On an individual level, the first expected benefit for the child using the "Kid'EM app" would be an improvement in the quality of his or her rehabilitation goals, which would be more Specific, Measurable, Activity-related, Realistic and Time-defined (SMART). A second expected benefit for the child, thanks to the work carried out in rehabilitation sessions on objectives adapted to his or her needs and day-to-day life, encouraging commitment and motivation, would be to improve the effectiveness of the care offered to him or her, thereby enhancing autonomy and physical health. For parents, taking part in goal-setting, by contributing their knowledge of their child and his or her daily life, would increase their involvement in their child's care and improve their satisfaction with the care offered. By setting SMART functional goals and facilitating communication between therapist, child and family, we expect to see a more child- and family-centred approach to care. On a collective level, the "Kid'EM app" proposal would, as recommended by the WHO, improve professional rehabilitation practices and facilitate convergence towards good clinical practices for professionals (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, PRMs, etc.), thereby increasing the efficiency of the child rehabilitation care system. If its value is demonstrated, the Kid'EM app could be adapted for children with other chronic illnesses requiring non-motor rehabilitation follow-up. The digitization of this goal-setting tool means that this low-cost practice could be widely disseminated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
252
In the "Kid'EM app" experimental group arm, only the application used differs. Visits are organized in the same way as in the controle app arm. Visit 0 (Inclusion) + Visit 1 (V1) : Physical visit Children are included in the study by the investigator, formalized by signing a consent form. Parents fill in questionnaires Visit 2 (when 1st objective is set): Telephone interview to assess performance and satisfaction levels after the first goal has been set. Visit 3 (when setting the 2nd goal): Telephone interview to assess performance and satisfaction levels after the second goal has been set. Visit 4 (week 14 - end of study): Physical visit The questionnaires are again completed by the parents, either directly on a tablet or on paper for later input. Visit 4 bis: Telephone interview to assess performance and satisfaction levels after the work on the first two objectives. Visit 5 (focus group, optional post-study visit)
Use of control application without guidance for goal setting Visit 0 (Inclusion) + Visit 1 (V1) : Physical visit Children are included in the study by the investigator, formalized by signing a consent form. Parents fill in questionnaires Visit 2 (when 1st objective is set): Telephone interview to assess performance and satisfaction levels after the first goal has been set. Visit 3 (when setting the 2nd goal): Telephone interview to assess performance and satisfaction levels after the second goal has been set. Visit 4 (week 14 - end of study): Physical visit The questionnaires are again completed by the parents, either directly on a tablet or on paper for later input. Visit 4 bis: Telephone interview to assess performance and satisfaction levels after the work on the first two objectives. Visit 5 (focus group, optional post-study visit)
Ildys Ty Yann
Angers, France
Les Capucins Angers
Angers, France
IEM Galaxie
Argeles, France
SESSAD 93 - Aulnay
Aulnay-sous-Bois, France
SESSAD APF Basse Goulaine
Basse-Goulaine, France
SMR Concarneau
Concarneau, France
Quality of the first two objectives set for each child during the 12-week 'Kid'EM app' or 'app control' period
Quality, adequate or not (binary criterion, measured with the SMART goal evaluation method: SMART GEM), of the first two goals set for each child during the 12-week period of use of the "Kid'EM app" or "control app".
Time frame: Up to 3 weeks
Quality of the first two objectives set for each child during the 12-week 'Kid'EM app' or 'app control' period
Quality, adequate or not (binary criterion, measured with the SMART goal evaluation method: SMART GEM), of the first two goals set for each child during the 12-week period of use of the "Kid'EM app" or "control app".
Time frame: From week 14 to week 16
Evaluate the evolution of the child's satisfaction with rehabilitation care
\- Evaluation of changes in satisfaction with the care offered to the child using an EVA scale completed by the children at V1.
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluate the evolution of the child's satisfaction with rehabilitation care
\- Evaluation of changes in satisfaction with the care offered to the child using an EVA scale completed by the children at V4
Time frame: Week 14
Evaluation of the improvement in the child's family's satisfaction with rehabilitation care
Assessment of changes in satisfaction with the care offered to the child and his/her family using the CSQ8 scale completed by parents at V1.
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluation of the improvement in the child's family's satisfaction with rehabilitation care
Assessment of changes in satisfaction with the care offered to the child and his/her family using the CSQ8 scale completed by parents at V1.
Time frame: Week 14
Evaluation of the improvement in the effectiveness of care offered to children with chronic illnesses impacting physical health
\- Evaluation of the evolution of the PEDI-CAT scale
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluation of the improvement in the effectiveness of care offered to children with chronic illnesses impacting physical health
\- Evaluation of the evolution of the PEDI-CAT scale
Time frame: Week 14
Evaluation of the improvement in the effectiveness of care offered to children with chronic illnesses impacting physical health
\- Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptative Test) completed by parents at V1.
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluation of the improvement in the effectiveness of care offered to children with chronic illnesses impacting physical health
\- Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptative Test) completed by parents at V1.
Time frame: Week 14
Evaluation of the improvement in the effectiveness of care offered to children with chronic illnesses impacting physical health
\- Evaluation of the evolution of performance and satisfaction levels in achieving the first two rehabilitation goals determined by the rehabilitation professional, by parents at V2 (1st goal), using the CORM (Canadian Measure of Occupational Performance) evaluation methodology.
Time frame: Up to 3 weeks
Evaluation of the improvement in the effectiveness of care offered to children with chronic illnesses impacting physical health
\- Evaluation of the evolution of performance and satisfaction levels in achieving the first two rehabilitation goals determined by the rehabilitation professional, by parents at V3 (2d goal), using the CORM (Canadian Measure of Occupational Performance) evaluation methodology.
Time frame: Up to 3 weeks
Evaluation of the improvement in the effectiveness of care offered to children with chronic illnesses impacting physical health
\- Evaluation of the evolution of performance and satisfaction levels in achieving the first two rehabilitation goals determined by the rehabilitation professional, by parents at V4 (both 1st goals), using the CORM (Canadian Measure of Occupational Performance) evaluation methodology.
Time frame: Week 14
Assessing how to improve the quality of care by promoting child- and family-centered care;
\- Evaluation of the evolution of the MPOC (Measure of Processes Of Care) questionnaire completed by parents at V1.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessing how to improve the quality of care by promoting child- and family-centered care;
\- Evaluation of the evolution of the MPOC (Measure of Processes Of Care) questionnaire completed by parents at V4.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessing how to improve the quality of care by promoting child- and family-centered care;
\- Evaluation of the evolution of the MPOC SP (Measure of Processes Of Care Service Providers) questionnaire completed by rehabilitation professionals at V1
Time frame: Baseline
Assessing how to improve the quality of care by promoting child- and family-centered care;
\- Evaluation of the evolution of the MPOC SP (Measure of Processes Of Care Service Providers) questionnaire completed by rehabilitation professionals at V4
Time frame: Week 14
Evaluation of parents' empowerment during child rehabilitation follow-up
\- Assessment of changes in the Psychological Empowerment Scale (PES) completed by parents at V1
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluation of parents' empowerment during child rehabilitation follow-up
\- Assessment of changes in the Psychological Empowerment Scale (PES) completed by parents at V4
Time frame: Week 14
Evaluation of the acceptability, usability and quality of the "Kid'EM app"
\- Usability of the "Kid'EM app" application with the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire by parents at V4 in the "Kid'EM app" group.
Time frame: Week 14
Evaluation of the acceptability, usability and quality of the "Kid'EM app"
\- Quality of the "Kid'EM app" with the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) by parents at V4 in the "Kid'EM app" group.
Time frame: Week 14
Evaluation of quality improvement in goal setting
\- Evaluation of the average SMART GEM score for the first two objectives established for each child during the 12-week period of use of the "Kid'EM app" or "control app".
Time frame: From week 14 to week 16
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Dispositif sensoriel et moteur Clos Chauveau - DIJON
Dijon, France
Sessad APF France Handicap du Finistère
Gouesnou, France
CAMSP APF Grenoble
Grenoble, France
Cabinet de Kinésithérapie - Elodie CREACH
Landerneau, France
...and 26 more locations