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 56
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Day 56
Blood samples were collected at baseline and on day 56 of treatment to assess mean percent change in ApoB. The mean percent change from baseline in ApoB at Day 56 is reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 56
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Day 56
Blood samples were collected at baseline and on day 56 of treatment to assess mean percent change in non-HDL-C. The mean percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C at 56 days is reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 56
Median Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) Levels (Lp[a])
Blood samples were collected at baseline and on day 56 of treatment to assess median percent change in Lp(a) levels. The median percent change from baseline at Day 56 is reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 56
Percentage of Participants Who at Day 56 Have an LDL-C <70 mg/dL and ≥50% Reduction From Baseline
Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 56 days of treatment to assess the percentage of participants who have an LDL-C \<70 mg/dL and ≥50% reduction from baseline at day 56. The percentage of participants who have LDL-C \<70 mg/dL and ≥50% reduction from baseline is reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 56
Percentage of Participants Who at Day 56 Have an LDL-C <55 mg/dL and ≥50% Reduction From Baseline
Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 56 days of treatment to assess the percentage of participants who have an LDL-C \<55 mg/dL and ≥50% reduction from baseline at day 56. The percentage of participants who have LDL-C \<55 mg/dL and ≥50% reduction from baseline is reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 56
Percentage of Participants With ≥1 Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who experienced an AE is reported.
Time frame: Up to approximately 147 days
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing From Study Intervention Due to AE
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE is reported.
Time frame: Up to approximately 91 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Piedmont Research Partners ( Site 1506)
Fort Mill, South Carolina, United States
Rainier Clinical Research Center ( Site 1502)
Renton, Washington, United States
Instituto de Investigaciones Clínicas Mar del Plata ( Site 1002)
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
CIPREC-CIPREC Sede Arenales ( Site 1000)
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina
Fundacion Estudios Clinicos ( Site 1001)
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina
...and 25 more locations