This clinical trial aims to evaluate the feasibility of 'SAT-003' as well as its exploratory safety and efficacy in patients with cancer cachexia who have been diagnosed with solid tumors and have discontinued anticancer treatment.
Cancer cachexia, characterized by weight loss, anorexia, and muscle wasting, is a metabolic imbalance resulting from impaired endocrine function. Unlike simple hunger or loss of appetite, cancer cachexia leads to a reduction in weight and skeletal muscle metabolism despite normal food intake, progressively weakening the body's overall function. Many cancer patients experience this condition, which can increase resistance to cancer treatment, worsen overall health, and diminish quality of life, often leading to the discontinuation of therapy. Cancer cachexia is a common complication in cancer patients and is associated with high mortality rates. Despite ongoing research, no effective treatment for cancer cachexia has been identified, and current therapies targeting appetite improvement or nutritional support often fail to effectively address the full spectrum of symptoms. SAT-003 has been developed to alleviate the symptoms of cancer cachexia and facilitate the resumption of cancer treatment. This single-center, single-arm, prospective feasibility clinical trial aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of SAT-003 in patients with cancer cachexia who have been diagnosed with solid tumors and discontinued chemotherapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
Device: SAT-003(Software) Using SAT-003 for 12 weeks
Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital
Ilsan, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Change in Karnofsky Performance Status(KPS)score
The change in the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score was evaluated from Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 6 (Visit 5) and Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment, and also from Week 6 (Visit 5) to Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment. The KPS score is a scale used to assess a patient's recovery process to daily living after treatment. A score of 0 indicates the worst, non-functional state, while 100 represents a normal state.
Time frame: Baseline, 6weeks, 12weeks, 18weeks, 24weeks
Change in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) score
The change in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) score was evaluated from Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 6 (Visit 5) and Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment, and also from Week 6 (Visit 5) to Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of three domains: global health status/quality of life, functional scales, and symptom scales. The global health status is assessed by 2 items, while the functional scales consist of 15 items evaluating physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning. The symptom scales include 2-3 items for fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting, and single items for dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores for global health status and functional scales, and lower scores for symptom scales, indicate a better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 6weeks, 12weeks, 18weeks, 24weeks
Chagne in Korean Modified Barthel Index (KBMI) Score
The change in the Korean Modified Barthel Index (KMBI) score was evaluated from Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 6 (Visit 5) and Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment, and also from Week 6 (Visit 5) to Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment. The K-MBI is an indicator used to assess a patient's performance in activities of daily living (ADL). A score of 100 represents a normal state requiring no assistance with daily activities, and the score decreases as more assistance is needed (refer to Appendix 4. Korean version of Modified Barthel Index Questionnaire).
Time frame: Baseline, 6weeks, 12weeks, 18weeks, 24weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change in Grip Strength(Hand grip, Pinch grip, Lateral prehension, Three jaw chuck) (lbs)
The change in Grip Strength (Hand grip, Pinch grip, Lateral prehension, Three jaw chuck) were evaluated from Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 6 (Visit 5) and Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment, and also from Week 6 (Visit 5) to Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment. \*Handgrip strength was measured using a JAMAR Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer, and pinch strength was measured using a JAMAR Hydraulic Pinch Gauge. Hand grip, Pinch grip, Lateral prehension, and Three jaw chuck are measured using a handgrip dynamometer and pinch gauge. Before performing each item, the assessor explains and demonstrates the task to the subject. The subject attempts each hand three times, with a rest period after each attempt. The results are evaluated as the average value for each hand.
Time frame: Baseline, 6weeks, 12weeks, 18weeks, 24weeks
Rate of Change (%) in Grip Strength(Hand grip, Pinch grip, Lateral prehension, Three jaw chuck) (lbs)
The change rate in Grip Strength (Hand grip, Pinch grip, Lateral prehension, Three jaw chuck) were evaluated from Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 6 (Visit 5) and Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment, and also from Week 6 (Visit 5) to Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment. \*Handgrip strength was measured using a JAMAR Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer, and pinch strength was measured using a JAMAR Hydraulic Pinch Gauge. Hand grip, Pinch grip, Lateral prehension, and Three jaw chuck are measured using a handgrip dynamometer and pinch gauge. Before performing each item, the assessor explains and demonstrates the task to the subject. The subject attempts each hand three times, with a rest period after each attempt. The results are evaluated as the average value for each hand.
Time frame: Baseline, 6weeks, 12weeks, 18weeks, 24weeks
Change in Lean Body Mass(LBM) and Rate of LBM Change (%)
The change and change rate in Lean Body Mass (LBM) were evaluated from Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 6 (Visit 5) and Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment, and also from Week 6 (Visit 5) to Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment. \*LBM is measured according to the institution's standard procedures using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA).
Time frame: Baseline, 6weeks, 12weeks, 18weeks, 24weeks
Survival Rate (%) at 24 weeks
The proportion of surviving subjects who survived up to 24 weeks after enrollment is evaluated. To assess the proportion of subjects surviving to 24 weeks after the date of enrollment.
Time frame: Baseline, 24weeks
Chemotherapy Resumption Rate(%)
The proportion of patients who resumed chemotherapy and the time (days) elapsed until chemotherapy resumption are evaluated at Week 12 (Visit 8) and Week 24 (Visit 9) post-treatment
Time frame: 12 weeks, 24weeks
Chemotherapy Resumption period(days)
The evaluate the duration from application SAT-003 to resumption of chemotherapy.
Time frame: 24weeks
Adherence Assessment During the Treatment Period
Adherence to device use, measured by the number of sessions performed within the specified period, is evaluated weekly from Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment.
Time frame: Baseline, Week12, through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
Change in Number of External Activity Performances
The change in external activity performance, measured weekly using the investigational medical device, is evaluated from Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 12 (Visit 8) post-treatment. The change in external activity is calculated by comparing the initial number of activity performances within a session to the last data point of the session week.
Time frame: Baseline, Week12, through study completion, an average of 24 weeks