This is an open, follow-up study to compare the performance of three critical imaging methods to detect chronic active lesions in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in vivo.
Smoldering inflammation is recognized as a critical contributor to MS progression-related central nervous system (CNS) damage. Activated microglia and macrophages particularly at chronic lesion edge are believed to promote lesion growth. Reversing their harmful activity may prove to be an efficient way to halt progression independent of relapses in MS. These smoldering, or chronic active lesions can be detected in vivo using advanced imaging techniques. 1) Specific algorithms can be used to identify lesion growth, with a hypothesis that the slowly evolving lesions (SEL) are the ones harboring a rim of activated microglial cells, which contribute to damage in the surrounding tissue, and lesion growth. 2) Lesions partially or entirely surrounded by rims of increased tissue intensity on QSM-MRI (quantitative susceptibility mapping) sequences are considered as iron rim lesions, with iron-containing proinflammatory microglia/macrophages at the lesion edge. 3) In addition, 18 kDa translocator protein-positron emission tomography (TSPO-PET) imaging can be used to identify chronic active lesions based on TSPO-expression by activated innate immune cells, and their gathering at the edges of chronic active lesions. The TSPO-PET analysis of chronic active lesions can be semi-automated, and the specific radioligand binding at the chronic active lesion edge can be quantitated, which enhances the sensitivity of this method. Despite existing preliminary data demonstrating increased QSM signal TSPO-positive lesions, it is yet to be demonstrated how these three imaging methods perform in identifying chronic active lesions when compared to each other at larger scale.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
15
Turku PET Centre
Turku, Southwest Finland, Finland
Number of lesions
The number of lesions identified using each respective method
Time frame: 18 months, 36 months
Co-localization of lesions
Potential co-localization of the RIM+ lesions identified using the various methods.
Time frame: 18 months, 36 months
Correlation of PET imaging and clinical variables
Imaging variables from PET imaging correlated with clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.
Time frame: 18 months, 36 months
Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables
Imaging variables from MR imaging correlated with clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.
Time frame: 18 months, 36 months
Correlation of quality of life questionnaires and clinical variables
Correlation of quality of life questionnaires and clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.
Time frame: 18 months, 36 months
Correlation of neuropsychological evaluation and clinical variables
Correlation of neuropsychological evaluation and clinical status of the patient evaluated with Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS). EDSS describes the disability level and ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 means no disability due to MS and 10 means death due MS.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 18 months, 36 months