The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the J-Valve Transfemoral (TF) System in patients with symptomatic, severe (grade 3 or 4), native aortic valve regurgitation (AR) and AR-dominant mixed aortic valve disease, who are judged by a multi-disciplinary heart team to be at high risk for open surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) sub-study will examine if intervention for AR translates to improved ventricular remodeling, the impact of LV remodeling on clinical outcomes and quality of life, as well as volumetric and myocardial differences between genders.
This is a prospective, single arm, multi-center, interventional pivotal study that will enroll up to 194 subjects in up to 35 investigational sites, predominantly in the United States and up to 7 in Canada, Europe, and Japan. Of the 194 subjects, the CMR imaging sub-study will include up to 75 subjects with severe AR already confirmed by TTE. Additionally, up to 40 roll-in subjects may be treated to enable clinical experience and exposure to the device while allowing a reasonable learning curve. The subjects will then be followed 5-years post-procedure of the J-Valve TF System.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
194
Treatment includes using the J-Valve Transfemoral (TF) System, a transcatheter aortic valve replacement system that consists of the J-Valve TF Bioprosthesis and the J-Valve TF Delivery Device and Loading Accessories, during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Edwards 16Fr eSheath+ Introducer Set may be used for the introduction and removal of the J-Valve TF System.
HonorHealth Research & Innovation Institute
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGCedars Sinai
Los Angeles, California, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGStanford University Medical Center
Palo Alto, California, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGBay Area Structural Heart at Sutter Health
San Francisco, California, United States
All-cause mortality at 1 year
Time frame: 1-year post-procedure
The composite rate of early-safety outcomes at 30 days as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3)
Includes: * All-cause death * All stroke * VARC-3 type 2-4 bleeding * Major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication * Acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 3 or 4 * New permanent pacemaker due to procedure-related conduction abnormalities * Surgery or intervention related to the device
Time frame: 30-days post-procedure
Rate of improvement in cardiovascular-specific health status
As measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-OS)
Time frame: Baseline to 1-year follow-up
Improvement in left ventricular end diastolic diameter index (LVEDDi)
To measure LV remodeling
Time frame: Baseline to 1-year follow-up
Improvement in left ventricular end diastolic volume index (LVEDVi)
To measure LV remodeling
Time frame: Baseline to 1-year follow-up
Improvement in effective stroke volume index (ESVi)
To measure LV remodeling
Time frame: Baseline to 1-year follow-up
Improvement in effective cardiac output index (ECOi)
To measure LV remodeling
Time frame: Baseline to 1-year follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGUC Health Northern Colorado (Medical Center of the Rockies)
Loveland, Colorado, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGNCH Rooney Heart Institute
Naples, Florida, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGEmory University Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGPiedmont
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGNorthwestern University Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING...and 21 more locations