Pivotal trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the P\&F TricValve® Transcatheter Bicaval Valve System.
The study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled pivotal clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TricValve System with optimal medical therapy (OMT) compared to OMT alone in the treatment of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation and unsuitable for approved transcatheter therapies. Subjects will be followed at discharge, 1 month, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months 12 months, and annually up to 5 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
780
• Heterotopic Transcatheter Valve Replacement (TVR) with the TricValve System in conjunction with optimal medical therapy
Optimal medical therapy
Randomized Cohort: Caval Reflux (CR) grade reduction
Reduction in Caval Reflux (CR) assessed by the echocardiography core laboratory. The CR will be assessed using the 3-grade scale: Grade 1 (no reflux, reflux extending for less than 1 cm below the diaphragm), Grade 2 ( reflux extending for less than 3 cm), Grade 3 (reflux of 3 cm or more). Lower grades of CR are better.
Time frame: 6 months
Randomized Cohort: Hierarchical composite endpoint including: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) improvement, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improvement, and 6-minute walk test distance improvement
Comparison of clinical outcomes using a single hierarchical analysis. Treatment effect will be summarized using Win Ratio statistics, where a value greater than 1 indicates improved outcomes in the experimental group compared with the comparator arm.
Time frame: 6 months
Randomized Cohort: Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAE)
Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAE) in experimental arm (TricValve + OMT)
Time frame: 30 days
Randomized Cohort: Hierarchical composite endpoint: all-cause mortality, RVAD implantation or heart transplant, tricuspid valve surgery or percutaneous tricuspid intervention, heart failure hospitalizations, KCCQ improvement, NYHA functional class improv
Comparison of clinical outcomes using a single hierarchical analysis. Treatment effect will be summarized using Win Ratio statistics, where a value greater than 1 indicates improved outcomes in the experimental group compared with the comparator arm.
Time frame: 1 year
Registry Cohort: Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAE)
Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAE) in single arm registry
Time frame: 30 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
UC Davis Health
Sacramento, California, United States
Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla
San Diego, California, United States
UCSF
San Francisco, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente
San Jose, California, United States
Delray Medical Center
Delray Beach, Florida, United States
HCA Florida Largo Hospital
Largo, Florida, United States
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
Endeavor Health
Glenview, Illinois, United States
...and 25 more locations
Randomized Cohort: Percentage of Device- and/or Procedure-related MAEs
Rate of Major Adverse Events
Time frame: 1 year
Randomized Cohort: All-Cause mortality and Cardiovascular Mortality
Number of deaths from any cause as well as cardiovascular events
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Randomized Cohort: Heart Failure Hospitalizations (HFH)
Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations and worsening HF events without hospitilization
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Randomized Cohort: RVAD Implantation or Heart Transplant
Number of patients requiring RVAD Implantation or Heart Transplant
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Randomized Cohort: Atrial Fibrillation
New onset of atrial fibrillation
Time frame: 1 year
Randomized Cohort: Quality of life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) .
Improvement of at least 10 points from baseline. KCCQ overall summary score is a patient-reported measure of health status, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect better Quality of Life (QOL)
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Randomized Cohort: Changes in symptom status New York Heart Association (NYHA class)
Reduction of at least 1 class from baseline. The NYHA functional classification system categorizes heart failure patients into 4 classes based on physical activity limitation and symptom severity: class I (no symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity), class II (mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity), class III (marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity; comfortable only at rest, and class IV (severe limitations; experiences symptoms even while at rest).
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Randomized Cohort: Changes in functional capacity (6-minute walk test, 6MWT).
Improvement of 6-minute walk distance of at least 30 meters from baseline.
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Registry Cohort: Heart Failure Hospitalization
Comparison of the 12-month post-procedure HFH rate with the 12-month pre-procedure rate
Time frame: 1 year
Registry Cohort: Changes in Quality of life (by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall summary score).
Change from baseline to 12 months. KCCQ overall summary score is a patient-reported measure of health status, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect better Quality of Life (QOL)
Time frame: 1 year
Roll-In Cohort: Percentage of Device- and/or Procedure-related MAEs
Rate of Major Adverse Events
Time frame: 1 year
Roll-In Cohort: All-Cause mortality and Cardiovascular Mortality
Number of deaths from any cause as well as cardiovascular events
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Roll-In Cohort: Heart Failure Hospitalizations (HFH)
Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations and worsening HF events without hospitalization
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Roll-In Cohort: RVAD Implantation or Heart Transplant
Number of patients requiring RVAD Implantation or Heart Transplant
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Roll-In Cohort: Atrial Fibrillation
New onset of atrial fibrillation
Time frame: 1 year
Roll-In Cohort: Quality of life as measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ).
Improvement of at least 10 points from baseline. KCCQ overall summary score is a patient-reported measure of health status, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect better Quality of Life
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Roll-In Cohort: New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class
Reduction of at least 1 class from baseline. NYHA functional classification system categorizes heart failure patients into 4 classes based on physical activity limitation and symptom severity: class I (no symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity), class II (mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity), class III (marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity; comfortable only at rest, and class IV (severe limitations; experiences symptoms even while at rest).
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Roll-In Cohort: 6-minute walk test (6MWT).
Improvement of 6-minute walk distance of at least 30 meters from baseline.
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year