This study will retrospectively include LST patients who were admitted to 6 medical centers (The Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University; The Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine; First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University; The Second Hospital of Jiaxing; Jinhua People's Hospital; Lanxi People's Hospital) from 2020.05.01 to 2023.04.30 with the purpose of comparing the efficacy and safety of hybrid ESD and ESD in the treatment of colorectal LST. The complete resection rate, operation time, operation cost, intraoperative and postoperative complications of hybrid ESD and ESD LST will be compared. To provide strong evidence for the selection of endoscopic treatment strategies for LST.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
890
Conventional ESD is the most suitable method for total resection, especially for large lesions. This method can complete the resection of early gastrointestinal cancer and precancerous lesions, while maintaining the integrity of digestive tract anatomy and physiological function.The operation difficulty of this technique is high, the equipment requirements are high, the operation time is long, and the complication rate is closely related to the technical level of the operator.
Hybrid ESD is a better choice, but only can remove the lesion in one piece, but also has a lower technical difficulty than conventional ESD
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
complete resection rate
One-time complete excision
Time frame: 2 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.