The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy and safety of T-DXd with rilvegostomig or T-DXd monotherapy compared with gemcitabine plus cisplatin and durvalumab in patients with advanced treatment naïve HER2-expressing BTC.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
620
Standard of care chemotherapy by intravenous infusion
Standard of care chemotherapy by intravenous infusion
Standard of care immunotherapy by intravenous infusion
Safety Run In: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig
Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs, SAEs and AESIs, as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.
Time frame: Until all patients have completed at least 1 full Cycle (each cycle is 21 days)
Randomized Portion: To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care (SoC) in terms of Overall Survival in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) population
Overall survival (OS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) population OS is defined as time from randomization date until the date of death due to any cause. The comparison will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from therapy or receives another anticancer therapy. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of OS.
Time frame: From date of treatment randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months after first subject randomized)
To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care in terms of Overall Survival in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) population
Overall Survival (OS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) population. OS definition as above.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months after first subject randomized)
To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care in terms of Overall Survival in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) population
Overall Survival (OS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) population. OS definition as above.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months after first subject randomized)
To evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care in terms of Overall Survival in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) population
AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Experimental therapy by intravenous infusion
Experimental therapy by intravenous infusion
Research Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
RECRUITINGResearch Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
WITHDRAWNResearch Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGResearch Site
Fullerton, California, United States
RECRUITINGResearch Site
La Jolla, California, United States
RECRUITINGResearch Site
Los Alamitos, California, United States
SUSPENDEDResearch Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
RECRUITINGResearch Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
RECRUITINGResearch Site
San Francisco, California, United States
RECRUITINGResearch Site
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
RECRUITING...and 252 more locations
Overall Survival (OS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) population. OS definition as above.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months after first subject randomized)
To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care in terms of Progression Free Survival in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Progression free survival (PFS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. PFS is defined as time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anticancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of PFS.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care in terms of Progression Free Survival in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Progression free survival (PFS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. PFS is defined as time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anticancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of PFS.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standrad of Care in terms of objective response rate in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Objective response rate (ORR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by the investigator. The analysis will include objective response data for all randomized patients from randomization until progression, or up to the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression. Patients who go off-treatment without a response or progression and then respond while receiving a subsequent therapy will not be included as responders in the ORR calculation. The measure of interest is the risk difference of ORR.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standrad of Care in terms of objective response rate in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Objective response rate (ORR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by the investigator. The analysis will include objective response data for all randomized patients from randomization until progression, or up to the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression. Patients who go off-treatment without a response or progression and then respond while receiving a subsequent therapy will not be included as responders in the ORR calculation. The measure of interest is the risk difference of ORR.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard if Care in terms of duration of response in patients with HER2-expressing BTC in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Duration of response (DoR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. DoR will be defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients who have a response, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anti-cancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the median DoR.
Time frame: From the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 50 months)
To further evaluate efficacy of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard if Care in terms of duration of response in patients with HER2-expressing BTC in the FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Duration of response (DoR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. DoR will be defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients who have a response, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anti-cancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the median DoR.
Time frame: From the date of first documented response until date of documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 50 months)
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of Overall survival in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations.
Overall survival (OS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. OS is defined as time from randomization date until the date of death due to any cause. The comparison will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from therapy or receives another anticancer therapy. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of OS.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months after first subject randomized)
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of PFS in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Progression free survival (PFS) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. PFS is defined as time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anticancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the hazard ratio of PFS.
Time frame: From the date of randomisation until progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 50 months)
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of Duration of response in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Duration of response (DoR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. DoR will be defined as the time from the date of first documented response until date of documented progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomized patients who have a response, regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy, receives another anti-cancer therapy or clinically progresses prior to RECIST v1.1 progression. The measure of interest is the median DoR.
Time frame: From the date of first response until progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated up to 50 months)
To further evaluate the efficacy of T-DXd with rilvegostomig versus T-DXd monotherapy in terms of Objective response rate in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations
Objective response rate (ORR) in FAS (HER2 IHC 3+) and FAS (HER2 IHC 3+/2+) populations. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by the investigator. The analysis will include objective response data for all randomized patients from randomization until progression, or up to the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression. Patients who go off-treatment without a response or progression and then respond while receiving a subsequent therapy will not be included as responders in the ORR calculation. The measure of interest is the risk difference of ORR.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
To assess the safety and tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care
Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs, SAEs and AESIs, as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
To assess the safety and tolerability of T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of Care
Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs, SAEs and AESIs, as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig in comparison to Standard of Care based on a summary of symptomatic AEs
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Symptomatic adverse events: Descriptive summary of the proportion of patients reporting symptomatic AEs while on treatment using items from the EORTC Item Library (on EORTC IL form 322).
Time frame: Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd monotherapy in comparison to SoC based on a summary of symptomatic AEs
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Symptomatic adverse events: Descriptive summary of the proportion of patients reporting symptomatic AEs while on treatment using items from the EORTC Item Library (on EORTC IL form 322)
Time frame: Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig in comparison to T-DXd monotherapy based on a summary of symptomatic AEs
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Symptomatic adverse events: Descriptive summary of the proportion of patients reporting symptomatic AEs while on treatment using items from the EORTC Item Library (on EORTC IL form 322).
Time frame: Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
To assess time to deterioration in physical functioning in patients treated with T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs Standard of Care
Time to deterioration (TTD) in physical function as measured by the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function 8c - TTD is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of deterioration. Deterioration is defined as the change from baseline that reaches a clinically meaningful deterioration threshold. \- The measure of interest is the HR of TTD in physical function. The analysis will include all randomized patients as randomized.
Time frame: Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
To assess time to deterioration in physical functioning in patients treated with T-DXd monotherapy vs Standard of care
Time to deterioration (TTD) in physical function as measured by the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function 8c - TTD is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of deterioration. Deterioration is defined as the change from baseline that reaches a clinically meaningful deterioration threshold. \- The measure of interest is the HR of TTD in physical function. The analysis will include all randomized patients as randomized.
Time frame: Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
To assess time to deterioration in physical functioning in patients treated with T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs T-DXd monotherapy
Time to deterioration (TTD) in physical function as measured by the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function 8c - TTD is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of deterioration. Deterioration is defined as the change from baseline that reaches a clinically meaningful deterioration threshold. \- The measure of interest is the HR of TTD in physical function. The analysis will include all randomized patients as randomized.
Time frame: Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
To assess the pharmacokinetics of T-DXd, total anti- HER2 antibody, DXd and rilvegostomig in serum
Descriptive analysis of serum concentration of T-DXd, total anti-HER2 antibody, DXd and rilvegostomig in all applicable arms.
Time frame: From the time of informed consent until 90 days after the last dose of T-DXd and rilvegostomig
To investigate the immunogenicity of T-DXd and of rilvegostomig
Descriptive summary of presence of ADAs for T-DXd and rilvegostomig in all applicable arms.
Time frame: From the time of informed consent until 30 and 90 days after the last dose of T-DXd and rilvegostomig, respectively
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig in comparison to Standard of Care based on overall side-effect bother
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Overall side-effect bother that will be mesured using PGI-TT
Time frame: Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd monotherapy in comparison to SoC based on overall side-effect bother
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Overall side-effect bother that will be assessed will be mesured using PGI-TT
Time frame: Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)
To assess the safety and tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostomig vs T-DXd monotherapy
Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs, SAEs and AESIs, as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first (estimated to be assessed up to 50 months)
To describe patient-reported tolerability of T-DXd with rilvegostmog in comparison to T-DXd monotherapy based on overall side-effect bother
Patient-reported tolerability will be described using the Overall side-effect bother that will be assessed will be mesured using PGI-TT.
Time frame: Until End of Study (estimated up to 50 months)