Prospective, single center, single arm, open label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with LinearFirm(ULTRAcel Q+) in temporary eyebrow lifting
The goal of this open label study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with HIFU system (LinearFirm(ULTRAcel Q+)) in temporary eyebrow lifting. The target number of subjects for this clinical trial is set to 30 in a single group, without considering the statistical significance of hypothesis testing and dropout rate. Considering a dropout rate of 20%, the plan is to recruit a total of 38 subjects. 1. Evaluation of the effacacy is includes: Evaluation of eyebrow lifting photos by an independent evaluator, Patient Satisfaction (PS) 2. Evaluation of the safety is includes: Adverse events, vital signs, physical examination, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after the application of medical devices for clinical trials
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
38
High Intensity Focues Ultrasound
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
The avegrage change in AEH (Average Eyebrow Height) and MEH(Maximum Eyebrow Height) compared to the Baseline
\- Evaluation of the efficacy : Average change in AEH (Average Eyebrow Height) and MEH (Maximum Eyebrow Height) from the baseline, after the application of a medical device for clinical trials, as evaluated by an independent evaluator's eyebrow lifting photo evaluation at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks. This result will be displayed as a percentage.
Time frame: Base line and 4, 8, 12, 16weeks
The evaluation of the GLS (Glabellar Line Scale) compared to the Baseline
\- Evaluation of the Exploratory 1. The proportion of participants who showed an improvement of 2 points or more in the Glabellar Line Scale (GLS) evaluation of the most frowning state at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks after the application of a medical device for clinical trials, compared to the baseline. 2. The proportion of participants who showed an improvement of 1 points or more in the Glabellar Line Scale (GLS) evaluation of the most frowning state at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks after the application of a medical device for clinical trials, compared to the baseline.
Time frame: Base line and 4, 8, 12, 16weeks
The evaluation of the TEAE (Treatment Emergent Adverse Event) and serious AE/ADE
1. The frequency and percentage of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE), Adverse Device Effects (ADE), and Serious Adverse Events/Adverse Device Effects (Serious AE/ADE) that occurred after the application of the medical device for clinical trials are presented. 2. The frequency and percentage (%) of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE), Adverse Device Effects (ADE), and Serious Adverse Events/Adverse Device Effects (Serious AE/ADE) that occurred after the application of the medical device for clinical trials are presented.
Time frame: after 16weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.