Optimizing the Management of Sickle Cell Patients on Hydroxyurea: The Value of Therapeutic Pharmacological Monitoring

Overview

Brief Summary: \* A short description of the clinical study, including a brief statement of the clinical study's hypothesis, written in language intended for the lay public. Limit: 5000 characters. Severe forms of sickle cell syndrome are characterized by the occurrence of repeated vaso-occlusive crises (CVO), early complications and a high morbidity and mortality in these patients. Intensified management is then required, with the introduction of hydroxyurea treatment and then, if it proves ineffective, a transfusion program or even a haematopoietic stem cell allograft. These latter treatments present significant risks of adverse effects for the patient (haemochromatosis, erythrocyte alloimmunisation for the transfusion program, risk of GVH, chemotherapy-related toxicity, MVO for the allograft). Hydroxyurea (HU) is the first treatment based on the specific pathophysiology of sickle cell disease. It is the first line of therapeutic intensification for adult patients and children (age ≥ 2 years) with major sickle cell disease. By mainly increasing the percentage of fetal haemoglobin (HbF), HU decreases the frequency of CVO, complications, hospitalizations and prolongs the life expectancy of patients. The initial dose of HU, recommended by the ANSM, is 15 mg/kg/d once daily. However, the optimal dose cannot be predicted at the start of treatment, which is why a dosage adjustment is essential. The usual dose is between 15 and 35 mg/kg per day. Typically, the dose is increased every 3 months until a mild myelosuppression tolerated by the patient is reached, indicating that the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has been reached. When the dose of HU has reached the MTD, the ratio of clinical (reduced frequency of vaso-occlusive attacks) and biological (better % of HbF) benefits to risk (toxicity) is optimal for the patient. The disadvantages of this practice are that: * dose escalation can be long (9-12 months) * clinicians may be reluctant to escalate HU to MTD * patients are treated sub-optimally during the therapeutic adaptation period. Recent work has shown that it is beneficial for the patient to adjust the initial dose using a pharmacological therapeutic approach in addition to monitoring haematological tolerance. Thus, by customizing the dose of HU using an area under the curve (AUC) measurement at the initial intake of HU at a standardized dose (20 mg/kg/day), the MTD would be achieved in a faster time frame of 6-9 months. The primary objective of our trial is to identify the methodology that will most effectively decrease the time to reach the MTD (therapeutic target). The immediate benefit will be a reduction in CVO which is the major clinical problem and leads to a risk of complications in sickle cell disease.

• Information visit (V0 - 7 days to V0 - 6 months) Patients seen in a routine consultation will be informed about the project in an interview with the doctor, and the information leaflet will be given to the patient and/or his/her parents. In case a patient is admitted to a conventional ward, information about the study will be given in a meeting with the doctor. They will have 7 days to think about it. If they agree to participate in the study, a second appointment will be made, with sufficient time for reflection, for the signing of the consent form. The information and consent of minor patients will be the subject of an adapted procedure. In example, a specific notice will be provided for children of a comprehensible age (under 11 years). In addition, an information leaflet will be provided and adapted to the level of understanding of each age category for minor patients (11 to 16 years; adults). • Inclusion visit (V0 - 7 days to V0 - 173 days) Prior to any research-related examination, the free, informed and signed consent of the parent(s) and the minor, if applicable, the legal representative or the patient if of age, is obtained after a reflection period has been respected. The date on which the subject (or the parent(s) and the minor, if applicable, or the legal representative) agreed to participate in the research is noted in the medical file, as is the date of any objection to participation, if applicable. In addition, the consent of the minor subject will be sought if he/she reaches his/her majority during his/her participation in the research. During this visit, the eligibility criteria will be checked and if the patient is eligible, he/she and/or his/her legal representatives will be able to sign the consent. \- Randomisation visit (V0 visit) The following examinations/actions will be performed to confirm the subject's eligibility for further participation in the study: * Collection of medical, surgical and lifestyle history * Physical examination (weight, height, blood pressure, heart rate, medical examination) * Randomisation is then carried out by the investigator (or a delegated person) via the Internet, using the Cleanweb platform, which is accessed by the investigator or the delegated person using their personal access codes. It allows the allocation of the treatment group, i.e.: * Arm A (Control): Dose adjustment based on haematological assessment * Arm B (Experimental): Dosage adjustment based on AUC at D1, then control of the pharmacokinetic target by T2H and monitoring of haematological tolerance. * HU is then taken orally: The drug should be taken under the usual conditions for children: Samples are then taken on EDTA tubes They will allow the calculation of the patient's exposure to the drug (AUC). The patient is given a prescription for a test to be carried out in the city at D15 after the introduction of the HU or after the dosage has been adjusted, in order to assess tolerance (MTD). • Visit V1 (M3) As at the first visit, the usual clinical and biological examinations are performed. The results of the PK assay and tolerance (MTD) being available, a dosage adjustment is proposed according to the patient's randomisation arm and without exceeding the maximum dose of 35 mg/kg: * Arm A: adjustment in 5 mg/kg steps (or 2.5 mg/kg if CrCl\<60ml/min) according to maximal toxic dose (MTD). * Arm B: Adaptation according to V1 HU AUC. A prescription for a CBC to be carried out in the city at D15 after the dosage adjustment is given to the patient in order to assess tolerance. * V2 visits (M6 +/- 1 month) As at the first visit, the usual clinical and biological examinations are performed. The results of the PK assay and tolerance (MTD) being available, a dosage adjustment is proposed according to the patient's randomisation arm and without exceeding the maximum dose of 35 mg/kg: * Arm A: adjustment in 5 mg/kg steps (or 2.5 mg/kg if CrCl\<60ml/min) according to maximal toxic dose (MTD). * Arm B: Adaptation according to V1 HU AUC. A prescription for a CBC to be carried out in the city at D15 after the dosage adjustment is given to the patient in order to assess tolerance. * Visit 3 (M9 +/- 1 month) and visit 4 (M12 +/- 1 month): As at the first visit, the usual clinical and biological examinations are performed. The results of the PK assay and tolerance (MTD) being available, a dosage adjustment is proposed according to the patient's randomisation arm and without exceeding the maximum dose of 35 mg/kg: * Arm A: adjustment in 5 mg/kg steps (or 2.5 mg/kg if CrCl\<60ml/min) according to maximal toxic dose (MTD). * Arm B: Adaptation according to V1 HU AUC. A prescription for a CBC to be carried out in the city at D15 after the dosage adjustment is given to the patient in order to assess tolerance. • Visit V5 (M15) On the day of visit 5, the patient is welcomed in the department. * HU is taken at the usual dosage. * Then the pharmacokinetic samples are taken. Subsequent follow-up: The study does not require specific follow-up. However, patients will continue to be followed by their referring physician in a day hospital or in a consultation every 3 months, according to the usual management modalities.